ITT: Examples of history repeating itself.
>>918525
Afghanistan, aka the grave of empires
Just Germany being germany.
>>918540
What's repeating apart from people disagreeing?
Hey you!
Post in this thread, then using the name you get, find any history about that name and post it here! If you can't find anything for the full name, try using juts the surname!
The most interesting post wins!
GO!
>>918266
Rolling
Okay.
>>918270
welp just a facebook name
Let's talk WWII memoirs or journals/diaries or otherwise first hand accounts, any nationality or type of experience (military, civilian, prisoner, etc).
Some talking points:
Did you have to read any first-hand WWII accounts in school? Are there any you think should be taught in schools but typically aren't?
What are some first-hand accounts that have stuck with you? Any you didn't care for?
What are your thoughts on the censorship or editing of first-hand accounts, such as the initial censorship of Anne Frank's diary? Is it harmful to censor or edit these accounts--particularly if the person died during the war--or is it ever acceptable?
Isn't that picture on the cover of German troops storming Norway?
>>916957
Yep! Makes for a dramatic cover though.
Well i always got the Memoirs of my grandgranddad from ww1 and the time before it and the accounts of my granddad from ww2 till 44, to read. Too bad he quit writing in 43. On the topic of editing, if it is a firsthand/memoir then editi g by someone else than the author especially with an agenda behind it, is absolutely disgusting
>Artaxerxes III Ochus of Persia /ˌɑːrtəˈzɜːrksiːz/ c. 425 BC – 338 BC; (Old Persian: ARATAXASHASSA Artaxšaçā)[2] was the Great King of Persia and the eleventh king of the Achaemenid Empire, as well as the first Pharaoh of the 31st dynasty of Egypt.
>He was the son and successor of Artaxerxes II and was succeeded by his son, Arses of Persia (also known as Artaxerxes IV). His reign coincided with the reign of Philip II in Macedon and Nectanebo II in Egypt.
From what I understand, he was generally viewed as a highly energetic and effective king, able to return the Persian Empire back to a more stable state, saw a lot of success in restoring the prestige and power of the Persians as the world's greatest power; this includes regaining lost territory from both the Spartans and Athenians, recovering the Ionian Greek colonies and most of coastal Asia Minor and reconquering Egypt.
Aterxerxes III was also able to crush several rebellions which were backed by large mercenary bands of Greek soldiers at Cyprus and Sidon. But more relevant to anything else here, he was able to weaken and curb the power of the western satraps/governors and reduce their household and provincial standing armies so reduce the possibility of rebellion. And he was able to once warned about Philip II's threat, checked his advances in Greece until his assassination.
How much different would it have been if the hyper-competent Atarxerxes III, who was a noted soldier and experienced general; had faced Philip II or Alexander instead of his weak successor, Darius III?
>>916744
Bump
>>916744
Interested anon bumping
>>919455
Thanks
By functioning, I mean
>Free healthcare
>Very good healthcare to the extent that people from France, Germany and UK were flying over for operations and procedures.
>Free education
>Brilliant "arts thinkers" and science programmes so advance, they sold rocket technology to both the Russians and Americans
>Free housing
>Comfy and roomy homes easily capable of withstanding the schizophrenic weather that the Balkans endures (freezing winters, boiling summers)
>Comprehensive transport links
>You want to go to the coast? Jump on a train. Need to see your girlfriend's parents in another state? Smooth roads linking city to city.
>Full employment
>Work weighing you down? Enjoy more mandated leave than most countries in Western Europe
>Worried about overbearing external influences?
>Don't worry. Tito is playing both the Yanks and the Ruskies.
>SUCCESSFULLY
>Want to chat shit about Tito?
>Why the fuck would you?
>Muh Nationalism?
>Seriously?
>Fuck you.
>Goli Otok.
I won't even bother with describing the other potential examples.
Instead, I will simply name them.
USSR
VIETNAM
BEST KOREA
CHINA
SOME SHITTY UKRAINIAN ENCLAVE FOR ABOUT A WEEK
A COUPLE OF AFRICAN DESPOT BLACK HOLES
So /his/torians.
