How accurate /his?
not at all
Germany stood more to lose in North Africa than Italy did.
Suez was a huge key to international shipping, and the Middle East had a bunch of oil that the German war machine desperately needed.
If anything, Hitler severely underestimated the importance of the African theater.
not at all
ITT: We discuss what could've been the best nation in all history, why it failed, and what could've changed if it actually succeded
>>591786
You can fuck off and go kill yourself, Narcolombia.
>>591801
>Narcolombia
>Not realizing this was Bolivar's dream, the greatest man from this continent
Jokes on you
>best nation in all history
>run by the most backwards people in Western Europe
No
What went wrong /his/?
>mindblowingly advanced maths (Archimedes almost invented Calculus)
>built machines and analog computers (Antikythera mechanism)
>most impressive realistic sculpting in history (pic related)
>society of many philosophical viewpoints
>religious freedom
>sexual freedom, full tolerance of homosexuality
>Olympic games
>refined naval and land warfare
>architecture, science, politics and so much more
And this is what happened to it:
>Invaded by innumerate Romans
>Converted by intolerant Christians
>>591357
Antikythera mechanism
There wasn't a full tolerance of homosexuality at all.
>>591365
A method for calculating pi by Archimedes.
Why was the eastern half so much richer than the west? Was it solely because of the silk road, or were there other factors?
>>591163
And Egypt.
East was always the richest area.
>>591163
Trade with middle east and africa. Middle east is also the proxy for India/China
>>591166
This, Constantinople's location also helped with trade and taxes from ships travelling through and since it was mostly ignored by the huns it retained much of its wealth after the fall of the western half
Dare to dream...
haha
no
>>590876
Ja.
Every German secretly dreams about this.
Why is the concept of inheritance slowly losing value to most? Has society moved past the concept of legacy/become apathetic?
People don't think about the future anymore. Nihilism has taken over.
>>590558
The Welfare state has made it so that it's entirely unnecessary to leave one for your children. You can spend your whole life looking out for yourself and your carrier, and not have to worry about their future because someone else will be there to pick up your slack.
>The Renaissance was a peaceful era
>"The Dark Ages"
>The Renaissance was a peaceful era
Now you're just making shit up, no one says that.
>>590527
they were dark you dumb sperglord
fucking christian apologetics ffs
Now, we are all familiar with the paradox of Theseus' Ship, or Grandfather's axe as it is known to some. The dilemma when original ceases to be original when parts are being replaced.
Now with the modern medicine and science, we can replace most human parts. When do you cease to be the original you and become a new you? Brain seems to be the final frontier in this case, as we have no idea how it works or how to replace it. And is it even replaceable. Is our mind the product of our brain, or is some ether from the outerworlds?
I know SJW's and nu-newwave feminists get a lot of shit in here (and most of their arguments and ideas are plain silly). But they do raise a bigger question on what does it mean to be me or even human.
Will this be the century that we will see first non-human humans. Shallow and flawed mind of the human, living in a body perfected by the machines?
Jesus christ you are retarded.
The paradox of Theseus' Ship can not ba applied to any living self regulating organism. The human body knows when a part of it does not belong. It has means of accessing this and it spits out shit that shouldn't be there.
Congrats we don't really exist in any essential, discrete way and the ground of being is nothingness, you're officially a buddhist
The one that really fucks with my mind:
It's the future. We have the technology to completely create people artificially, from scratch. A clone of is made of me, perfectly cloned in the physical sence. Then the entire contents of my brain is copied to a computer, and inserted into the clone. What happens to my frame of reference? Will "I" experience the world from two bodies now, myself and the clone? Who is truely "me"? Both the original me, and the clone? The clone is so perfect that not even my family can tell the difference. Am i not then the clone? Can i see the world through his eyes? Fuck.
Did the autism at Manzikert doom the Roman Empire or was it on the road to recovery until the 4th crusade?
Well i don't know too much about the battle(though i'm greek) but going against turks(seljuks) using turks(Patzinaks and others) is pretty retarded.
Anyone else have some ideas? I'd like to know where it all went wrong.
>>590276
I'd say Manzikert was a symptom of the Empire's problems more than the cause. He fielded an army composed of mercenaries who weren't dedicated to the empire, and he returned from his captivity to a civil war and was blinded. Seems like the situation was pretty bad for the empire in general.
Are there any philosophers/ideologies that encourage victim mindsets or blaming others for their problems? I'm working on a story and one of the cities is built around this ideology I'm looking for as a way to control its people (thinking is dangerous, it's ok to submit our higher authority because you're weak, etc.) The reason I want an underlying philosophy is so the reasoning of the leaders is deeper than 'spooky scary government is out to get you', and I want to know the major reasons why that philosophy should be implemented.
