Is Hinduism really the only non-LARPing polytheist religion in modern times /his/?
>>1988842
Shinto
>>1988842
>hinduism
>religion
colonialist pig pls
>>1988853
>non-LARPing
Discuss
>>1988665
Lurk more ahmed.
>>1988665
no, Lain is the one true God
>/his/ approved
>religion
50% of his are atheist according to the last poll I think(not sure), Christians were like 30%(?)
Technically, the only /his/ approved religions would be agnosticism(not really a religion)/full blown atheism or Catholicism/with a bit of Orthodoxy. Oh, and Zoroastrianism, since people love them Aryan religions.
Can we get a thread going for people who did literally nothing wrong? I'll start with the obvious.
>not instantly swapping over to the republicans out of sheer disgust
give up
>>1988466
Josef II Von Habsburg.
>>1988466
Didn't do anything right either.
>his dying mother asked him: "Joseph – who exactly are you now?" "Do you remember the tsar? Well, I'm like a tsar", replied Stalin. "You'd have done better to have become a priest" was his mother's retort.[8]
What did he mean by that?
>>1988313
>tfw your mommy is still disappointed in you even after you become the Man of Steel
Stalin actually cared a LOT about what his mother thought about him. His letters suggest some really sincere distress that she might feel neglected by him.
Did his mommy know about the NKVD and starvation and purges?
Existential comics.
>>1988023
>>1988024
where's the joke buckley
What religion do you see still being alive 500, 1000 or 2000 years from now and why?
>>1988021
>being alive
Define alive. Zoroastrism for example still has a couple 100k followers, although technically dead.
>>1988021
Islam. Everything else will be destroyed. Even human progress.
Islam will take over and we will be waiting until a comet wipes us out.
A waste of potential one might say but life, and with it intelligent human life is just a molecular coincidence. It is a consequence of random events that arose from the way things are and has no meaning.
>>1988021
Judaism
What percent of soldiers on the Eastern Front actually killed somebody?
What about the Western Front?
I don't think there are accurate statistics for what you are asking. The combined casualties on the eastern front were enormous
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)#Casualties
casualties on the western front were big. But not as big as in the Ost
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Front_(World_War_II)
Do some reading as well. Don't just use the encyclopedic Jew.
Less than combat deaths / total strength. Probably only a tiny fraction of that, actually, since most combat deaths would be from artillery, machine guns, etc.
So maybe... 1%?
Would it be fair to say that artillerymen probably killed someone, in many cases - several people?
Ok lads
How do we stop them?
Why stop what will eventually destroy itself?
>>1987862
>He wants to destroy the pillar of western society..
T. Eternal Anglo
>>1988469
t. George Soros
Why did he crown himself emperor?
>>1987525
Again ? We had this thread 12h ago
>>1987538
Nobody answered my question. It just derailed into the usual shitposting. I'm genuinely interested in a solid answer.
But /his/ probably does not even care about African history...
>>1987525
because black man likes bling bling
How could the Arab forces have won the 1967 war?
fighting it
Since the end of ww1 no arab nation has ever won a conventional war against a non arab nation.
>>1987467
iran-iraq?
Which American president killed most Americans?
Andrew Jackson
Lincoln
>>1987385
reservations were sovereign and most of the people he killed never gained citizenship so he didn't technically kill the most americans
Why were russians so shitty in WW1 that they couldn't beat shitty Austro-Hungarian troops and reserve German divisions?
>>1987162
the "Russia sucked in ww1" is a bit of a meme that people base almost entirely off Tannenberg, they nearly annihilated the entire Austro-Hungarian army, who needed constant fucking help from Germany
>getting BTFO by fucking Italy and Russia
Austria-hungary was a fucking embarrassment kek
>>1987252
Brusilovs offensive was the only notable achievement from them and it was against an A-H force. Every battle against the germans resulted in complete catastrophe
>>1987252
>be austria
>try and fight war on more fronts than Germany because of Germany
>need german help
>100 years later anons on history fourms shitpost about you
Is it envy God chose us instead of them to be his people? Envy of our wealth? Envy of our intelligence? Why have we been so irrationality persecuted throughout history?
>we
The beauty of the jewish woman must not perish from this earth.
Sup /his/,
So I work at a real estate firm in Toronto. In Ontario law there's a bill called the heritage act which gives power to the province or municipalities to designate buildings or property a "heritage site".
Example in Toronto most buildings built before the 1930s are considered heritage buildings, so they can't be torn down. Instead new development must incorporate elements of the facade of that building into the new structure
Pic is example of this being constructed right now. The white building embedded in the glass structure was actually completely disassembled, stored, then put back on the outside of the new building so the street front still has the old building's facade.
Anyway, one of our clients was saying how this is stupid and they should be able to buldoze any building on property they own and this adds unnecessary cost to incorporate the old facade into a new building.
The only argument I could come up with was vmuh heritage".
What's a more rational way I can defend the Heritage act and promote protecting old buildings in Toronto without just muh heritage?
>>1987011
This is that building before the glass structure was built
My god that looks hideous
at the very list split the damn buildings entirely
was Dr. Frankenstein the architect?
>>1987025
Here's another example
So is there some sort of smart theory behind it, or is it just literally "too deep for you"?
>>1986654
The religious like things that don't make sense. The more idiotic it is, the more "true" they are as believers for believing it.
>/rel/fag butthurt in 3,...2,...
not even a Christian, but the concept of distinct subsets within a superset shouldn't be terribly difficult to understand
>>1986654
3 hypostatis in an undivided ousia(essence)