/script>
Is this really what having Schizophrenia is like?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNsT6vAhQ0k
There exist various forms of Schizophrenia.
>>1987907
>There exist various forms of Schizophrenia.
This.
And various forms of experiencing psychosis, which by the way doesn't have to be from schizophrenia, it can also happen with bipolar disorder. I have most likely the latter, and mostly experienced delusions, very few if any hallucinations.
>>1987886
No. I don't even have auditory hallucinations at all.
By far the worse part, at least for me, is the negative symptoms, just because the facial and verbal expression problems make getting on the good side of people very, very difficult. People treat you like garbage when you seem crazy. And there's no faking normal. That's the worst thing, the fear and stigma of others.
Also the negative symptoms make getting up and out and living life hard. I could deal with the positive symptoms just fine on my own. The visual hallucinations are a minor inconvenience. The "delusions" and "paranoia" are a matter of opinion, I feel. I don't think wealthy Western doctors with liberal worldviews have the necessary personal background or intellectual daring to be in a position to accurately gauge the problems with society or the dangers someone of a lower socioeconomic stratum such as myself might face.
>different people have different opinions
Wut
People with different opinions are sub-humans who should be strung up and hanged.
>>1987657
Not an argument.
Are there any other historical examples of leaders influencing fashion so much?
>>1987625
Qing China. Although there it was government mandate rather than a fashion branded on the public memory. Same deal for Best Korea
>>1987625
Victorians or the Chinese.
Chinese were pretty good at getting people to dress how their elite did. They even got the Mongol Empire to become Qinboos
Kennedy literally killed the fedora and all other male hats for that matter.
fraud? conceptual artist with intellectual merit? Which is it?
Should visual art be combined with conceptualism or is that question flawed logic?
>>1987164
it's action painting, very hardcore branch of expressionism
the whole idea is that you should pay attention to the act of painting itself rather than resulting work
>>1987164
He's good.
>>1987239
>hardcore branch of expressionism
that sounds like a meme dude
lets look at pollock in the context of his time. he scribbled a bunch of paint on a canvas, but somehow he was the first person to make a very lucrative career of it.
>Then now, I said, you will understand what our object was in selecting our soldiers, and educating them in music and gymnastic; we were contriving influences which would prepare them to take the dye of the laws in perfection, and the colour of their opinion about dangers and of every other opinion was to be indelibly fixed by their nurture and training, not to be washed away by such potent lyes as pleasure --mightier agent far in washing the soul than any soda or lye; or by sorrow, fear, and desire, the mightiest of all other solvents. And this sort of universal saving power of true opinion in conformity with law about real and false dangers I call and maintain to be courage, unless you disagree.
>But I agree, he replied; for I suppose that you mean to exclude mere uninstructed courage, such as that of a wild beast or of a slave --this, in your opinion, is not the courage which the law ordains, and ought to have another name.
>Most certainly.
>And therefore when any one of these pantomimic gentlemen, who are so clever that they can imitate anything, comes to us, and makes a proposal to exhibit himself and his poetry, we will fall down and worship him as a sweet and holy and wonderful being; but we must also inform him that in our State such as he are not permitted to exist; the law will not allow them.
>But shall our superintendence go no further, and are the poets only to be required by us to express the image of the good in their works, on pain, if they do anything else, of expulsion from our State? Or is the same control to be extended to other artists, and are they also to be prohibited from exhibiting the opposite forms of vice and intemperance and meanness and indecency in sculpture and building and the other creative arts; and is he who cannot conform to this rule of ours to be prevented from practising his art in our State, lest the taste of our citizens be corrupted by him?
>There can be no nobler training than that, he replied.
Was Plato fascist?
Why is this even a question?
>>1987127
Is this from The Republic?
>>1988578
Yes
Were 17th century theologians really as disgusted by the idea of being related to apes/monkeys as people make them out to be?
The name Chimpanzee comes from Bantzu "Ci-mpenzi," which roughly translates to "fake person"
The Latin name, Pan Troglodytes, comes from the word Troglodyte used in Greek myth to describe cave-dwelling humans living in East Africa
i ain't no monkey
fuck you, satanist
>>1986853
I'm not sure. Fun fact, the San realized that humans and primates are related before anyone else, and even made a myth as to why baboons and humans are different now.
Favorite obscure freedom fighters thread?
