Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 2023. page

>>32951518
that looks stupid.

>>32951518
it can be practical and look good, but your friend was ripped off

that pic is disgusting. If somebody tried to charge me $400 for that piece of shit I would kill every man, woman and child in their village, burn it to the ground and salt the earth, the neighboring villages too, future historians will never know they existed and their shame will be lost to the ages.

>>32951518
They literally poked it with a soldering iron a bunch of times. They were probably laughing their ass off the whole time thinking about the $400, too.

>>32951445
Little bit older than the African children that use them, but yeah.

>>32951445
Didn't know Santa clause was operator

File: Steve_Vanasse2.jpg (146KB, 1905x1005px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1905x1005px

>>32951445

>>32951343
reliable CZ clone.

ain't nothin wrong, with a bit of bump and grind

>>32951343
I mean, it's the last one on the list of CZ copys. It goes bang and is affordable. If only those EAA faggots would ship to the US I could get a new barrel for my Jericho.

If you want a 10mm CZ that's the gun for you.
If you're a spaghettiboo and want a CZ that's the gun for you.
Otherwise just get a CZ.

also post interesting pics of subject related

how does uranium or platonium go critical?
and why does it have to be uranium why does it have to be uranium or platonium?
doesn't it seem like this technology is out of the bag and any determined country should be able to acquire nukes?

Is Oppenheimer still around? The tripfag? He seemed pretty cool, knew a lot about nukes.

File: 1482016937581.jpg (2MB, 3029x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3029x2448px

ammo innamail

File: DSC_0422.jpg (905KB, 1200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

905KB, 1200x1800px

ok lets not do that again for at least a few hours

>>32951083
Different people are affected by fatigue differently. As long as you're in shape and conditioned. It won't be bad. If you're a softbody, just stop and give me 10.
>is not being able to hold your rifle up in combat due to fatigue an issue
Don't know.
>weight
Depends.

>>32951083
>how badly are you affected by the fatigue?
Personally not that much, i.e. I can still hit a man-sized target pretty well but there is a noticeable difference in accuracy.
>Is this an issue or not?
It is but how big it is depends on the individual.
>And how much weight does a typical soldier carry?
Hard to say, because I was an atypical soldier. Chest rig weighed about 8 kg, small backpack maybe 10 kg and rucksack anywhere from 20 to 40 kg depending on what I was doing. Add to that the clothes I was wearing, the rifle I was carrying and other stuff I may have had. Overall I guess the whole load was between 35 and 55 kg with the rucksack and 15 to 25 kg without. If there were heavy anti-tank weapons and mines or other large stuff involved, it was 10 to 20 kg more.

>>32951083
How much weight did I carry. Approximately 90 pounds. I am able to do the math based on every piece of gear, I've broken it down before. Minimum 70 UpTo 100.

I was a SAW gunner, we carry the Lmg and a shit ton of ammo.

Fatigue is huge. Don't let anyone on this thread say otherwise. Strength to a point but it's all about endurance.

Also, just for record keeping purposes, I was a USMC 0311, not an 11b. So our shit is more or less the same but just telling you.

File: marty robbins.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

>>32950934
When in doubt. BIG IRON.

File: FullSizeRender.jpg (335KB, 1224x1224px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1224x1224px

>>32950934
When cowboy guns are the subject, longer is better.

>>32951519
>When cowboy guns are the subject, longer is better.
I've held the arty model before, and even that felt a little big. I got medium sized hands, so I don't know how the cavalry model will fit.

Do you have more pics of that open top? I have that one saved from another thread lol

>>32950918
Are you .Mil or a contractor?

>>32950918
You ever get hard at work?

>>32950918
What are the fake missiles for?

File: k98boltbent.jpg (37KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 1024x768px

And here's a picture of a Bent Bolt.

So the bolt is less likely to catch and snag on stuff.

>>32950824
Less travel from trigger to bolt
The Nazi were tacticalfags

>>32950762
Please do.

