Holy... holy shit guys. This book fucked my shit up. Anyone else heard of it? More like this?
>>8154811
>Anyone else heard of it?
its on the meme chart ffs
>>8154811
SHUT THE FUCK UP, OP! SHUT! UP!
>tfw you can't talk about a genuinely good book anymore because of meme threads like this
Timshel!
So it goes.
listen to the song timshel by I can make a mess like nobody's business and let me know what you think
>>8154664
Just finished reading this. I really liked it.
Thoughts, /lit/?
Everyone is immortal, it's mortality that is an illusion of consciousness.
>>8154406
That's retarded because Archimedes won't be remembered if language dies. His ideas will have to be rediscovered and the new person will get the credit.
Or does he mean that Aeschylus will be forgotten when the Ancient Greek languages die? Because that's equally retarded.
>>8154406
Mathematical ideas do die tho. Remember when Pythagoreans had a hard on for all numbers being rational? More recently remember the whole Monster Moon Shine thing?
Do you know some good book similart to the Deus Ex series?
>>8154206
Neuromancer maybe?
>>8154206
Th Night's Dawn Trilogy has some interesting themes about human emancipation and our relationship with technology.
Did she do it tho? Did she cheat?
>>8154139
I think you may have missed the point anon.
>>8154139
No. It wouldn't have been so tragic otherwise.
Is being on the internet all day denying the will?
>>8153207
It's an addiction. I wonder if it effects the brain the way alcoholism does
>>8153207
fuck the will, burn it
>>8153211
It does. Internet addiction affects the brain the same way that alcohol does; behavioral and chemical addictions work in the same way.
Who's /lit/'s favorite psychologist?
I've read freud's interpretation of dreams, everything by carl jung except for the red book, most of carl rogers, a lot of aldous huxley, more than I wish i'd read of ken wilber, and albert ellis is on the way in the mail but i'm running low on options and i'm trying to avoid aimless pontification, undefined and interchangeable terminology, and vague generalities that apply loosely to anything but directly to nothing. I realize those things are everywhere in the social sciences but I'd just like to keep it to a minimum. Any new names would be appreciated. Thanks.
>>8153182
Op here. I guess I should clarify that i'm mostly interested in counseling, therapy, educational, and maybe forensic psych.
>>8153182
Freud.
>>8153187
gee thanks
Is anyone else seeing this huge Scientism strain running throughout public discourse? Maybe I'm spending too much time on Reddit, where everyone is either an SJW or suffering from Scientism. And it's not just STEM autists, it's even normies. It seems there's a fucking "Expert" for everything.
Economists, psychologists, historians, journalists, political "scientists", policy "experts"... fucking hell, and I used to laugh at Africans because of witch doctors!
>>8153091
nerd
>>8153091
>Scientism
thread ignored
>>8153097
It's a legitimate term of critique IMO.
At what point did she cross the line from "untalented, but honest and earnest writer" to "complete fucking hack"?
>>8153070
publication of the philosophers stone
When she started retroactively changing parts in her books to fit the times.
the moment I registered for my high school's young republican club.
If I told you I read Tolstoy's entire bibliography how would you react?
I would talk to you only after you've read the entire Dostoevksy.
if you read the english translations? with utter disgust.
Several cases come to mind.
1. I already know you, or know of you:
1.1. I already know that you've read Tolstoy's entire bibliography:
1.1.1. You do not know that I already know: I would or would not inform you of it, depending on the situation.
1.1.2. You know, but have memory problems that I know about: I would or would not remind you of the fact that I already knew this, depending on the situation.
1.1.3. You know, and have no memory problems that I know about: I would ask you why you are bringing up this fact now.
1.2. I do not know that you've read Tolstoy's entire biography:
1.2.1. I know that you can read Russian: I would await your further pronouncements on the subject of Tolstoy.
1.2.2. I do not know whether you can read Russian: I would ask for a confirmation that you can read Russian.
1.2.2.1. Your confirm that you can read Russian: see 1.2.1.
1.2.2.2. You inform me that you cannot read Russian: laugh, spittle, bend, knee-taps.
1.2.2.3. Neither confirmation nor denial comes: as good as a no, see 1.2.2.2.
2. I do not already know you, nor know of you:
2.1. We were engaged in a conversation to which your statement of having read Tolstoy's entire bibliography is relevant: see 1.2.
2.2. We were not engaged in such a conversation:
2.2.1. We were engaged in a different conversation, to which your statement of having read Tolstoy's entire bibliography is not obviously relevant: I would ask you why you are bringing up this fact now.
2.2.2. We were not engaged in any conversation: I would either nod, shrug, or ask what you are hoping to achieve by approaching random strangers with this fact, depending on the situation.
Note: the outcomes to which I have provided alternatives depending on the situation may take into account any such factors as your outwards appearance, poise, behaviour, clothing, sex - apparent or implied, apparent age, smell, voice, medical state, country of origin, etc., in no particular order.
What's up with Buddhism's popularity boom in modern times? How do we know it's a more legitimate religion than Christianity? Has any person achieved "Nirvana" in history besides Buddha? Did Buddha really reach "Nirvana" at all? How do we know he actually reached that state if there is no scientific evidence of such a state? Has science managed to prove with evidence that Buddhist traditions like meditation have an actual impact on human biology? Is Buddhist philosophy (concepts like "Noble Eightfold Path" and "dukkha") legitimate from a true philosophical standpoint, or is it just some fantasy bullshit that some Indian guy spew out of his ass thousands of years ago?
>>8152849
Who cares? Just be yourself.
Kys.
I don't have a PayPay account so could we use PayPal
>>8152849
Christ is all and it is only through him that we shall achieve salvation.
Christ is the drop of water that makes all water known in all its qualities and aspects.
'Nirvana' is but a mirage compared to those who live in Christ.
What if we actually are living in a computer simulation, and superstitions like wishes on birthday candles or shooting stars are based on old cheat codes that have since been patched?
what book is this from
>>8152440
I think so too. Sometimes, thoughts like this pass me by when I'm drifting off to sleep. I become so afraid that the warmth of husband's skin feels so alien and far away. I'm paranoid that whatever good things I have in my life is nothing but an illusion. I'm even more afraid when I think that the simulation is based on my wants and needs. When I don't see opposition to my beliefs or statements, I'm that much closer to believing that my life is completely and utterly fabricated.
>>8152440
Then it makes no difference to how we're currently living.
Also, you're annoying for thinking something so retarded.
Did you get assigned quality literature while you were in high school?
>>8151500
was this cover inspired by John Greene
That is amazing
I love this board
>>8151500
I want a physical copy with this cover.
Why was the boy found dead in the toilet by the squatters?
>>8150432
You mean the one that had its neck broken, most likely after being raped horribly by The Judge?
>>8150432
In the middle of reading this now, really liking it so far. Are there any more westerns /lit/ would recommend if I enjoy this?
>>8151105
Warlock
Last Go Round
Butcher's Crossing
haven't read any of them but I hear them get mentioned a lot.
>Nihilism: nothing has a purpose, so why bother working hard
>Absurdism: even if nothing has a purpose, we must work hard
>Existentialism: we create our own purpose even if it doesn't exist intrinsically
Which one do you agree with and why?
http://www.strawpoll.me/10450708
Is that the pic of someones throat? Or....
>>8148742
your mums clit
>OP: I am a faggot, so I am a faggot