>book has 2 writers
>he's an avid reader but doesn't write
>book has no writer
Is there anything more mentally intimate than the melding of minds that happens when two people work on the same book?
Can nonfiction be considered lit?
>>8474532
Yeah, but some are definitely more lit than others.
>>8474539
Those 1 trillion lions are pretty lit
>>8474532
Yeah, its called The Bible.
Is he the most /lit/ composer?
>>8474481
Gyorgy Ligeti is the greatest composer of the last century
>Not Mozart
desu
>>8474481
>not Scriabin
SINCE I CANNOT REMEMBER ONE DAY IN 4CHAN WHERE I SEE MARX FACE AND SOME IDIOT SAYING "WHAT DID HE GOT RIGHT?" OR "IS HE STUPID OR WHAT? HOW CAN PEOPLE DIVIDE EVERYTHING??" "DID HE USE SHOES MADE BY EXPLOITED WORKERS OR WAS HE BAREFEET?", TO BE FAIR NOW WE PICK ON SOMEONE ELSE, WHO WANTS TO JOIN? MAYBE YOU THAT WERE SHITTIG EVERYWHERE? WE'LL SEE
ITS TIME FOR SHIT ON HEGEL
enjoy
the concept of the world you had was to justify your own philosophy wich looked so perfect because you tricked everybody into thinking only in the bounds you wanted.
YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON WHO BELIEVES HIS OWN LIES
>>8474469
>this thread
Mein Gott
(deep sniff)
P U R E
(shirt tug)
I D E O L O G Y
D
E
O
L
O
G
Y
Is there a more portentous, overbaked, ridiculous piece of shit than this that's considered a 'classic'?
>>8474417
a certain blue book, popular around these parts
>>8474417
>portentous
Lol, almost got it
>>8474440
Passive aggression, much like overwrought literature, is typically feminine.
best of his plays and why
nekrassov, just the funniest. and the dialogue in the bedroom of the girl is awesome
whos this shit fuck
>>8475403
I believe that's sartre.
What music do you listen to while you read?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg1eXjBScp4
I usually don't, but when I do it's usually William Basinski or The Caretaker.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL998ajnjN4&app=desktop
>>8474397
tintinnabulations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-Bsy-nJnXo
>Listening to music while you """"read""""
ITT: The best titles of all time
Starting with an obvious one
>>8474374
Read that dudes other book In The Miso Soup earlier this year. It was garbage.
>>8474374
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
>you will never be a young genius writer who changes the world with his prose
>movies won't immediately be made based on your works
>your words alone won't get the world back into reading
>you will never matter
Why even live /lit/?
>>8474337
We are the universe experiencing itself.
Might as well do it.
>>8474337
Except I am all those things.
pic related its me
>>8474358
What does Cara's pussy taste like?
Why has this board become such shit? I feel like the overall quality of threads and posts has declined steeply. Some of the stupid things I see on here seem like they should be on /v/, not /lit/.
What can be done to combat this?
>>8474334
Wait for summer to end.
>>8474334
Seems basically the same as when I started coming about 5 years back. It's worse now because the alt right has infested but /lit/ was never very good.
When moot broke /pol/ as his parting gift all the idiots swarmed onto other boards and now they're here to stay.
Mods should ban and delete more, I have never seen a USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST here.
how many times do you read a poem before you "get" it. 99% of poetry goes over my head and i just don't understand it
You're not supposed to "get" poetry, you just enjoy it.
>>8474865
Pretty much this.
Poetry is able to be wicked plebby but it's poetry, who gives a shit. I'm a published poet and I write my poems based on rhythm and phonetics. I've had people tell me how deep it is and I have a hard time not laughing in their faces.
>>8474865
I disagree somewhat. You "get" it for yourself. I am very critical of people who act like they've objectively interpreted a poem, or people who try to interpret it with references to the author's life and work, but I also disagree with >>8474908, it is not up to you to decide whether someone else's reading is "deep" or not, tbqh.
Why didn't this book stayed in mainstream culture?
>>8474287
because it doesn't fit the spirit of neo-liberalism and people on the left don't require it since they just read existentialism and freud themselves
>>8474306
Is this book considered right wing?
What's its thesis?
>>8474313
That all of culture is a mass coverup of individual mortality. We repress ourselves in the face of the immensity of existence so that we can cope with our finitude.
I don't see how it's right-wing at all really. There isn't much about it that's overtly political.
Post your favorite protagonist. Mine is obviously Toru Watanabe
scribble
>>8474258
The Count
Stoner
I've never been able to enjoy fiction because of my inability to visualize what I read. I see very vague flashes of images but I'm not seeing anything like a "mental movie." What are the best books/authors that don't rely much on visual description?
These books provide an aid for visualization
>>8474251
>>8474264
Rekt
Times when the film adaptation was better than the book
>seriously, the book sucked ass
I don't really agree. The book was much more interesting, but the film was really a fantastic looking film.
Blade Runner. Godfather.
Kubrick's adaptations save for Lolita