What book will fix my life?
>>8535143
how to tie a noose
>>8535143
The catcher in the rye
The hunger games
Letter to a Christian Nation
The God Delusion
God is not Great
Now go. Read.
The Holy Bible
Why does it appeal to normals so much? It's kind of a weird book series to be so popular, considering it is so autistic
>>8535129
Please go back to r9k and never come back
Normies love sex and violence, OP.
>>8535129
>quirky reddit dwarf
>badass girl assassin xD
>omg twists!!!!
Why is this good? I'm 2/3 trough it. but I don't understand why it's so recommended
it's savage
I had that same feeling with this same author but reading 2666. It hit me when I got to page 1000. I haven't finished the last 20 pages. Its been like 2 years
>>8535075
Do you really need an explanation?
If you don't get it, then you don't get it.
I think there are three kinds of people about this:
1-People who get it
2-People who don't get it
3-People who pretend they get it
However, I'm gonna give you guys an advice, you shouldn't start reading Bolaño with The Savage Detectives and you're specially wrong if you started reading Bolaño with 2666 (how can you think that's a good idea, really).
Whatever, go back to the memes
Wild is the music of autumnal winds
Endendros Dendrites
"he who runs among the trees"
Ecolinguistics
Secret language that we're speakin ?
...a branch of metaphysics regarding abstract objects...
...powerful field of influence...
...Nature provides a platform...
The nature of new generation is also influenced by the nature of the new media
i don't even know how to write a book
all writers started that way
chin up cowboy
psssh, what is this amateur hour?
Name a better post-war English novelistYou can't
Graham Greene
Evelyn Waugh
Anthony Powell
Considering confederacy of dunces isn't funny, are there any books that actually are?
Hunger by Knut Hamsun
>>8534908
Ulysses
>>8534908
Twelve Chairs.
>the scene where he pretends to be a chess grandmaster and gives a simul and the opponents first think his blunders are brilliant sacrifices and get scared
I want to become more well-rounded and be able to read the /lit/ top 100 and actually understand them properly, watch films by Bergman and get them without reading an analysis by someone else, and so on...
Besides starting with the Greeks (currently reading Herodotus, and making my way towards Plato, Aristotle, and Plotinus), and the Bible, are the Norton anthologies a good place to start? Are there better anthologies/works that do the same thing? How about for the non-English western canon? I can read French and German, but I want to have something that at least holds my hand a little bit so that I don't miss too much.
I'm thinking of ordering pic related, as well as the Norton Poetry anthology and the one on Theory and Criticism. Would that be a good idea?
>>8534903
This doesn't include philosophy, but you should and you already are reading so don't worry about that.
Myths from Mesopotamia
Iliad and Odyssey
Theogony
Plays from Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides
Aeneid
Ovid's Metamorphoses
The Bible
Beowulf
The Song of Roland
Cantar de mio Cid
Divine Comedy
Decameron
The Canterbury Tales
Orlando Furioso
Lazarillo de Tormes
The Faerie Queene
Shakespeare's Complete
Marlowe's Doctor Faustus
Don Quixote
Paradise Lost
Goethe's Faust
>>8534936
I've already read some of this, but I have the feeling that I'm missing a lot of the meaning in it. I took a look in the Norton Anthology of Poetry and noticed that it had helpful footnotes for things that would be unfamiliar to a layman, and very brief notes in the margins like "repetition" that tell you what each part of the poem is doing, for example. If I just head pick most of those books that you listed off the shelf unedited, I won't have a clue about a third of the things that are going on, and worst of all I might not have a clue that I don't have a clue.
>>8534957
You want to be a Borges overnight? Pick good editions, read what other people that have actually studied the work have to say about it.
Feet on the ground, anon.
What would you guys consider to be "quality reading"? What authors would you recommend?
>>8534877
indie cook books
The Holy Bible
Stephen King
I feel like I'll be more successful here than on /adv/ with my inquiry, so pardon the intrusion if it's unwelcome.
I consider myself pretty capable at identifying proper grammar, most of it is logical, so I was very befuddled when I came across this doozie.
