Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 3673. page

>>30485082
they work but or more maintenance intensive than modern guns. cz cant make a fucking spring that lasts. if everything's maintained its a nice gun thats comparatively heavy since its steel with a hard to rack slide. its hard to rack since its smaller but its easy to compensate. ergonomics are godlike enough for people to ignore the flaws.
stock triggers are mediocre to pretty decent the more you shoot the smoother it gets. aftermarket triggers are godlike.
for practical use buy a glock for range use cz all the way.
oh yeah toolmarks everywhere

>>30485172
Wanted a CZ for a bit started looking at CGW upgrade packages which has only made it worse. Would run it through it's paces, once at 2k rounds send it off for either pro or defensive offerings.

Previously had a Jericho and regretted trading it off. The CZ tool marks wouldn't bother me long as it functions, springs are replaceable and maintenance is a enjoyable hobby when it comes to pistols. Thanks for the feedback

>>30485339
oh if you do plan on doing a lot of self maintenance buy the safety model. the decocker is a royal pain in the ass to reassemble. the omegas let you swap between having safety or decocker installed but the aftermarket isnt there yet. you wont find omega custom triggers etc.

RIA has affordable 1911s. Glock has some .45 pistols. Those are the common ones I can think of.

I wanna fuck that pumpkin.

>>30485018
Is there a reason you want .45acp? Your selection goes down quite a bit with that ammo. Either way get a Glock trade in or RIA 1911.

>>30484902
>Not living near a reservation to buy fireworks at
Why even celebrate the 4th

>>30484902
Burn it all

>>30484902
>TNT

Go to an actual fireworks store.

>>30484893
Jamomatics with shitty magazine-mounted sights.

>>30484893
no

>>30484893
yes

File: Beaufighter Rockets.jpg (243KB, 636x654px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 636x654px

>Were the rockets of the time not able to fly straight enough to be used against ships?

They were used against ships and U-boats all the time.

Why didn't you look it up before making stupid assumptions?

If you're going to put a torpedo sized rocket on a plane to attack ships, you may as well just use a torpedo

>>30484696
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiny_Tim_(rocket)

>>30484652
I'll stick to my original Remington 51

>>30484652
shitty guns, fat hands.

I don't own, or want either.

>>30484652
>unsupported chamber
>that brass
Absolutely fucking disgusting. No fucking reason for them to have not figured out how to at least do that part of the gun correctly.

>>30484631
hijacking thread, what gun could i buy for 100? would prefer handgun or shotgun to a rifle.

>>30484654
Fuck you, thread terrorist.

>>30484631
don't know what you can find in california, but get a Ruger 10/22 instead if you can. I got hands on that Mossberg and it's the most disgusting thing I've ever touched. and that includes Jennings and Hi Points

>>30484604
leatherman mutt if you have an AR

that's pretty much it

oh and there's a special multi tool for sage stocks

>>30484604
If you want a big one. Leatherman supertool is fucking amazing. It has everything and I haven't broken a thing on mine.

>>30484604
You posted pic related. I love my Wave, never had an issue and nothing has broken on it. Got it in 2012 I think.

>>30484445
come back when you know how to use google, kid.

>>30484474
Google results on this are conflicted as fuck.

>>30484445
Not a real Garand

>>30484381
Looks suspiciously like something being transported on a trailer being covered by some sort of material which is secured by some sort of rope like elements.

I say we nuke China just to be sure.

>>30484419
Sounds reasonable.

Looks like a movie prop

>being attacked
>feign deadly force

what could go wrong?

>>30484351
>pull out BB gun
>attacker doesn't run away
>pew pew
>attacker now really mad and pounds your fucking head into the dirt, beats you to death
>takes BB gun

If you're pulling a weapon it is to stop the imminent danger. A toy gun is not the tool to do that.

>>30484366
I'd imagine a 4.5mm steel ball, coming at over 100m/s would penetrate skin, and depending on the shot placement, would cause a lot of pain, don't you think? And the kind of guns I'm talking about are semi-automatic, with 18-20 round mags (+additional ones in reserve possibly). I suppose it would be better than nothing, right?

>>30484345
If you can somehow get your hands on one

>>30484345
These are the real fucking questions.

>>30484345
Get a CNC mill. Make it yourself. Law doesn't stop you from owing a minigun either. As long as it was pre-ban.

>>30484321
There's already a general you fucking nigger

>>30484321
I've always thought the handle looks pretty secure for a small knife

>>30484355
Generals are only created so the same people know where to go for their circle jerk, random treads are usually more productive

>>30484257
>pls respond
>respond
>pls

thx for nothing, fags

First off, its beem 10 minutes.
Secondly, fucking kill yourself

>>30484375
i'm most definitely not going to do that

but thx for responding

>>30484211
nice. i want one bad.

>>30484211
yes
inb4 squishy goes squish

>>30484211
For a first that is interesting but it is good gun