Anonymous
The philisophical dead end of modern Gender Theory 2016-04-03 19:49:29 Post No.929442
[Report] Image search: [Google]
The philisophical dead end of modern Gender Theory 2016-04-03 19:49:29 Post No.929442
[Report] Image search: [Google]
The philisophical dead end of modern Gender Theory
Anonymous
2016-04-03 19:49:29
Post No. 929442
[Report]
[View this topic]
Is anyone else sickened by this shit? It used to be debatable but reasonable. Attraction was one of 4 things, M+F, F+F, M+M M/F+M+F, and gender was either M or F. Even trans people were still like that, they were M or F, it's just that they needed to resynch that because of a mind/body disconnect and the debate was over which reality was in the right, mind or body.
Now we have quadromantic ferrosexual polygendered demibois. What the hell does this even mean? I asked a friend of mine who, after being tainted by tumblr decided she wasn't just a bisexual girl, which is reasonable, but a "panromantic akiosexual cisgendered female with the she/her pronouns." which is nonsense. Especially since most of the people who call themselves "pan-" anything really aren't because they still have some level of hang ups and I know open relationships and incest are off the table for her. Plus apparently "akiosexual" means she can be attracted to someone sexually but not actually want sex. How? Sexual attraction is all about sex. Fucking hell man.
13 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
did their roleplay hurt your sensibilities
>>
>philosophy
>gender theory
>>
Who gives a shit?
File: autistic_waifu.webm (3MB, 640x640px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 640x640px
Has sex as an act always been as twisted as it is now? A lot of bdsm shit looks like it was inspired by medieval contraptions and im generally curious as to how human sex has gotten to the point it's at now. Surely there was something that pushed humans over the edge of having sex in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation.
28 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>925032
i was just curious aboout when french kissing was invented? human being always did it?
>>
>>925049
>he's never frenched a monkey
get out virgin
Anonymous
What did ancient people think about semen? 2016-04-03 17:16:08 Post No.928681
[Report] Image search: [Google]
What did ancient people think about semen? 2016-04-03 17:16:08 Post No.928681
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: sea-man.png (153KB, 252x288px) Image search:
[Google]
153KB, 252x288px
What did ancient people think about semen?
Anonymous
2016-04-03 17:16:08
Post No. 928681
[Report]
[View this topic]
Semen must've seemed pretty damn freaky to people 100+ years ago. You squirt a little bit of magic liquid up a girl's cooch, and bam, another human is manufactured. Very spoopy.
11 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>928681
Europeans thought it literally contained everything needed to make a child, and the woman just carried it
>>
>>928681
There's been a lot written about semen in historical medical and spiritual texts, there were all kinds of weird theories about it, like it being some magical life essence. So yeah, people did find it spoopy.
Also, the connection between insemination and pregnancy was rarely understood as straightforwadly as it is today.
>>
>>928681
Hebrews - like all fun stuff- are pretty anal about it.
>HURR YOU CANNOT, LIKE, PARTICIPATE IN BATTLE IF YOU HAD SEX THE NIGHT BEFORE
>ITS UNCLEAN AND YOU MUST DO RITUAL BATHING.
Also if you shot big loads, you were considered a degenerate.
Philosophy is a fucking joke. Enjoy your degree in Starbucks.
25 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
Jokes on you, I'm working at Starbucks after getting a real degree and studying philosophy to fill the void in my life
>>
>>928474
back to your formula sheets Ryan
>>
File: 1451774905134.png (86KB, 640x361px) Image search:
[Google]
86KB, 640x361px
>>928474
>he buys into the "the only life worth living is to be an efficient cog in the machine" meme
>he buys into the idea that the only thing of benefit to society is superficially increasing access to material goods
>he will go through his entirely life as slave to his baser emotions and desires, possibly going through lengthy and uninterrupted periods of depression and dissatisfaction, but will continue to ridicule legitimate methods of understanding the mind and personal agency because it's not supported by "empirical science"
File: IMG_6950.jpg (40KB, 229x231px) Image search:
[Google]
40KB, 229x231px
Do we all agree that there isn't an inherent meaning of life(other than to reproduce)?
47 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>928252
>other than to reproduce
[citation needed]
>>
>>928252
No, but I'm sure we all agree that our perceptions of life differ wildly. It's interesting to see what kind of reality the people around me create for themselves.
>>
File: confusing.png (48KB, 1024x960px) Image search:
[Google]
48KB, 1024x960px
Is "american intervention" just pseudo imperialism?
14 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>928021
Wow you figured it out! Want a cookie?
>>
not "pseudo"
it is imperialism in all but name
>>
>>928021
Good job anon. You finally figured it out.
File: 1456642438788.jpg (34KB, 992x744px) Image search:
[Google]
34KB, 992x744px
>he's a physicalist
>he's a Marxist
>he's a mind-body monist
>he's an eliminative materialist
>derridean *
>anarcho *
>he's a """"bright"""""
>he's a feminist
>he's a positivist
>he's a nihilist
>he's an apatheist
21 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1458421969476.png (257KB, 582x395px) Image search:
[Google]
257KB, 582x395px
>He's not a Christian
>>
File: 1458336799743.jpg (47KB, 621x502px) Image search:
[Google]
47KB, 621x502px
>>927967
>anarcho *
Honestly, most anarchists don't even take their ideology seriously. They subconsciously try to prove themselves right and deny opposing arguments in an attempt to keep their beliefs in check. That's why so many of them behave so radically.
t. Former Anarchist
>>
File: 1437217958579.jpg (85KB, 640x480px) Image search:
[Google]
85KB, 640x480px
>>927967
TFW none of the above
File: donald-trump_3.jpg (25KB, 500x327px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 500x327px
Why did the rulers exit the battlefield unscathed most of the times? Were they good fighters or was there more cavalry protecting them?