Nelson Mandela. Managed to almost bring down apartheid and lead an entire movement from within a jail cell. He then inconveniently died in that cell and Thabo Mbeki took all the credit
>>1986797
>obscure
>>1986797
kys role playing faggot
xdd mandela effect amirite guise?
These threads are stupid if you aren't going to post any info.
>>1986772
The leaders Rome deserved but not the ones it needed at the time.
>>1986772
Niggas didn't even make it out of Africa lmao
The first jet plane flew in 1939, so why was WW2 dominated by propeller planes?
>The first railgun was used in 2010, so why is the world dominated by ballistic weapons?
>>1986616
/thread
Because it takes a while to go from prototype to practical.
If she were alive today, do you think she would be a feminist?
Knowing who "she" is would help a bit
>>1986553
you should take this shitposting to /tv/, they would appreciate it more
>>1986553
Who?
If Hitler's authoritarianism and need for control are what caused his decision to invade Russia and the subsequent crushing loss, why doesn't the exact same apply to Joe Stalin?
Why didn't the Russians get punished for being run by a dictator but the Germans did?
>>1986527
I'm pretty sure Stalin punished the Russians far more than Hitler ever did to the Germans.
>>1986527
> Why didn't the Russians get punished for being run by a dictator
So 20mlns dead as a result of his actions isn't punishment enough?
Germany got "punished" because Germany lost. USSR won. There's nothing moral to this.
How can non populist leaders compete with a nationalist populist one?
why is populism seem as evil?
>>1986495
Because it appeals to humankind's base instincts as opposed to thoughtful reflection, which kinda runs against this whole "civilization" thing we've been doing for the last few thousand years
>>1986495
It gives seemingly simple solutions about complex problems and it doesnt get its approval due the sophistication and arguments of the politician but from the simple-mindness of the common people.
Populist know that the common people dont care about facts or long-term solutions. They want le manly men who just does his shit without caring about the subject.
Populist demand walls to be built to keep illegals out despite the wall being fucking expensive. And they demamd the country the illegals come from to build the wall despite it being the third largest trading partner. And they demand a wall at all despite the fact that about 75% of the illegals arent fucking stereotypical borderhoppers but people who just overstayed their work visa making the wall useless to begin with
>>1986495
democracy = populism
its the word elites use when they don't like opposing opinion
When will XIX-XX century meme about Slavs not being white end?
"white" is a concept made by slavs and paddies to try and trick the superior Anglo into believing they aren't subhuman.
>>1986228
How is inbred genetical rape-trash from the isles better?
People often joke that slavs never contributed anything, but that's wrong.
Unlike German inventions in which majority of them came from German Jews, Slavs actually contributed important things.
Why were suits so common in the late 19th and first half of the 20th century? They seemed to be worn all the time and by people of all cultures, was there a reason?
What would you think of a suit comeback
you made this thread with the same exact picture a month ago
>>1986167
There is nothing wrong with that
>>1986164
Clothing used to be extremely expensive, most people only had literally only one or two outfits, one for day to day life and the other one for Sunday church/special occasion, and that was that. Shoes also used to out of the reach for most poor people which is why up until even the 1950s poor children used to run around barefoot all day. They literally couldn't afford shoes.
Cheap, affordable clothing that meant that even working class first worlders could afford dozens of shirts, pants, shoes and so on only started appearing in the 1960s and 1970s. Prior to that only very rich had dozens of anything.
What has studying history taught you about humanity? Not necessarily what you think is objectively right, but what you've learned.
I have learned that we aren't as far from animals as we'd like to be. Our natural states and proclivities encourage things like rape, murder and banditry, and civilization is the conscious moving away from our natural state. But we're all a week of being without food to revert to our natural state, and we as a species have gone up and down on the scale of civilization, more pronounced in some regions than others.
I've also learned that power is best divested to local authorities, but quality of life improves the larger the net of trade is.
Also, historical sources have to be seen with the same skepticism and assumption of bias as modern media sources.
i learned people are mean as fuck
>>1986069
>studying history
>reading wiki articles and /pol/ macros
I mean all you have written there is what I "learned" when I first read Thomas Hobbes when I was 17. It's edgy as fuck but not true at all.
>Also, historical sources have to be seen with the same skepticism and assumption of bias as modern media sources.
Confirmed for not having the slightest clue about source criticism.
>>1986139
You haven't said what you believe.