Here's the sentence in question:
>Snapchat is providing advertisers with its users e-mail databases and other data repositories to target consumers
Now, certainly you'd conclude that I missed the apostrophe at the end of users, but consider this:
First, yes, the emails belong to the users, so they are in possession, thus, of course, "users' " should be used. However, the databases possess the users' emails, so it is a database of users' emails. HOWEVER, since snapchat is providing advertisers with its (highest level of possession) databases of users' emails, the possession of the databases is snapchat's.
So, if I used the apostrophe on users, it would confuse the order of possession, which is that snapchat possesses the databases which in turn possess the emails, not snapchat possessing its users' emails ... databases (now suddenly an extra word, or combines to become a noun with emails)
I feel like I'm obviously wrong but if that apostrophe is present, it changes the logical hierarchy of possession.
Obviously, the best solution is to reword it, which I did, but I'm still curious about this.
Lacan?
>>8534857
You're overthinking it.
It's users'
>>8534857
Wtf did I just read
I really like Stalin but I don't know enough about his politics to call myself a Stalinist.
Which books do I read to change that?
Then how the fuck can you like him if you don't know his politics?
>>8534807
kek, good work
Poo by James Daley is pretty illuminating
which language are you learning right now?
how are you learning? any good methods to recommend?
which book is your main goal to be able to read in that language?
>learning spanish
>goal is to read the don quijote original in Español
>>8534786
Perfecting my Latin
Will use it to become fluent in Spanish, French, Italian. As well as build a better foundation for my English Vocabulary.
Already have high level of knowledge of Spanish just a very limited vocabulary. I plan to visit throughout Europe after school and will possibly move to live in South America before the great strife envelops the Western world.
>>8535103
Nice. In this point, south americans are very lucky, although we do not know Latin, it is relatively easy for us to learn french, italin and especially spanish. After learning spanish, I want to learn french and italian, and later on, german.
I know this probably isn't one you want to hear, but ASL. I'm taking a class. Finger spelling shit is fun.
ITT: Post your backlog and others tell you what to read next, if for no other reason than it's easier to just follow a command then to figure out what is actually best to read.
>>8534755
If you have zo many preconditions for reading Ulysses i suggest you also put them on the list
>>8534769
Well there are a couple of reasons why those works aren't on the list:
>I don't know which specific sections of The Bible are relevant, and I don't think it's necessary to read the whole thing front to back to get the most out of Ulysses.
>I don't know the best books on British/Irish history to add to the list
>I've already read Hamlet but I need to remember to re-read it soon before reading Ulysses
>>8534755
Ugh, should I really read up about Irish/British history before I read Ulysses? Should I also have read up on the history before I read Dubliners?
This beautiful six-volume edition of The Bible is coming out soon.
But is the ESV a good translation?
>inb4 kjv or bust
Read the fucking KJV
>>8534715
>Unacceptable for Serious Bible Study:
>The following translations have serious shortcomings of various sorts:
>1) The King James Version (KJV) or The New King James Version (NKJV). The KJV was a great literal translation in its day, but that day was the 17th century! Many earlier and more accurate biblical manuscripts were discovered afterwards and most modern translations—including those produced by very conservative Christians—are based on them. The NKJV updates some of the 17th century language, and I like its literalness, but most of the time it relies on the same late and less accurate manuscripts that were available to the KJV translators in the 17th century.
>>8534726
>Serious Bible Study
What if I just want the most beautiful version?
What are some great poems about prisons and lack of liberty?
“It is said that no one truly knows a nation until one has been inside its jails. A nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but its lowest ones.”
― Nelson Mandela
>>8534695
Notes from the dead house
>>8534695
A prison taint was on everything there. The imprisoned air, the imprisoned light, the imprisoned damps, the imprisoned men, were all deteriorated by confinement. As the captive men were faded and haggard, so the iron was rusty, the stone was slimy, the wood was rotten, the air was faint, the light was dim. Like a well, like a vault, like a tomb, the prison had no knowledge of the brightness outside; and would have kept its polluted atmosphere intact, in one of the spice islands of the Indian Ocean.
CHARLES DICKENS, Little Dorrit
>>8534695
oscar wilde, ballad of reading gaol