19 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>927822
because you can't control a battle effectively from the sharp end
As a leader at a high level, getting yourself killed is utterly fucking stupid. You need to keep yourself alive to conduct your plan.
>>
In periods where rulers often fought with their men, rulers died in battle relatively commonly (middle ages in particular), and in periods where rulers stayed back and issued commands, they were less likely to die.
They were usually good fighters but being a good fighter is not going let you survive a rout.
Anonymous
Convert me from deism to your religion 2016-04-03 12:29:36 Post No.927639
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Convert me from deism to your religion 2016-04-03 12:29:36 Post No.927639
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Thomas_Paine.jpg (1MB, 2400x3122px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2400x3122px
Convert me from deism to your religion
Anonymous
2016-04-03 12:29:36
Post No. 927639
[Report]
[View this topic]
Simple challenge theistic /his/torians convert me to your religion.
Inb4:
>"muh feels"
>"muh book tells me so"
>"muh objective moral values"
22 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
Why believe in deism when atheism is the null hypothesis?
>>
Roman Catholicism is the one true faith. That's not even debatable.
>>
>>927643
I'm just an optimist, I don't know if God exists, but I exert a bit of faith just because I think you should have faith in something, be it a philosophy or whatever.
File: quote-there-s-a-bible-on-that-shelf-there-but-i-keep-it-next-to-voltaire-poison-and-antidote-bertrand-russell-56-3-0315.jpg (55KB, 850x400px) Image search:
[Google]
55KB, 850x400px
What does he mean ?
15 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>927586
he means that he prefers to serve women in making them cum
>>
>>927586
He means he's retarded.
>>
>>927586
I had a feeling this was going to be a Voltaire meme thread... I love this meme desu
File: Fascism.jpg (42KB, 312x308px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 312x308px
Why do people say that the Nazis weren't fascist?
Nationalism Socialism is literally just fascism with racialists elements thrown in. All the characteristics of traditional fascism (absolute loyalty to the state, government headed by charismatic leader with undefined powers, focus on national struggle instead of class struggle, etc.) are all there, it's just that they also added the "Aryan supremacy" thing as well.
Seriously, to say that Nazism wasn't fascist would be like saying that pre-imperial Rome wasn't a republic because they would have temporary dictators step in. i.e. plainly false.
17 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Because its not Fascism, its Fascism with radicalism elements
Also Fascism isn't inherently racist like NatSoc is
>>
I think the general consensus is that Nazis were fascists I don't know many who would disagree. I mean that was kind of their thing.
>>
>>927146
Every time someone says the Nazis were Fascists you have some retard jump in with "NO FASCISM AND NAZISM ARE ACTUALLY TWO TOTALLY DISTINCT THINGS MUH NATIONAL SOCIALISM IS SO DIFFERENT"
when did christian angels get the cupid look? was there ever some kind of "heresy" deal about it?
23 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>926927
When they blatantly copied the greek and roman iconography
>>
>>926927
When Greco-Romans got into the act.
>>
>>926927
models are expensive
babies are cheapest models
Why was France always the vegeta to Britains goku?
16 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>926838
>casting Britain as the good guy
BEADY
>>
>>926846
I didn't mean like that. I meant France always had a similar power level but never quite as strong as britain
>>
>>926849
Well I don't know your stupid animu so I didn't know that
File: 250px-Benito_Mussolini_(primo_piano).jpg (14KB, 250x337px) Image search:
[Google]
14KB, 250x337px
Would it be better for Mussolini to stay neutral and not to go with Hitler? Was it possible from historical point of view? Italy wasn't that deeply cucked by Entente as Germany anyway. Why even war in the first place?
11 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>926674
>Why even war in the first place?
GLORY
GLORY
NEW ROMAN EMPIRE
>>
>>926674
Yeah. I did that in Hearts of Iron 3. I stayed neutral and just invaded Yugoslavia and Greece before they joined the Allies. Then let Germany lose to the Soviets.
>>
>Why even war in the first place?
Mussolini underestimated British resilience. He planned to stay neutrel, and then the Battle of France happened. He expected Germany to emerge as a European hegemon, and sought to enter the war both to ingratiate himself to the Germans, and to build strength against them.
Even up until 1941, the Italian's persued a notion of "parallel war", hence the Invasion of Greece.
He invisioned an axis victory looking something like the allied victory: Two co-beligerents carving out spheres to protect against the other.
The Italian military failed miserably though, and he ended up being a dependency of Germany, the exact situation he sought to avoid.
File: histomapwider.jpg (4MB, 2097x9554px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 2097x9554px
Let's get the aannoted bibliographies out of the way first: http://pastebin.com/u/jonstond2
Anybody got any cool stuff to dump? Do it here!
14 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
>>
>>926579
Yeah, I saw it earlier today
Feel free to dump the larger versions here, it'll bump it and get people interested
>>
>>926602
>just realised that it was pruned 4 days ago
Fugg my memory :---DDDDD
I remember the thread