How do we stop first worlders from destroying our planet? Would population controls in industrial countries help the situation? Experts seem to agree they must be made and enforced to have any chance of saving our country!
https://youtu.be/SZfT5MgSbDQ
>>8894537
>Developed world
The developed world has either stable or declining populations. It's the developing world (Africa in particular) that's going to be the major driver for global population growth in the coming century. Population controls in the west would do jack shit.
Fuck me I'm left wing and even I hate this faggot. Please stop posting him, he's not good for my blood pressure.
>>8894537
Just throw Obama, Gore, Nye, Leonardo Dicaprio and half of hollywood into a giant pit and cover it up. That will offset the CO2 footprint of a whole lot of people.
>>8896439
That's the point. Theoretically, if we can't stop Africa from overpopulating, wouldn't it make sense to curb the population in the Western world so not only could we decrease our carbon footprint but we could also make room for the Africans to come here to live better lives?
https://youtu.be/UjGPHF5A6Po
This fucking asshat is so fucking wrong about everything he said in this fucking video. Not to be a reddit atheïst dick but his logic and arguing is non-existent. Destroy this man some more /sci/
Bump. I actually like this channel but this video made me dissmiss the whole channel.
>destroy this man
Kill yourself, we're not your personal army
>our Universe is fine tuned hence God
This argument is so retarded, Jesus, I'm not even an atheist. How does this dipshit know that the Universe didn't come to exist and immediately collapse because four fundamentals weren't just right a gorillion gorillion times before hitting necessary ratios? The unlikeliness of the odds is irrelevant in infinity, if something could exist at all, it WOULD necessarily come to exist.
So /sci/...
>>8894412
It's nine you spastics. You learn BIDMAS in primary school?
android is trash for poor people and autists op
Finals motivation thread. Go.
>>8894129
Here's a motivational piece:
You get exactly the grade you deserve
>>8894131
Even when you cheated on everything?
>>8894137
lol
Do great scientists (=physicists) teach their own kids themselves?
Why would ever the child of Einstein go to physics lesson, for example? His dad knows more than the teachers of the entire school combined.
>>8893565
Einstein was a terrible teacher, being good at something doesnt mean you have pedagogic skills.
>>8893565
It takes time to teach and you don't need a Ph.D. with a long and successful history of publishing to do it. It's better for society to have people apt at teaching spend their time doing that while the Einsteins do research. Whatever genius will go down through healthy family interactions and genetics.
>>8893572
>can answer any physics/math question a student can have
>can solve any problem in physics/math
>can write great scientific papers
>can evaluate and peer review papers of others
>isn't extrovert, handsome, doesn't have charismatic voice, and isn't FUN; just the things a student needs ;^)
Diginatives these days
Also, I'm pretty sure that if you asked any doctoral student who they would like to be their teacher ..
Brainlets of /sci/ - when did you realize you were a brainlet?
I realized when I could barely pass linear algebra even though I was putting honest effort in.
>>8893553
>when did you realize you were a brainlet?
grad school
>>8893553
Group theory
>>8893566
this
>be brainlet
>everyone says complex analysis is easy
>get rekt on every test
science in general is very subjective to geopolitcs and economy.
are we walking towards a science-based society?
>venus project pic (kinda related)
>>8893048
>are we walking towards a science-based society?
the EU is
unfortunately USA isn't
>>8893050
What are the measures that EU is taking to facilitate that?
Maybe if sociology and similar were proper sciences.
But today? No.
Anti-semitism aside, was general relativity bullshit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bACz77taipk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH7zOX5PrVw
>>8892957
No.
>>8892971
Not an argument
>>8892973
>Not an argument.
You asked me a question. You said was relativity bullshit. I'm telling you it's not. If you have a specific question ask it. If you want me to watch 40 minutes of some memesters video then fuck off. I don't care if you think GR is bullshit because it isn't. If you think some part of it is, ask a question.
Why do most people just shut off their brains when they see math above the level of arithmetic?
>>8892766
because they had shit teachers that taught them to memorize everything and understand nothing, so math is traumatic to them and they're rather ignore it
Because math is freedom and they do not want to be free.
>>8892768
wow that was reasonable. i was expecting something about normies and being inferior etc.
Is using cannabis bad for your health, yes or no?
In excess, obviously. However, as with alcohol, you need moderation. People just don't want to accept either the responsibility or the fact that you can be responsible with it so you have people coping saying it literally cures cancer and it has no risk of addiction or they say it will somehow make you a retraded degenerate. Ideally, you shouldn't use drugs, but hey, life can get pretty dull sometimes.