>>589654
>Are there any philosophers/ideologies that encourage victim mindsets or blaming others for their problems
Early Christianity was literally victim worship and about blaming the Jews and Romans for everything bad in the world. Saint Augestine blamed earth quake's on Roman Paganism.
>>589705
But the Jews and Romans were also responsible for the crucifiction and thus for the eventual salvation of mankind. Sin has an important place in theodicy.
>>589654
Communism
t.Nietzsche
Why do Capitalists circlejerk over Adam Smith so much?
Not only are Adam Smiths economic theories based on an incredibly basic LTV completely bunk, many of the moral arguments he used for market interactions, such as The Invisible Hand, were completely and utterly debunked by Globalization and Capitalist Imperialism.
It also seems bizarre I keep getting Libertarians and Austrian Econ fags throwing "But muh the Invisible hand" at me when they don't even know what the fuck The Invisible Hand even refers too from The Theory of Moral Sentiments and how it refers to reinvestment into domestic production because of "muh nationalist feels" (generalizing it of course)
I honestly don't get the circlejerking over him, he wasn't even talking about fucking Capitalism as it's modern definition from the 19th century for fuck sake.
>>589151
Sure is TANKY in here tonight.
He's the founding father. People still consider Darwin and Tesla geniuses even though their ideas have been updated. Why should Adam Smith be treating differently? You can admire Smith and Hayek you don't have to choose the most recent guy.
>>589151
>fags throwing "But muh the Invisible hand" at me
that's a pretty basic indication that the person talking to you doesn't know what you're talking about desu
Rate Attractiveness: Historical Edition
I'll start.
>>588976
Sometimes I can't believe that guy is Joseph Stalin. But he lacks glorious Habsburg chin
>>588976
7/10
>>588994
10/10
>>588976
11/10
>>588994
-11/10
>>589017
9/10
Which historical leader is the ultimate "chaotic good"?
>>588743
Not that one, that's for fucking sure.
>pic related
America, leader of the world
>>588746
Pinochet did nothing wrong. Lawful Good all the way
"Sometimes, democracy must be bathed in blood"
How might Japan have won, or at least pull off a draw, in the Pacific War?
Say it's January 1942 and you're running the show. The war is already on so how do you win?
Not start the war in the first place. Concede china to the american sphere of influence. That's about it.
>>588365
They couldn't. At best they could have dragged the war out.
>>588365
By January of 1942, it's already too late. There is 0 way to win a total war with the U.S., no matter how well you fight: Even with allocating the bulk of their resources to Europe, the U.S. outproduced Japan in important metrics, like carriers, by about 8:1; and those Essex carriers held more and better aircraft than what the Japanese are fielding. No amount of tactical success is going to hold off that tide if the U.S. really wants you dead.
Therefore, the only way you have a chance is to to the attrition-coercion route: You don't win, but you're expensive and bloody and dangerous enough that the U.S. doesn't think it's worth it to keep fighting and you can negotiate a peace with honor.
Unfortunately for Japan, the sneak attack at Pearl Harbor scuttled any such chances of that happening, and this was an ideological war to win and crush Japan into the dirt and break them forever, and damn the cost.
If you want to have a chance, you need to alter that underlying fact, the political pinning of the war; and to do that, you can't strike first. Best would be to respond to the American oil embargo by attacking the NEI and calling FDR's bluff that he would defend the Dutch government-in-exile. If they do declare war, loudly proclaim how you're fighting to protect innocent Asian people from perfidious colonial imperialists; like the U.S. which are threatening to do the same to them. Get involved in the press, the American press, but in the meantime defend hard, and knock out Guam and the Philipines, you can't afford those in your rear, but only AFTER the U.S. declares war.
Block off the sea of Japan to Lend-Lease, and give diplomatic assurances to FDR (whose main priority is and always was Europe) that you'd allow the Americans to ship through to Vladivostok and even use your own ports in Manchuria and Korea in exchange for a cessation of hostilities, and maybe work towards a larger peace deal.
>one of the most elegant and beautiful metaphysics ever devised
>God-tier theodicy, explains evil without sacrificing the goodness of the divine
>God-tier aesthetics, beauty as the path to God
>blew Gnosticism the fuck out
>Rational but spiritual, logical but passionate, argumentatively rigorous but poetic
>compatible with all but the most Walmart-tier religions
>Founder purportedly achieved oneness with the divine on three separate occasions in his life
>it shows
Why aren't you Neoplatonist yet /his/?
Sounds good. Where do I start?
>>588199
His Enneads if you wanna dive into the deep end. Read his wiki page if you wanna get a solid overview
>tfw golden soul