Hey /sci/ I am a First year undergrad planning to major in Physics.Although I donot participate much here, I get inspired daily on /sci/ regarding amount of books you guys have read and knowledge you guys have. My Uni syllabus is literal shit so I really manage that in small time, I have recently scheduled different subjects to learn like Comp Sci, Mathematics, Astronomy, Physics etc. But to manage like 6 subjects every day, I cannot allocate more than an Hour for each.
I really wanted some nice techniques to read faster ( I have below average reading speed, so I take shit load of time to read books, resulting in me not completing them). I want few techniques you guys do so that I read faster and also grasp everything in one go so that I dont have to read that again and again (Which usually happens when I read a book very fast).I realize Science and Math is fucking vast and doing them slowly will take me nowhere. I really want to read fast and memorize/understand in one go.
Please drop in any links if you have, which might give me more tips for this activity.
>>8600416
Reading advanced books isn't really related to reading speed, and is supposed to be much much slower compared to normal books
Here are a few nice explanations
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/279079/how-to-read-a-book-in-mathematics
https://www.quora.com/How-does-one-go-about-reading-a-math-book
>>8600416
Open book to random page, go straight to exercises.
Attempt to solve exercise.
If successful, repeat until no exercises left.
If unsuccessful, research the book to find the answer then go back to previous step.
That's the fastest you can do a math book, at first it's slow going but then you start blazing off the exercises without reading entire chapters.
>>8600416
I think you should focus on doing problems instead of reading.
After attending the class, you should have some idea to approach the problem.
Try them while referring to the texts and explanations from the internet/friends/TAs/profs.
More efficient.
Passing a course means you're able to solve problems. Not about being able to read the text fast enough.
Obviously, it's easier if you don't take too much difficult courses in 1 semester. Pick your battles. Better to excel in a few core courses instead of taking all courses offered by the Physics, Math, and CS department.
is math invented or discovered?
Are memes invented or discovered?
>>8600311
invented obviously, how could memes possibly be discovered anon?
>>8600299
Invented. Math is nothing but a code, a language. A way to express our thoughts
When did you realize that you wanted to go into a STEM field? What inspired you to do so? Keep in mind Im not talking a specific topic per se, but like when a kid decides they want to go into a field, that kind of inspiration.
(ie. I knew since I was a kid that I wanted to go into math because I always really liked numbers)
What is your story, /sci/?
>>8600233
>When did you realize that you wanted to go into a STEM field?
After I didn't realize on time and it was too late
>>8600238
>After I didn't realize on time and it was too late
Second this. I regret STEM.
>>8600233
when i my lawyer friend told me to not go into law because computers were going to put him out of job
Do you guys think large-scale (on the order of kilograms) transmutation of lead (or other metals) into gold will ever be a reality? Physics isn't my field.
>>8600178
Any idea as to how? It doesn't have to be specific but are there any cutting-edge technologies that could be the very start of this? I understand that this won't be soon at all, but maybe we are at least at the point of kind of having a vague idea as to how...
>>8600182
sadly the research was destroyed
How do we solve the brainlet problem?
>>8600130
What problem?
Plenty of work for them.
Sure you not over thinking this?
>>8600134
What will they do for a living in 20 years? With increasing automation, it seems likely that we're going to have an even larger (and much more rapidly growing) underclass of dependents who will vote for higher and higher levels of taxation.
>>8600139
>What will they do for a living in 20 years?
Provide the unskilled and semiskilled labour required to ensure these automatons are doing there job properly.
You think a factory full of robots does it all under the command one super smart guy.
I think you're the brainlet problem desu.
Is Haskell code monkeying or mathematics?
>is a programming language [programming] or mathematics?
Gee OP, I can't fucking figure it out for the life of me.
What about using the earths magnetic field and a spinning stator ?
>>8599883
Programming and proof writing are the same thing you utter pleb.
>In one corner, The Copenhagen interpretation
>In the other, Pilot Wave Theory
Well, /sci/, which one is it and why?
Everyone knows Copenhagen is bullshit; question is what interpretation isn't.
>>8599715
>tfw /pol/ made another godamn meme out of our beloved science
they are taunting us I swear
>>8599762
You're good. Real good. Still, I want to know which one it is.
>>8599751
You tell me.
