So I was looking through this old collection of photos of women from the American Wild West in the 19th century, and the women were either models or madams or "soiled doves", and I noticed half the women were what we would consider chubby, and half of those cub tubs were definitely on the fat side. So what the hell, was this actually considered attractive back then? It makes less sense to me when you consider the fact that many women wore corsets back then plus any illustrations of ideal women back then, like the Gibson Girls, show them to be physically fit and thin like how people like women today.
>>592435
When there is very easy access to food, abstention is attractive.
When there is little access to food, plumpness is attractive.
Only in modern times is being skinny considered attractive.
>>592450
Physical fitness is always attractive.
>yfw you realize that tumblr landwhales actually would be better suited for wild west prostitute movie roles
They are still active?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teutonic_Order
>>592270
Yes. You can even join if you're a German noble.
>>592400
What if you're a direct descendant of a German noble that had to flee East Germany after the war?
So why didn't the Pope just have Luther burned at the stake?
>>592218
would have pissed people off more
>Why doesn't Israel just genocide the palestinians?
> Why didn't Stalin just kill all his enemies?
How responsible were Neville Chamberlain and Stanley Baldwin for WWII through their appeasement policies, and Baldwin's inaction over the militarization of the Rhineland?
>>592051
The UK and the US are the reason for WW2 of course.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-German_Naval_Agreement
>Signed the day of the battle of Waterloo
And then the Anglos will complain about the fall of France.
>>592051
>That result
I still cry at night
>>592051
You have to consider the appeasement policy through the lenses of European balance of power diplomatic policy to answer that question anon.
What is it, and why does it work so well?
>>591969
>person with agency has the means to provide agency to others in the set of folks related to that person
>repeat ad infinitum
>another dimension to the feedback cycles that produce power hierarchies
its not that tough just give your shit to who you fuck with
>>593181
Jews actually just flat out copied the WASPs. Read any of the sources criticizing the Anglo-American upper class:
>nepotistic
>rich & parasitic
>controlling the banks
>controlling the media
>exploiting the workers
>sowing conflict
You know how the SJWs chimp out over everything white, that's just a remnant from the late 19th century.
>people still insist fins are descended from asian mongols
>it has been proven finnic tribes have been in europe for thousands of years
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????/???????????????????????????????????????
>>591895
They share linguistic and genetic similarities to East Asians. Calling them Mongols is just a joke, no one thinks they're the ancestors of actual Mongols.
>>591895
It's a joke
>>591913
Not East-Asians, the furthest it goes is Siberia, with the vast majority of the Finno-Ugric people living on the European side of the Ural mountains.
>God issues a commandment not to kill
>people kill in His name
Humanity is pretty much retarded
>>591767
>God issues a commandment not to kill
But that's wrong you retard. It's
לא תרצח
not
לא תהרג
>>591783
Fuck off Jewnigger
Post good historical documentaries/series
Pawn Stars
Deadliest Warrior
Ancient Special Forces
Bettany Hughes did a series of great ones for Channel 4. They're on all4 if you're in the UK.
Also, dat thinking mans crumpet.
>>591753
You forgot Ancient Aliens!
Hello, /his.
Quick question:
Where can I find free resources in public domain to learn about history ? I'm tired of being a commoner and I want to partake in your patrician tastes. Is there any good youtube channel, for example? Or maybe a good blog or site?
how about a library you retard
>>591726
this
Fuck the public domain:
Bookzz.org
Why did America declare independence?
>Taxation without representation?
>GB choosing to appease their Native allies West of the Appalachians over their colonial subjects desire to colonize it?
>Enlightenment idealism and perception of Parliamentarian corruption?
>GB granting Catholics freedom of worship?
>Coercive acts?
>The American colonies were founded through private enterprise with little government support from the very beginning? And GB was attempting to extend their reach over their loyal, but autonomy desiring subjects; believing they were owed something after sending as few troops as possible to protect the colonies during the 7 years war?
>Jews?
>>591598
Heres a better question OP
america is a continent not a country
mexicans are americans in the same way chinese are asian and germans are european
So what are people from the US called? united statesians?