Vindicate or challenge me.
>>918260
Take this to /pol/, Myron
>>918269
It's a legitimate question for the board.
I'm patently biased but the premise is still legit.
>>918260
It fell apart.
Ok /his/ story time
>be me last year Junior theology class ( fuck off I'm 18 now )
>my theology teacher is fucking idiot
>gets asked a question about the moral teachings of the church ie gay marriage ect
>this kid who asks the question is a smart kid can debate fairly well sometimes we debate theology together
>he's Agnostic I'm Catholic
>my teacher gives FUCKING 5 MINUTE ANSWERS TO QUESTION I COULD ANSWER IN 30 SECONDS
>Doesn't know answers to questions he should expect to be asked
>dodges questions stumbles on words
>completely stumped
>I always leave his class pissed that I know more about theology than MY FUCKING THEOLOGY TEACHER
>I talk to the kid after school to have actually intelligent discussions on theology since my teacher can't
>more kids who are more intellectual join in
>we pretty much have our own theology debate club because of this fucking teacher can't satisfy us
Anyone else have stories about terrible theology/history teachers you had
>>916731
In 9th grade my history teacher tried to convince me that Rome was the biggest empire ever by land area.
>>916758
Never heard of Mongolia huh
>>916773
That was the first thing I mentioned, but she said it technically didn't count because it was "actually four seperate khanates." I thought that was bull shit but whatever
Estimate from all known conflicts involving Britain and Ireland historically.
>50.000 British men dead and for what? what a waste.
Cromwell absolutely fucked Ireland for the rest of history. I think job well done.
Your own fault, you invaded a country filled with angry violent Celts, what did you expect would happen?
What historical changes led to feminism and the emancipation of women?
>inb4 the Jews
I'm not sure if I understand the question. The idea of women being treated equally to men existed since long before the first-wave feminism movement and I'm not sure if any historical event caused any sort of spark.
>>916618
>the idea of women being treated equally to men
I should probably reword this as
>the idea of women having equal rights to men
Has there ever been a man in history that had traits of a god?
i.e Unworldy strength, incredible feats, has done things that you personally think would qualify as inhuman?
>>916549
>the age of men is over
ITT: Your name is now your /his/ heritage
>>918248
>Faith Hooper
Kierkegaard? Meh.
>>918248
Lombard in 80% and Saracen in 20%
>>918248
lets go
>Everyone has to suffer because someone choose to eat the wrong apple
>Sometimes people are born with physical or mental defects not because of the wrong choices of their parents or ancestors, but because it fulfills the will of God
For what purpose?
God works in mysterious ways :)
Agnostic disbelieverfag here.
The way I've heard it explained is that God created man so that man could experience love - but you can only have love if there's free will involved. So when Adam and Eve chose to eat the apple, it wasn't god "predestining" it will happen, it was an act that Adam and Eve made for themselves because of the freedom granted to them afforded by God.
What was his problem?
His mother beat him too hard
The Bourgeoisie.
Probably narcissism, like most if not all dictators
Why is logical positivism frowned upon?
>>917448
because scientists are not good philosophers and philosophers are not good scientists
>>917448
On the contrary, it is praiseworthy.
>>917448
Because it dismissed the role of qualia in philosophy of mind. We all know qualia exists because we all experience it and can talk about it. Yet it's not observable and therefore logical positivism would dismiss it. That's how you end up with behaviorism/functuanalism/physicalism. Some epiphenomenalists will argue that qualia are just a shadow of the mind and have no causal role. Yet when you see your wife cheating you experience anger, a qualitative state, and may act on impulse.
>tl:dr
>logical positivism is bad because it dismisses the existent but unobservable phenomena
the first Fascist
the first girl scout
decorated combat veteran
criminally underrated and tactically removed from modern historic narrative
I bet she'd like to be choked during sex.
>>916207
quite the opposite
she was drugs and dom apperently
>>916207
nah she looks like someone into pegging
Are you an empiricist or a rationalist?
>>916195
im drunk
A mystic.
come at me bro
>>916195
Intuition is the basis.