>He hasn't read the saviour of postwar American literature
>>8153426
yes I have
>He hasn't checked the catalog for the other Gass threads.
Would rather read John Hawkes desu
>move to new city and go to the local library to get my card setup
>lady tells how to use the card for the computers and video games
>I ask if it's the same process to check out books
>she laughs and says "no one reads these days"
>i chuckle to be polite
what a fucking cunt desu
>"cunt" as an insult
>>>/pol/
>>8153429
>mind my pronouns shitlord
>>8153429
Cunt. Pussy. Bimbo, slut, whore, you deserved to be raped since your skirt was short. Women shouldn't be allowed to vote. Islam treats women as they ought to be treated: fuckmeat for her husband.
Back to tumblr.
do you read any non-fiction at all?
>>8153376
mostly autobios.
I read a lot of interviews but I doubt if that counts.
>>8153376
Math textbooks.
Other than that only very occasionally. Sometimes I like travel lit, although most of it is probably lightly fictionalized.
>>8153376
Philisophy, psychology, and education. Most recent non fiction was On Becoming a Person by Carl Rogers, brilliant read if you want a profoundly insightful look at life, actualization, relationships, etc.
I'm thinking of reading Existential Psychotherapy by Irvine Yalom next.
So what is the novel writing formula?
I'm asking because according to Jim Butcher, he tried writing books his own way for a while and couldn't sell them. One of his professors told him to follow the formula and he'd be successful. He did, wrote the first book of the Dresden Files, and was quickly picked up and sold.
Probably something about being easy to digest, but with enough pretense freshness, and being long drawn, but with enough climaxes so the public doesn't get bored.
>>8153465
I'm pretty sure it was in reference to shit like character archetypes and pacing (kinda like the hero's journey), but a specific "this is the structure publishing companies are looking for" thing
google "Save the cat!"
then weep tears of blood for the future of humanity.
Do autists make better philosophers?
>>8153277
not really
>>8153277
nick land isn't an autist, according to an ex-student (http://divus.cc/london/en/article/nick-land-ein-experiment-im-inhumanismus) he was:
"thoroughly polite and amiable and, above all, willing to engage in earnest conversation with anyone" and "he preferred to spend his time in the bar with undergraduates, always buying the drinks, smoking continually, and conversing animatedly (and where possible, vehemently) about any topic whatsoever." :)
Sheldon Cooper is not a philosopher
Books by Benito Mussolini?
Was he a good writer?
How accurate was his autobiography?
>>8153152
He was a better writer than Hitler and has a certain style. Very dramatic.
>>8153152
>books by Benito Mussolini
>posts a book by Giovanni Gentile
>>8153152
>not posting the best fascistfu
Any you /lit/fags know this? More books like this?
>>8153087
epic meme my friend
>>8153087
I literally had a dream about this last night because you post it so goddamn much.
I was reading The Book of Disquiet for the first time and it ended up being an endless collection of Twitter and Tumblr posts with vague psychological or philosophical connotations. I woke up pissed at you specifically.
>>8153087
Check out Emil Cioran.
What's some literature that deals with being a depressed pothead hippie bum?
>>8152893
my diary desu
>>8152893
bukowski
>>8152938
I'm not a violent wife beater hack though
Does /lit/ know any good Chinese /lit/?
no such thing chinese lit is trash.
read wuxia.
Plenty of chinese military manuals. Journey to the West, Romance of the Three Kingdoms...
Feng Tang is pretty good, but hard to find.
I am in the market to get a full collection of Donne's poetry and was wondering if anybody could recommend a specific edition and why it would be better.
Right now I am looking at:
https://www.amazon.com/Complete-English-Poems-Everymans-Library/dp/0679405585/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1465689316&sr=8-5&keywords=Donne
and
https://www.amazon.com/Complete-Poetry-Selected-Library-Classics/dp/0375757341/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
Maybe you all have a third recommendation which would be appreciated too. I want all the poetry he wrote but one of them has some of his prose but the other one is hardcover and I don't know anything about his prose work.
>>8152771
Go with the Wordsworth one.
>>8152778
It says collected though so it wouldn't be complete? Is it more portable is that what it has over the others?
Price doesn't matter by the way, they're all relatively cheap.