>>591598
Because ultimately, it's more efficient to be self governed, especially when you had a seperate "American" identity forming from the homeland "British" identity, and you live in a world without instantaneous communications.
>>593527
Shut up, butthurt South American.
Why is studying history and the humanities so comfy, yet job prospects and opportunites virtually nonexistent besides K-12 history and English teachers?
>>591559
>tfw history graduate and call centre worker
>tfw when straight A science and maths student at school
>tfw when I just had a cool history teacher that made it sound like fun
Never mind. I enjoyed it. And it was, indeed, comfy as fugg.
At the end of the day the choices I made have their causation from a chain of events going back to the Big Bang and maybe beyond and I also really like my job anyway.
The one choice in life is between, suicide, philosophical suicide and accepting the absurd and finding meaning and happiness in life anyway.
Every discipline gets the job market it deserves.
Because marketable skills revolve around the services you can provide for others, that they'd be willing to pay for. Studying history and the humanities doesn't equip you with practical skills that are in-demand in this economy.
show me a better government
protip:
you can't.
>>591552
Sure, if the ruler is good. Most times they're not, and then what?
Every Nation gets the Government it deserves.
that's what I thought
OP how are you so awesome?
I close my eyes and see a flock of birds. The vision lasts a second or perhaps less; I don’t know how many birds I saw. Were they a definite or an indefinite number? This problem involves the question of the existence of God. If God exists, the number is definite, because how many birds I saw is known to God. If God does not exist, the number is indefinite, because nobody was able to take count. In this case, I saw fewer than ten birds (let’s say) and more than one; but I did not see nine, eight, seven, six, five, four, three, or two birds. I saw a number between ten and one, but not nine, eight, seven, six, five, etc. That number, as a whole number, is inconceivable; ergo, God exists.
>I close my eyes and see a flock of birds
No, you see birds when your eyes are open. That's how vision works.
Existence precedes essence, and basing an argument on a subjective "mental image" visible only to you is pretty piss poor evidence. I also don't believe a lot of your conclusions are logically inferred from your premises, which can be rejected outright without much trouble anyway. It's telling that theists have to resort to these sort of ontological mind games.
>If God exists, the number is definite, because how many birds I saw is known to God.
Clearly you didn't see any. You vaguely imagined some of the properties a flock of birds has. God could also care and not choose to watch; the idea that God has to be omnipotent and omniscient is a Christian concept that historically didn't apply to deities as a whole.
>That number, as a whole number, is inconceivable; ergo, God exists.
There's no logical reason inconceivable things couldn't exist in an atheistic universe. All it requires is that all the workings of the unconscious mind do not occupy our immediate conscious experience, or that our sensory organs are unable to detect something.
What if there was a half of a bird among them?
Who does /his/ think is better?
The West Clausewitz or the East Sun Tzu?
personally ive read all of Sun Tzu's Art of War but Calusewitz's On War seems to be the better book? Thoughts?
interesting article to go along with it
http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/158123
>>591411
Sun Tzu's teachings are very general guidelines. They're fundamentals you absolutely need to know if you have to even be near a command position but they're just guidelines. Also, some of it needs some conceptualization to be transposed into modern situations, particularly his teachings about supplies, intelligence, and the politics behind war.
Clausewitz on the other hand is more recent and introduces major points of modern military science like the fog of war or the idea that war is nothing but an extension of politics.
Both are classics and need to be read, but if I absolutely had to choose one at gunpoint, I'd pick Sun Tzu for his more universal character. Just be sure not to take every single word at face value, shit gets almost esoteric at times.
>>594048
This. Sun Tzu keeps it very simple, and just about everyone can follow his tactics, from an American general to a Boko Haram warlord
>>594054
Its actually surprising how many modern commanders do not follow his simple guidelines.
What does love mean to you? What do you think about it? Does everyone deserve to love and be loved? Is it right or possible to love everybody?
>>591336
Love is the only thing that matters in my life. Love of one, of many, of all.
>>591336
It's just chemical reactions, it's as meaningless as everything else.
>>591355
Can you explain how does it work or something?