How in the world did you guys get through your master thesis? It's fucking killing me. For the last 1.5 years I have worked nearly every day, weekends and "vacations" included and I'm not even close to finished.
halp
Implying people on /sci/ has a master
>>8599572
You should think of it as a slightly larger lab report. Don't think of it as your greatest scientific work and achievement.
>>8599585
This
About to assemble the chamber of my fusion reactor.
How does it look?
>>8599562
Post a picture of the real parts also do leak tests with helium
>>8599562
So how are you machining that?
Could you post the actual diagram with dimensions and such? I can't really tell anything based on something made in paint.
Can /sci/ help me with a Statistical Mechanics problem?
sauce in in Italian: http://server2.phys.uniroma1.it/doc/crisanti/Teach/MecStat/Exams/MS_161114_co_t.pdf
I have a classical gas made up of N particles, contained in a cylinder with an height of L and a radius of 3R, with the axis along the z axis of a (x,y,z) frame of reference.
Each particles has an energy of [math]H(p,q) = \frac{p^2}{2m} +V(x,y)[/math], where the potential is [math]V(x,y)=V_{0}\frac{x^2+y^2}{R^2}[/math] for [math]\sqrt{x^2+y^2} < R[/math], [math]V(x,y)=V_{0}[/math] for [math]R < \sqrt{x^2+y^2} < 2R[/math], and [math]V(x,y)=2V_{0}[/math] for [math]2R < \sqrt{x^2+y^2} < 3R[/math].
I have to find:
1. Mean energy for every particle E(T)/N
2. The pressure at a distance R, 1.5 R, and 3R from the axis of the cylinder
So far I've managed to do the first by calculating the Z(N, T) canonical partition function and using the formula U(T) = -d/d[math]\beta[/math] log(Z(N,T))
I'm having trouble with the second part, and the solution provided lacks the algebraic steps that I probably got wrong
I've calculated the partiotion function of a cylinder with a radius of r<3R, so that the volume considered is not fixed, and I've used the P(T) = d/dV(r) log (Z(V(r))) to find the pressure at a given R.
The issue is that, in the solution given, the integral in the denominator in the boxed fraction in picrelated is calculated up to 3R, and not up to the generic r relative to the volume I'm considering.
>>8599561
bump
>>8599561
I would love to help :) Could you please allow me to ask some clarifying questions so I can help you?
>>8599561
Try posting in sqt thread, I'm sure there are some engineers or mathfags that can help out
>>8599401
im going to say yes... provided the width of the wall is about 0.25 inches.
This is very basic math.
Height: 139m
Base: 230m
This gives a volume of 2,451,033m^3
Now The earth has a circumference of 40,075,017m and our 2ft height equals 0.61m.
This means our wall would have a width of 0.1m or 4 inches.
I would say that is a fair dimension for a stone wall.
>>8599401
My house is a sack of shit, and probably has enough drywall to build a wall around the earth.
It'd just have to be really thin, really short.
Falcon 9 • Iridium Next 1-10
Launch time: 1754:34 GMT (12:54:34 p.m. EST; 9:54:34 a.m. PST)
Launch site: SLC-4E, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California
A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch 10 satellites for the Iridium next mobile communications fleet. Delayed from 1st Quarter. Moved up from August. Delayed from July, Sept. 12, Sept. 19, Dec. 16 and Jan. 9. [Jan. 8]
inb4 boom
>>8599006
If it booms we won't see even a moon-flyby this century.
Nein.
6 ez
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
6/6
1
Would it be possible to terraform our Moon? How would its climate interact with ours if it were possible?
pic related
>>8598569
I don't think it has enough gravity to make an atmosphere feasible.
This is just conjecture, I don't have a piece of paper saying I know more than plebs.
>>8598572
>I don't think it has enough gravity to make an atmosphere feasible.
This is true. Basically you'd have to keep introducing atmosphere from somewhere to make up for the gradual loss of atmosphere into space over time.
>>8598569
I don't think that the moon's soil can grow things, even if there were atmosphere and water, correct me if i'm wrong
Why did I not go into biology?
>>8598478
It was a dead field before CRISPR/Cas9
don't feel bad anon
Do cancer free chicken tendies taste better?
>>8598546
im kinda wanting to get into biology, is it really dead or are you just memeing?