>>8152787
collected is the same thing as complete
it really doesn't matter which one you get, get whichever looks best and whichever has the introduction by whoever interests you the most. also whichever has the least amount of editing done. footnotes etc are up to you, pick whichever has more or less depending on your wants. i didnt open your links. everyman's generally has decent footnotes and not too many of them. introductions vary but generally decent
hey /lit/, any books similar to pic related? I really liked the religious theme surrounding the story. I'm thinking of "The Exorcist",
PS. No entry level reads, please. I'm done with Lovecraft, Edgar Allan Poe, and the likes.
>>8152766
what about Fuk- Off by Yuri A. kunt?
Lol I'm actually watching that as we speak.
>>8152766
Malleus Maleficarum by Heinrich Kramer which is about how to hunt witches. The witches in the movie are basically what this guy thinks witches are in real life.
The Crucible by Arthur Miller which is about hysteria surrounding witch sightings, which is touched on briefly in the movie (I suppose you could interpret it in a specific way to make it spooky)
Have you read Dream In The Witches' House by Lovecraft? Thats pretty similar shit
Has anyone here ever had anything rejected by a publisher? If so, what did they say?
>>8152628
One guy knew by my writing that I was from /lit/
>>8152908
The highest compliment. I look forward to your publication.
>>8152628
The same 40 or so copy and paste emails about not taking on new clients or the novel not fitting with what they were looking for.
fuck 'em, i'll get there eventually
Name a time another time a corny genre fiction writer wrote down his descent into mental illness and sold it for profit as eloquently as he could.
I don't think you can
>>8152396
*Name another time.
Fuck I should drink some coffee
>>8152396
So he thought he saw some Ayy Lmaos while tripping on acid or something? And got it published?
PKD's entire life.
>Buy an almost complete set of classics (34 books, something like 60 authors ranging from Homer to Dostoevsky) for $100
>Faggot professors add a shitty twenty page commentary that could be found through a simple wikipedia or sparknotes
>Sells one of the classic's that I paid chump change for, for $60
so what nigger
>>8152624
>bumping an hour and a half old thread just to say this
>>8152630
first day on lit, he kiddo?
Symmetry is born from neutrality. At all medians, branches and roots extend. Insides and outsides. Tangible and intangible. Under. Over. Up. Down. This is basic, yes? This writing is typical, no? Questions within vagueness surrounded by analytics and rhetorics. But bury your head underground, and do you see any less? Or do your eyes simply hear less noise? Does your mind cease to imagine what happens to your body? In this case, what has become the roots and what are the branches? That cold blooded brain takes over and are you you anymore? Does the anticipation and uncertainty if what may become if your body drive your being into implosion? Slow down and let your eyes hear the nothing. Let your body see the warmth and the pain and the pleasure of entropy.
There is a part of the brain that can be given conscious control. Or more accurately, can be ignored consciously. This part of the brain--it's name isn't important, right? You have it. I do. Others do, we all do. Those who do this learned it without seeing it. And certainly never heard it--us responsible for your individuality. It creates that barrier in your eyes that tells you you are apart of everything and less a part of it. Abstaining from this function, your head buried deep, you no longer hear anything. Your eyes, your ears, skin, nerves, tongue, polarity, all of them hear nothing. But you still see. You see all that you've heard. You only know what you've heard.
Ahh, but you are neutral! Well, wait. You are neutral right? I mean, after all you aren't one mind are you? And you certainly aren't perfectly symmetrical. For perfect symmetry is one unit of neutrality. But you're a root! Or a branch? Yes, you're that! Not this, but that and certainly not that but this. And in any way, I'm more than certain you're not married. I know this because you aren't one mind! You're a neutral being, and it's a lovely gift to be unwed. To be but eyes between lovers and the despised, buried beneath the dirt with no eyes but sight. You try and see this but your love sees that. And that turns into this as the despised doesn't like being ignored. Soon the world is a whirlwind cooked under a thin crust.
Oh how fun it is to say soon. I've only ever heard it, and can't quite see without it. But even so, I've never really heard it. It was always an echo. And trying to see an echo, is quite something! Do you see it? It's there but it's not! A world dancing corporeal then incorporeal. A blink maybe? Oh who really knows. Your head isnt buried under the dirt. You don't hear anything. Or see. Youre in-between, and no where at all. Yet more buried than the dead man's head will ever be. Hearing a world in a pupil of neutrality.
>>8152263
why do this bad thing to poor doggy :(
>>8152263
Don't do drugs.
And make sure you double check your spelling cuck.
>>8152263
>does acid once
>*~*freEEeeeE YOUuUrrR MiiIIIinD*~*
If what you were saying was innately profound you wouldn't have to try to convince us with "intellectual" rhetoric