redpill me on imaginary numbers, /sci/
>>8819380
They're a field extension of the reals that allows us to describe solutions to the equation x^2 + 1 = 0.
They can be used to model lots of different physical processes.
>>8819380
originated in 16th century Italy
https://youtu.be/_qvp9a1x2UM?t=2m20s
>>8819380
Imagine a number line. Now copy that line and turn it at 90' to the original line, and BOOM there's your complex numbers.
Suppose there's a very long bar in space, which is about to be hit by a space hammer. At the exact same time that the bar receives the hit, a photon cannon releases a photon at the speed of light in a vacuum. The extremity of the bar which receives the hit and the exit of the cannon are placed at the exact same distance from a vertical red line. Which cross the red line first, the bar or the photon? Or both cross it at the same time? Can physics solve this?
Pic related.
>Is the speed of light in a vacuum greater or less than the speed of sound in the bar?
Gee, can physics solve this?
Of course it can. The impulse you give to the bar travels at the speed of sound in this material, meanwhile the photon travels at the "speed of light" The photon crosses the line first... BY FAR
Are races biologically different?
>>8819178
they need different nutritive input, although the way you were raised and gut microbial has certainly a role in this.
>>8819181
>they need different nutritive input
Really? How?
Anyway, pic related is some evidence for the idea that the races are biologically different. The genes that cause "Asian flush" are almost exclusively found in Asian populations. So clearly different races have different genetics, right? Which makes sense, because different races look different, so it must be genetics driving that.
Just wondering what /sci/ thinks about this.
>>8819186
how many races are there, can you name them
so i know what you want
Let's see if /sci/ can into basic geometric proofs
A is the center of the circle
The lines DC and EC are tangential to the circle
The angle EGA is x
Prove that CFE is an isosceles triangle
>inb4 homework
In this day and age, homework always comes with answers for some reason
I just wanna see if you guys can do this
>>8818885
>In this day and age, homework always comes with answers for some reason
no it doesn't, which daycare are you enrolled in?
do your own homework
for what value of x, nigga-san?
>>8819731
Im assuming he means for any value of x,
at least it is true when EC is vertical, since that's trivial to check.
Describe the moment when you gave up on your scientific career
>>8818228
When I realized the aether was real and it all becomes philosophy anyway
When I realised I liked animation more than anything and that I was studying math just because it seems like the right thing to do. I told myself I study math because I'm fascinated but in reality if math wasn't an elite field I wouldn't be studying it.
I had that idea that there was groups of people that were inferior or superior based on their interests. Kinda like how /sci/ thinks.
>>8818228
When I adopted nihlism, accepted humanity as doomed, and sold out to engineering so I can be a rich hermit and not a cuckslave to humanity
Is it possible to be a scientist and religious?
This includes mathematicians, medical doctors, engineers, etc..
Why or why not? Should it matter? Please explain your answer /sci/
>>8817362
Yes in fact historically most (almost all) scientists have been deeply involved with the church if not clergymen, themselves.
No it doesn't matter, this is old news.
>>8817362
Yes.
>>8817362
Yes desu
t. engineer
Hey guys, whats 1+1?
Asking for a friend.
>>8815880
11, in unary
>>8815880
2 jard 4 mi
define '1' and '+'
suppose we discovered a material that has negative mass. What could we do with it?
Infinite energy and faster than light travel
How could a material have negative mass?
i'm curious what would happen if you pushed on an object with negative mass. you pushing on it would exert a force on it directed away from you, which cause it to move towards you, exerting a force on your hands towards it. would just touching it cause it and your hand to collapse into nothingness?
>be professor
>final exam time
>give my 6 years old son a chance to write a physics problem for my students
>pic related
>only 7% got it right
Tell me /sci/ , are you part of the 7%?
Its 1kg
>>8812919
no its 1.5kg
>>8812922
No its 0.5kg
Post your questions that don't deserve their own thread in here.