File: IMAG2580.jpg (2MB, 2688x1520px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2688x1520px

Right off the bat you'll notice ambi controls.

Keep in mind this example is a prototype, the finish on the frame is rough because the majority of it is 3D printed. Production models will be cleaner and injection molded.

File: IMAG2581.jpg (2MB, 2688x1520px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2688x1520px

The pistol takes readily available Glock mags, huge plus.

It also features a keymod interface on the bottom of the suppressor for a rail segment or something.

>>32950674
>tries to say its Afghanistan
>being that full of shit

File: 3.jpg (186KB, 1126x773px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1126x773px

>>32950551

>noname barrel
I haven't built it yet so haven't picked a brand, what would you get?

>UTG rail
I think it looks cool, I get that /k/ hates keymod but whatever

>MRO
Is it not a good red dot sight? From what I've read its awesome but do you think something with magnification would be better?

>PSA bolt
Ok PSA isn't top of the line, what would you recommend instead?

>Law folder on a 16" rifle

>2017
>not being able to collapse the stock of every rifle you own
>>32950561

>Who makes the barrel?

I haven't picked one yet, what do you think?

>UTG is pretty low on the Gucci scale (not even on the scoreboard) but normie fags seem to like them

I think it looks cool, but am more concerned with reliability/longevity and it seems find

>Why ETS mags over magpul or lancer?

because they're translucent, $20 each, and have built in couplers. I already started buying some and smashing them on things and they seem pretty sturdy. The website says they are resistant to heat, cold, chemical, corrosion, etc. One thing I noticed is that plastic/metal mags tend to get cracked/broken feed lips from dropping but the ETS mags feel like a softer/more malleable plastic which would bend more under stress.

>>32950707
just stop

File: IMG_0282.jpg (3MB, 2592x1728px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2592x1728px

>>32950555

id talk shit, but i have one too

>>32950566
i love your gun rack

>>32950555
I hate /k/ now thats been invaded by Reddit
you cant get halfway through a thread without seeing
>REEE GB2 POOL!!!!!!

>>32950601
Wtf is a reddit?

File: images.png (11KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 275x183px

>>32950309

SHALL

File: Riggs_lethal_weapon.jpg (16KB, 300x210px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x210px

>>32950335
NOT

File: DILLON.png (1MB, 845x907px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 845x907px

>>32950347
BE

>implying you can stop a 15 year old from showing you the dankest 2009 memes they just picked up

>>32950217

>15:1
>impressive


why dont you post the other jets' scores and who they faced.

some scored 25:1 against the F-35 IIRC

>>32950237
That's a cool source you've got there

>>32950214
Whatever we can do to keep retards from calling everything an "assault rifle" is fine by me.
I like the term too, so that's a bonus.

File: 1330331821356.jpg (6KB, 139x146px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 139x146px

>>32950214

AR-16 STANDS FOR ASSULT RIFALE, I KNOW CUS THAT WUT FOXS AND CNN CAL IT

File: 1467600085547-1.png (686KB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 2560x1600px

>>32950214
I think
>modern sporting rifle
is a pretty good term from a propaganda perspective (which let's be honest, is the intended purpose of the term.) This term is good for two primary reasons:
1. "Modern." Everyone wants to be modern. Being called "old fashioned" is an insult to the sort of low-information anti-gun DNC voter this terminology is intended for.
2. "Sporting." Everyone likes sports, or at least respects sport as a legitimate peaceful hobby. This term doesn't bring to mind any sort of violence (either assault or defense. Remember that even violence in self defense makes anti-gunners feel uncomfortable in a way that sport shooting doesn't).

>self loading rifle
This is fine but a bit too functional. It lacks much emotional impact

>repeating rifle
The problem here is people think of lever guns. Also "repeating" is a bit too functional and it's easy for liberals to be afraid of "repeating" anyway, reducing it's propaganda effectivness

>defensive rifle
Sounds too reactionary. If you say "defensive rifle" people will think that's just a reaction to "assault rifle", which of course it is, which reduces it's propaganda effectiveness.