>we must imagine Sisyphus to be happy
Whoever said that shit never worked manual labour. If it was true Mexicans should be the happiest people on earth.
Because Mexicans doing labour do it trying to reach a goal that fulfills their lives, while Sisyphus is conscious of the meaningless of his life.
>>908335
How is being conscious of the meaningless of your life supposed to make you happy?
I dont think you understood the book, at all
Actually you didnt even read it, did you anon?
Not one of these proofs, based on the philosophy of Aristotle, will be able to convince a non-believer of the existence of God. This is precisely why the Patristic theology of the Eastern Church in the first millennium (and after it, Orthodox theology in the second millenium)) refrained from making attempts to prove God's existence with the help of rational arguments and logic problems. As St. Maximus the Confessor maintains, God's being is perceived by faith, and this faith is "more worthy than any piece of evidence", inasmuch as it is true knowledge "exceeding both thought and reason".
Some Orthodox authors of more recent times have used rational proofs of God's existence borrowed from Western scholasticism, in academia or for apologetic purposes, though such proofs were alien and unnecessary for the ancient theological intuition of the Eastern Church. Rejecting them or refraining from them, Orthodox tradition is based on the idea that rational acknowledgement of God's existence is not at all identical to faith in God, for faith is an experiential knowledge of God, and such an encounter is generally impossible by way of rational knowledge. Religious experience transcends reason, and its expression demands another means aside from utilizing philosophic discourse.
Some Orthodox authors of more recent times have used rational proofs of God's existence borrowed from Western scholasticism, in academia or for apologetic purposes, though such proofs were alien and unnecessary for the ancient theological intuition of the Eastern Church. Rejecting them or refraining from them, Orthodox tradition is based on the idea that rational acknowledgement of God's existence is not at all identical to faith in God, for faith is an experiential knowledge of God, and such an encounter is generally impossible by way of rational knowledge. Religious experience transcends reason, and its expression demands another means aside from utilizing philosophic discourse.
In Orthodox tradition the very understanding of " theology" is least of all linked to rational thought, and theology is not perceived as a science, as an abstract theorization. The theologians of the ancient Church were not men who sat behind a desk surrounded by books, dictionaries, reference books and academic textbooks. The overwhelming majority of Church Fathers were bishops or monks: they either actively studied Church functions or worked in a Monastery. Their theology was born from an inner mystical, enriching experience, coming into contact with the Church tradition through the liturgical services, prayer, the reading of Scripture, and relationships with the people of God. The classical formulation of Evagrius of Pontus (Fourth century), says: If you are a theologian, then you will pray sincerely, and if you pray sincerely, then you are a theologian". In this definition the border between theology and knowledge of God, between theology and prayerful experience, fades away completely: theology is not what is other, but like an experience of a mystical encounter with God in prayer, it is an experience of a relationship with God.
Concerning theology as an experiential encounter with the Living God, V. N. Lossky writes in his Mystical Theology of the Eastern Churches:
God is not a scientific subject, and theology differs from philosophical thought in radical forms: a theologian does not seek God as one researches any other subject, but God himself takes possession of the theologian, just as another's personality can seize control of us. This is exactly why God first found the theologian, exactly why God went out to meet him in his revelation, so that it would seem possible to seek God as we all search for our own existence, and consequently for our mind, for any kind of presence. The God of theology-this "you", is the Living God of the Bible. Of course, this is the Absolute, but a personal Absolute, whom we call " you" in prayer.
>>908117
>Latin church attempts to be intelligent about it
>Orthodox church on the other hand actually praises and endorses stupidity
oh ok lol
Is there any argument that can be made to show that the allies were the "bad guys" in WW2? I try to be as open minded as possible, but it just doesn't seem justifiable to defend the nazis.
No.
the nazis dindu nuffin
they were both bad
Post your weaponfus
Kriegsmesser masterrace reporting in
Here's a beauty
Or a pole axe.
Shieet
This one generally seems to be an extremely overlooked aspect of french and european history. What i also find intriguing are the obvious parallels between the war in the Vendée and the american civil war: In both cases you had a rural conservative farmer's population rising up against their liberal-leaning/enlightenment-type central government trying to impose its will and values on said rural population, as well as the aspect of the latter being dramatically outmanned and outgunned in every single aspect by their adversary, but yet fighting on out of idealistic motives. Even the scorched earth retributional tactics were pretty much the same in both of these domestic conflicts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwZs1ihouDM
I don't really know enough about the specifics of the whole Vendée campaign in order to ascertain whether they actually had a realistic chance of thriumphing over the revolutionaries in Paris or not, but i find the thought experiment itself very interesting.
