Have you ever found yourself in the position where you had to teleologically suspend the ethical?
No, because God doesn't talk to me.
:( pls respond, God
Well seeing as how Kierkegaard thought the teleological suspension of the ethical made sense in the case of the Knight of Faith, then the only situation in which one would have to do so is if he were called upon to do it by God.
>>8038410
Won't happen unless you've made the movement of infinite resignation, which you haven't.
>dat German lit
>dat Norse mythology
>dat Greek mythology
>dat Christian mythology
>dat interaction of /lit/ and /phil/
>dat German Idealism
>dat existentialism
>dat natural science
>dat communism
>dat fascism
>dat criticism
>dat classicism
>dat romanticism
>dat modernism
You have 10 seconds to convince me German /lit/ isn't the Meisterlit
>mfw Germans can't even beat an army of retarded commie Russians with no guns, let alone outdo their toothless gambling-addict authors
>>8038379
>Germans were outnumbered nearly 1:5 on the Eastern front, not accounting partisans
>Americans threw half their steel industry into the USSR, although some divisions couldn't afford weaponry for everyone the USSR was overall much more well equipped than the Germans
>The entire Western allied campaign probably amounted to 5% of the German defeat, while the USSR contributed to the remaining 95, yet all credit is due to fucking Americans nowadays for muh cold war
kill yourself faggot
>>8038405
All this mad but you forgot
>being dumb enough to start a two front against a country with a perfect winning streak
What do you think of Asimov's foundation series? Does it hold up?
>>8038365
Couldn't even get through the first book. Conceptually interesting, found the writing boring as fuck
>>8038365
Only read Foundation, (the first published one), and loved it. I'll be sure to read some of the others soon.
Pic unrelated.
>>8038365
Some of the later ones are pretty bad. Still better than most writers from the genre, but Asimov never attempted to transcend the genre, like Lem did and in some cases the Strugatzkijs did as well.
Decided to read the starter kit.
With the 21st chapter or without?
With, obviously. The author put it in for a reason.
Movie > book imo
Obviously with the 21st chapter. Why would you go against what the author intended? The whole work is meaningless without his intention.
>>8038378
Because there's a great number of people that still believe the book is meaningless WITH the final chapter.
But alright. I probably would've read it either way.
What book fan would read sci-fi this thick
What internet aficionado would post thread this thick
>>8038271
What 8x6 would satisfy a girl this thick
What breakfast eater would eat pancakes this thick
Is anyone up for an Infinite Jest reading group starting May?
>>8038265
DFW hung himself with a belt, pleb.
>>8038265
You'll probably get more out of it just reading it on your own at your own pace. Group readings are pretty plebeian and the only real benefit is forced "motivation", something which you should conjure up on your own or otherwise not even be reading at all.
>>8038265
no. read something good like mason and Dixon, the recognitions or life and fate
Recommended me spanish translations (or alternatives) for pic related--Homero, Platón, Aristóteles y demás.
Gracias.
Vous conaissez le Google? Alors.
>>8038112
Venga, chaval, que no se diga.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=lubricante+anal
putain des mexicains
Daily reminder to learn a new language
Tutti i giorni finché ti piace
>>8037930
αμÎ
>>8037930
Da vero non ai un altra orazzione? per favore
>not creating your own language
plebs
About a week ago, I went to a used bookstore. I found a copy of 'The Brothers Karamazov' for $4.50 CAD. I bought it only knowing a few things I had heard about the book in general.
The translation is by Andrew H. MacAndrew. Has anyone read this translation? Any thoughts about it? Will it ruin my first time with The Brothers Karamazov?
Pic related, except in Very Good condition.
Read it and see for yourself
>>8037809
Wow. What a smart and intelligent answer.
The book is nine hundred pages long. I don't want to get to page eight hundred, an find out that I'm reading a horrible translation that completely botched the entire message/idea behind the book.
>>8037819
m8 you re reading a translation, if you want to get 'the entire message/idea behind the book' read it in russian
fucking faggots
ITT: You post reading material for me that is just on webpages and doesnt require a download to read all of it. Also it must be free. I prefer things that autistic people enjoy.
>I prefer things that autistic people enjoy.
Well, well it's your lucky day:
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/li_hegel.htm
http://friesian.com/
>>8038347
The commentaries on Plato's Apology and Euthyphro are very nice here.
What would make up a Great British Novel?
Middlemarch has been largely agreed as the best British novel of all time. It's true that townmanship, class, gossip and the outdoors are all features of a Great British Novel. But what specifically would set this apart from it's American counterpart?
>>8037525
more gay shit
>>8037525
>But what specifically would set this apart from it's American counterpart?
the violence would be either Islamic or soccer related as opposed to blacks on crack or tfw no gf's shooting up a school
self loathing
Books with the theme of solitude?
100 years of solitude
>>8037494
there's literally a book about a hundred years of it
it's got loads of people in it though
all with the same name for some reason
Argue the merits and value of degrees in English and Philosophy. It's Literally useless to pursue these degrees in University when the hard sciences exist. Defend your major(s) /lit/
Your mom couldn't defend her major slit last night when I spooged in it
>>8037486
language is an integral part of human existence. english is the formal study of a currently predominant language as it is and has been expressed and read by people. this kind of study facilitates effective communication. communication is essential to survival.
philosophy is formalized thinking. thinking is also an integral and essential part of human existence and survival. the hard sciences are different types of a philosophy, namely empiricism. even bare facts unearthed by 'hard sciences' require philosophical interpretation. see for example the different competing interpretations of quantumn mechanics. the equations and experiments of quantumn mechanics are singular, but they are INTERPRETED differently. this is philosophy.
>It's Literally useless to pursue these degress
but it's literally all about fulfilling desire though. things like 'merit,' 'value,' or 'use' are pretenses cowards use to justify their personal preferences. the premise of a degree being useful or not is the assumption that human beings must continue to survive in the universe. many billions of years went by without us being here, and literally countless billions more will follow our collective annihilation. while we are here it is paramount we pursue our own desires, goals, and passions. some of us that is reading and thinking about fiction, others that may be looking at and thinking about distant stars. no need to condescend
>>8037486
>hard science
LOL
Why is this one of your favorites, /lit/?
I don't understand the point of it. Why did he shoot that arab multiple times? Blaming it on the sun isn't a valid reason. Was he a psychopath?
>>8037429
it isn't
>>8037926
Try reading Camus' essay The Myth of Sisyphus and then you will understand maybe.
He wasn't a psychopath, he just understood the meaninglessness of everything.
how do I start with [post]-structuralist/pomo philosophy?
is this handsome bald homo a good starting point?
>>8037390
start with the greeks
>>8037390
dont
>>8037390
assuming you know nothing or very little, read an article on the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy or the internet encyclopedia of philosophy, then pick an author that seems interesting to you, read an article about them then go into reading an actual book from them