Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 4283. page

File: 1_vd-starwarshan-408x264[1].jpg (18KB, 408x229px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 408x229px

It's true, all of it. The jews, the stabs in the back, they're real

>>301642

sources pls

>>301593
the jews are a race of reptile human hybrids bread by the alien reptiles to control the world. The reptiles are yaweh and adam and eve were the 1st male and female hybrids. So far they have succeeded to destroy humanity and the reptiles orbiting our planet will take over. The jews didn't just take the form of humans though, there were also jewish hybrids that were responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs and the rise of the mammals.

I heard he copied all his ideas from other philosophers

obscurantism

>>301578
Simulacrum is, well.

Do you know what a cargo cult is? Essentially it's tribals constructing crude copies of airforce that used to be stationed on their islands, thinking that if they copy it hard enough, humanitarian aid that came with the airforce will reappear.

Now imagine people who're constructing something that doesn't even exist, yet vehemently claim it's real. That is simulacrum; not just "shape over substance" but "shape without substance".

At least that's how I understand it.

Depends man

>>301568
Personally, I think war would be inevitable. Both empires are conquest based, and arguably conquest would be necessary for survival. Also one other assumption, they are not separated by water. On the same continent.

>>301572
>But that's...like...just your opinion man.
Kek

>locked himself in a room for a week to kick an addiction to a sleeping pill cold turkey

>>301462

>was a manlet

he was bretty gud for a child soldier desu

File: trash.jpg (58KB, 700x479px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 700x479px

>ameripoor only known for killing people

>>301401
there are a lot of denominations, senpai

>>301401
Literally Luther

>>301427
based post

Christs may come and Christs may go, but Caesar is forever.

>>301241
Play the game.

He's reponding to people trying to trick him into taking a side in the Roman/Judean conflict.

He's pretty much saying he doesn't give a fuck about politics.

>Specifically, in my study of primitive cultures, I found the following statistically significant social-behavioral characteristics of cultures that punished pre-marital and/or extra-marital sex: 1) slavery is present; 2) low female income; 3) personal crime is high; 4) kin group is patrilineal; 5) wives are "purchased"; 6) sex disability is present; 7) intensity of sex anxiety is high; 8) castration anxiety is high; 9) bellicosity is extreme; 10) military glory is strongly emphasized; 11) killing, torturing and mutilation of enemy captured in warfare is high; 12) a high god is involved in human morality; and 13) supernaturals of the culture are aggressive and violent.

>The opposite patterns of behavior were found to characterize those cultures that accepted pre-marital and extra-marital sexuality. For any objective observer of contemporary cultures, it is apparent that the above patterns found for primitive cultures also characterize modern cultures. The greater the sexual restrictions on the female the greater is the violence of that culture. Why? And what are its implications for a major reconstruction of the male-female sexual relationship; the family and children; and society?


sorry for the wall posts

tl;dr monogamy only breeds stupidity and violence

>Before answering these questions it is important to note that some of the above relationships in the human primate have also been observed, in part, in certain non-human primate species. For example, in those non-human primate troops where the female freely mates with most or all of the males in the troop it has been found that the males are typically protective of the female and her offspring.

>The opposite pattern is typically found in the harem organized troops (one male having exclusive sexual access and dominance over the females in the troop). When the Alpha male is displaced by a new male in the harem organized troop the new Alpha male will typically kill the nursing offspring sired by the previous Alpha male. Sociobiologists interpret these events as evidence for the new male acting to promote his "genetic" fitness over the prior Alpha male. I strongly oppose this interpretation. A more plausible interpretation is the exercise of dominance and power over the female which is accomplished by the male mounting the female. This is not possible with a nursing female, thus, the nursing infant is killed so that the female can recycle, become sexually receptive and be mounted by the new Alpha male.

>>301065
>>"Why should it be "moral" for a man to have sexual access to many females
Its not. The retarded idea that it was is what lead to women aping men and becoming equally promiscuous.

Describe what you believe.

>>301003
It is extremely crude at the moment and is likely to be derivative and better expressed by somebody who I have yet to read. I accept the basic nihilist premise, that ascribing any form of meaning to life is a distraction from life itself. Life is merely the passing of time, which, when we are aware of it, transfers from boredom to horror to dread. Now, I believe that rather than creating some kind of ideal to strive to, we must accept the world for what it is, be confidant in our understanding that there is no meaning and behave accordingly. My own form does not yet exclude any kind of behaviour, suicide would be permitted if it was performed out of the realisation that one cannot satisfy the desires which they have.

>>300990
I used to be and still sort of think like one.

>>300874
You realize that the real Hamilton wasn't black, right?

Still like him now?

>Hamilton
>kekold to bankers

Federal Reserve Defense Force GTFO muh /his/

>>300888
who cares, race is a social construct

Hamilton did help found the New York Manumission Society which one of the first anti-slavery organizations in the United States, so yes, even by today's standards: Hamilton would be able to run for office.

>>300858
That's not nationalism, desu. Nationalism is connected with the system of the nation-state, which began in the 19th century.

It wasn't political nationalism though, they didn't try to unite Greek people under one flag, and they had no problems with allying "barbarians" against each other from Peloponnese War onward.

Nationalism =/= "ethnicities exist". It's more about the concept of a nation state which really didn't exist until the late 18th / early 19th century.

>>300739
The Jordan Legion made a good account of itself in the original 1948 war.

Have you read this fampai?

http://www.meforum.org/441/why-arabs-lose-wars

Arab rebels working with Lawrence?

Then again, depends on what you mean by modern.

>>300569
>When did the American accent start to develop, and when did the American people generally stop sounding British?

It didnt
Americans speak the way Brits spoke in 18th century
Meanwhile, British accent degenerated from 1783 to nowdays into the faggy thing it's now

The British accent that you, for example, hear on BBC is fairly new.

During the founding of America both the Americans and the British would of had an accent that sounded somewhat like a modern Scottish accent.

The HBO miniseries John Adams does the best job of demonstrating that accent.

>>300728
Wow, so britain and japan were culturally destroyed by losing wars? That's scary.

Utterly useless leader. Lead Egypt right down into the toilet.

Objectively, it's hard to argue with the House of Saud being the best managers in the Arab world.

>>300573
Get out wahhabi scum

>>300577
You seem to forget Nasser was the next thing to a communist, and utterly destroyed the Egyptian economy, in addition to leading it into multiple disastrous wars.

>>300490
>waahhh I want to waste my time circlejerking over the Romans or Nazis wahhh

>>300490
Have you seen the (abject lack of) quality of the historical discussion on this board?

Also nice meta-thread faggot.

>>300526
Only reason it lacks quality is because the humanities side keeps wanting to circlejerk in those threads.

without them it would be more about historical facts and events rather than "Was eugenics a good thing?"

>>300411
But Napoleon was Italian

Italy used all of its warrior points during roman era

>>300461
>Italians
>Roman