Would it be safe to say that, had they won the war in the Vendée, both liberalism/masonry and communism would have never been able to develop into fully-fledged political ideologies over the course of the 19th century?
I mean it's more than obvious that the french revolution itself was the "root cause" of these political doctrines so to speak. The soviets even still made flattering biopics about Napoleon and the french revolution even in the 1970's.
So what say you /his/? Did the Vendée rebels at any point have a realistic chance at some point of persisting against the central government, and how would history have played out if they actually did?
>>904972
>communism would have never been able to develop into fully-fledged political ideologies over the course of the 19th century?
That's a pretty big maybe. Disgruntled people like Marx would have arisen regardless, but the timeline might have been skewed. The effect in Russia, for example might well have been the same, due to the motivations of the revolutionaries.
>liberalism/masonry
Stop that silliness.
I'm just glad they were crushed as they were.
>In both cases you had a rural conservative farmer's population rising up against their liberal-leaning/enlightenment-type central government trying to impose its will and values on said rural population
I say this as a pretty big fan of the Jacobins;
There's a pretty big difference between rural peasants wanting to be left alone and wealthy slavers throwing a temper-tantrum about losing a democratic election fair and square, then proceeding to attack US government property, kickstart a massive war, and then whine for the next 150 years about MUH NORTHERN AGRESHUN and MUH STAETS RITES!
Give me a run down of Europe from 1450 to 1650, /his/.
and then it got better
>>904679
Spain beats France, France beats Spain.
>>904679
So these Ottoman guys were like "We would like Constantinople" and the Byzantines were like "no man it's ours", so then the Ottoman guys invaded and took the city over, and promptly renamed it Istanbul because it sounds better.
Blood on the tennis court edition
What's the point? Everyone has fucking terrible taste. There's always the same stale, emotionless, 19th century shit.
>>908143
BUT DUDE, THE SKILL. THE SKILL INVOLVED!!
Is there any way that the World Wars could have been prevented?
Hard-Mode: You aren't allowed to assassinate any of the Axis leadership.
War only propagated to the whole world through the alliance network. No alliances, no world wars.
>>907799
>Kill Karl Marx
>Kill Princip
That was easy.
Cut Germany's balls off after ww1.
Maintain a strong military to deter German stupidity.
Make German pay denbts.
Does the end justify the means? Please explain why.
depends on what the end is.
>>907619
So you are saying yes, essentially?
Yes, but you have to think about the second order effects of "bad" behavior. Turns out if the Prince backstabs his way to the crown, he creates a norm where backstabbing is normal and then he himself is killed.
What is the weirdest historical fact/story you know?
Oswald Mosley shot a shark with a revolver while Franklin D. Roosevelt watched
Germans and Brits had a Christmas party in the noman's land between trenches during WWII.
Just makes you realize how absurd wars are.
>>901858
*WWI
fuck
ITT god-tier cities
FILENAME DELENDA EST
Not the best by any measure, but imagine it.
Pre-snackbar Muslim cities, all mystical and Aladdin and shit.
CITY OF GOLD
What were ancestors doing in 1500?
I'm descended from poor farmers from the northern Indus Valley, so, dunno
Farming?
I come from WASPs.
My ancestors were busy being English noblemen.
Farming and fighting wars.
How did one nation fall so far?
moslems
>>906485
Mughal Empire?
>>906475
BUILD TOILET
Tell me about Maori /his/
>>905071
They literally ate an entire tribe of pacifists
It was like a /pol/ joke
>hello new friends, would you like to be equals?
RAAAAWWWRRR
OM NOM NOM
>>905071
Hard cunts who were hated by everyone else but were just too damn good to be killed off. They were also one of the few indigenous peoples to really mount a proper resistance to English colonization and they had a remarkable amount of success at it.
They get along with kiwis much better than abos do with 'strayans.
a people who existed as long as the white man but in 50000 years only managed to invent the pineapple
The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.
>>903626
The historian looks backward. In the end he also believes backward.
"It's blood all the way down"
>>903626
>mfw people unironically believe this