>>8892781
except alcohol literally kills you fast if you use it to get drunk every night where as cannabis wont
>>8892783
Smoking every night will get you retarded though.
Would the world be better if everyone were smart? If everyone:
-Understood math up to, say, calculus
-Understood basic physics and astronomical concepts
-Understood how to interpret statistical trends
-Understood basic epistemology and philosophical reasoning
-Understood the trends in history and how catastrophic governmental and social patterns repeat themselves when populations become complacent and ignorant
Would the world actually be better, or would some of these dumb people who are currently useless bums off in Arkansas all of a sudden have the tools to act upon their fucked up ideals and influence the world?
I can see it going both ways
-The world is better because everyone understands what's going on a bit more
-The world is worse because everyone now has more powerful tools to be evil and selfish
>>8892724
>-The world is worse because everyone now has more powerful tools to be evil and selfish
People only do wrong because they lack foresight.
If everyone was smart then nobody would be smart
>>8892765
If everyone's super, no one is.
>It's Sunday night
>all the brainlets in the class messaging me to see my hw the night before it's due.
What should I do to teach them a lesson?
What peeves you /sci/?
>tfw no one in class has my number because I'm an autistic loser
You shudent have showed them in the first place, standarts are set early on. I only give hints and never show anyone a single letter I wrote. "Too risky" or "none of your business" are nice explanations to the people who ask for them. I hint them only because I'm nice, most of them don't deserve shit
>>8892677
>real analysis class last semester
>on group with russian girl
>she asks for my number so we can message each other regarding groupstuff etc
>give her my number
>sends message about groupmeeting
>don't show up because zzz
>fuck up and break my phone's screen
>don't want to see her or anyone else on my group
>spend the rest of the semester reading through baby rudin ch 1-8 at home
Is 1° Celsius "twice as cold" as 2° Celsius?
What about 14° C and 7° C?
Lets say someone is very used to taking showers in 10° to 15° C water. How theoretically possible is it that they will be able to take a 1° to 5° C shower?
I'd specifically like to know about the safety concern. Taking a 5 minutes shower in 12° C water isn't bad at all for reference.
Plus even if water got twice as cold, does that mean that the harm it could do is also doubled?
>>8892445
Celsius scale isn't good for what your thinking. Convert it to kelvin since its an "absolute" scale.
Is 279 kelvin twice as cold as 278 kelvin? Obviously not. Also, what do you think temperature is?
>>8892445
Please read up on the Celcius and Kelvin scales on your own before posting this garbage.
>>8892445
No, because celsius is not a measurement of intensity, it's a measurement of temperature.
Anyone have experience working with these?
Is this a niche field of study which will result in over specialization and (if lucky) a job as a cog-in-the-machine like high energy / particle physics would? Or is there potential for independent research outside of huge conglomerations like CERN or 100 personnel teams at top universities?
>>8892236
>cog-in-the-machine like high energy / particle physics
Your understanding of what HEP is really like is obviously severely lacking.
There are many HEP experiments to work on outside of the LHC. Similarly, these experiments provide the greatest room for achievement and the acquisition of skills which can propel you into a vast number of private industry positions, beyond the realm of physics.
>>8892288
Still, it's quite a bit harder to secure funding and especially work independently compared to optics wouldn't you say?
Sorry for my over-generalization but the main question stands as to whether or not someone who studies BEC is likely to remain studying BEC or get fucked off to "beyond physics" and into finance?
>>8892236
The vortices on the surface of a BEC are one the very few places in quantum physics that you can observe geometry that has to be described with irrational numbers
>pretty fancy
What's the first proof(s) to ever make you go "ey that's pretty clever"?
Apparently most people's first formal proof seen is the irrationality of sqrt(2) or some geometry proof for volume, but those never really tickled the ol' brain cell or felt interesting.
For me, I'd say the first proof I found interesting was Euclid's proof of infinite primes.
(pic unrelated)
>>8891654
irrationality of sqrt(some odd number) better than sqrt(some even number)
>>8891662
>>>/reddit/
>>8891662
>being annoyed by facebook comics about being socially awkward (a.k.a. normal) is now a right-wing extremist view
guess I'm alt right now
Also, Euler turning the zeta function into a product involving primes was the most jaw-dropping proof I've read at the time.