Previous thread:
>>8804566
Thread mascot is Mumford's drawing of [math] Spec(\mathbb{Z}[x]) [/math].
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_a_ring
It was very satisfying to realize what Grothendieck meant when he described Spec Z[x] as a magic fan holding together the affine lines over all fields.
>>8812654
Woops sorry buddy, didn't see you had answered. So the thing is that a squarefree number is entirely determined by its set of prime factors (given the number, you take its list of prime factors and conversely, given a finite amount of distinct prime numbers, you get a uniquely determined squarefree number by multiplying them and these are inverse operations).
Through this correspondence, the set of squarefree divisors of n with prime factors among the p_i with i <= j corresponds to the set of subsets of {p_1,...,p_j}, which is how I got [math]\sum_{d^2| n, d \text{ squarefree}} \mu(d) = \sum_{S \subset [\![1,j]\!]} \mu(\prod_{i \in S} p_i)[/math]
The equality [math]\sum_{d^2| n, d \text{ squarefree}} \mu(d) = \sum_{S \subset [\![1,j]\!]} (-1)^{|S|}[/math] then follows from the definition of the Mobius function.
After that, it's all formal: we group the subsets by cardinality (which is formally what you meant by grouping the divisors by their number of prime factors): [math]\sum_{d^2| n, d \text{ squarefree}} \mu(d) = \sum_{i = 0}^j \sum_{S \subset [\![1,j]\!], |S| = i} (-1)^i = \sum_{i=0}^j {j \choose i} (-1)^i[/math] and then we get the conclusion
Let me know if it's still not clear
When a plasma arc slices through a piece of glass, is it doing so with JUST heat, or is there some electrical shit going on too?
The march for science is a step of a global movement to defens the vital role science plays in our society.
It will tak place the 22nd of April. Please find information regarding this on marchforscience dot com
Specifically this thread is about crowdsourcing ideas for signs to hold up during the march. Please post your ideas for what to write/draw on the signs! Sci humor like suggestions are well appreciated.
Aaaand go!
>>8821532
Im on mobile so please dont comment on spelling errors, thank you
scientists belong in the lab, not marching in the streets
>>8821536
>implying that scientists shouldn't voice their concerns
170 partner organisations are supporting this initiative, including but not limited to: the american association of physics teachers, MIT press, society for neuroscience and many more..
The difference between you and me?
Over 20 IQ points :3
Yea, I'm 160 with a PHD in mathematics and you're 134 with a ged from high school
>>8821107
>PHDs post on sci
>>8821091
So that puts you at what... eighty?
How would you solve this (diff eqs) -
y'(x) = -3(lambda)y(x) + (3/10)(lambda)x^2 + (lambda) + (2/10)x, for x in [0, 1]
y(0) = 1/3
I'm supposed to use octave, but honestly I have no idea how to deal with y(x) in y'(x). Is there a name for this kind of problem?
Maybe this place will work better
e4
Almost forgot, solving for the case lambda = 1.
>>8820982
shut up and post a lichess game you idiot
Yo /sci/ can you help me identify this tissue sample? Or point me in the right direction?
I've been looking for days.
The 3 layer structure is really throwing me off I think.
I cant tell wth the massive lumens in the top could be.
The middle might be some kind of smooth muscle? The top and bottom some kind of neural tissue?
Sorry for the shitty quality image.
>>8820785
bump
>>8820785
Stomach?
t. not a medfag
Looks like it could be stomach because of the three muscle layers in different directions.
How much did the industrial revolution contribute to global warming?
>>8820472
It's actually the opposite. The industrial revolution happened because the world was getting warmer and it was fucking up people's crop yields. Correlation != causation.
>>8820480
>It's actually the opposite
>the world was getting warmer
???
How did victorian factories cool the world? Also isn't warmer climate good for crops since libertarians say so?
Doesn't matter
China and india need to be dealt with now. Third world genocide is the only solution to save the environment.
Prove me wrong