I was reading about toroidal planets and how the right conditions could make it stable and liveable, and I was wondering if there were any other strange shapes for planets that could work and not just compress into a sphere over time (e.g. a pyramid planet)
>>8959981
mobius strip planet
KLEIN BOTTLE PLANET
>>8959981
Swastika shaped.
Its populations sheer hatred of space jews is what keeps it from collapsing
What field are you in, how many tattoo's do you have?
>>8959946
Programmer, mathematician. Zero because I am not retarded and my parents did not hate me, therefore I do not have to over compensate for a lack of personality and happiness in my life by begging for attention by drawing shit on my body.
>>8959946
>What field are you in
Literally a farmer, always in a field of some sort.
>how many tattoo's do you have?
None, I'm not a degenerate.
>>8959952
>Literally a farmer
Ayy farm bro, how did you stumble in this board?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUFlLBX9Bq0
Prove me wrong Protip: You can't
>>8959916
>Prove me wrong.
The Ascent of Man exists
it probably isn't the best documentary but the book is fantastic
Quick question.
Is it weird for a reviewer to submit his paper to the conference he is performing review on?
Obviously he does not review his own paper. But I still find it weird.
It's a circlejerk but it's not forbidden.
Well /sci/?
Has /x/ truly figured out faster than light travel?
/x/ is fucking retarded, so no.
>>8959857
When are you going to ask him how he ensures his mind is blank to keep the control pure?
And how he restricts his negative/positive brainwaves from interacting with various rice cups?
Also, faster than light is easy, just go at the speed of light, and then run from the back of the spaceship to the front.
>>8959986
It's even easier than that.
Consider a point. Now consider a point 1 light - year away from it . There, now we have travelled faster than light
What's /sci's opinion about this book?
Scientists and Engineers face a common problem. Which is any advancement is usually at least shared or taken by politicians/businesses.
This is something I have noticed which is a natural force by government and government entities to take credit for things.
If poverty decreases because of huge new innovations in farming, engineering, medicine, etc the credit goes to say the UN/government and not the technologies.
There is a huge lack of credit towards technological advancement through scientist or engineer work. Elon Musk is a good example of the way credit gets attributed. Employees are considered "lucky" to get to work for him instead of sharing credit by normies.
This is also common in say the curing of cancer. Where Biden is seen as a leader in the cure while doing nothing. That simply creating an awareness charity will probably get more credit than any scientist. See ALS ice bucket meme.
There is a huge misallocation of credit towards scientists and engineers. So much so in fact I feel if a singularity happens they should probably just eradicate all non scientists/engineers who advance humanity as part of such a singularity.
What do you think about this?
Example: Paris Accord will take credit for solar panel innovation when it is entirely because of the continued innovation and price decline per watt. Natural market forces will be paraded as "because of governments".
>>8959797
the scientists got their wage, so what's the problem here?
>>8959797
Scientists get plenty of credit. What the Paris Agreement rightly gets credit for is increasing funding for such research avid Fernando for renewable energy. Natural market forces will favor fossil fuels until they are more expensive than solar. Natural market forces do not fund basic scientific advancements.
>>8959797
>If poverty decreases because of huge new innovations in farming, engineering, medicine, etc the credit goes to say the UN/government and not the technologies.
Guess who funded those technologies, brainlet?
What's with this fucking meme going around that time doesn't exist. You can't just gerrymander the definition of the basic universal measure to explain, terribly, how you dont agree with it.
Time Exists.
>>8959775
Time is relative to the observer.
>>8959775
They mean it doesn't physically exist, which is kind of right.
Time is a logical construct that exists because we logically require it to.
For example, there is no "last week". It's not a destination you can go to; that's why time travel is impossible. You can't go to "next week" either. Time traveling forward OR backward isn't a thing because we only register time in relation to the present.
Even if you reversed entropy, you wouldn't have traveled in time because (causally) you would have the point in time where there was X entropy, the process of reversing it Y, and the point in time with identical Z entropy. But you would still know X existed before Z. Plus time dilation and relativity make time inconsistent universally.
Time is just the logical construct we have to describe causality. Even if the universe suffered heat death, and had virtually no motion and no information processing, time would not cease to exist.
it depends on the model. in relativity you have a four dimensional manifold that is the set of all possible events and it makes no distinction between time now, the future, or the past.
this is, however, a too strict model since we can identify the time passage intuitively (there's asymmetry between past and future) and that happens because of chaos and randomness in large scale systems. do they contradict each other? to an extent because relativity is not a theory of everything and doesn't take into account randomness but if everything was deterministic it would still be possible to both statistical arguments of passage of time and relativity to be right
Hey /sci/fags, help me: I need to the area closest to the vertex in these two function (image related) from 0 to pi/2.
r=50sin(theta)
r=-15sin(3theta)+35
the two lines intercept at each other at .4256 and pi\2 in the integral.
I have done the first section so really i just need
int{.4256}^{\pi/2} ((1/2)(-15sin(3\theta)+35)^2 d\theta
solved
But my calculator keeps shitting out numbers that are way too big, what am I doing wrong?
>equation in LaTex
>all my math is under the assumption that the area under polar curves is represented as pic
OP: Nvm, figured it out
Is this scientifically accurate?
>>8959717
Forgot to put the link
http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/
Explain this, /sci/.
If she has a condition where her body can't store fat, then how are her boobs do big?
>and reportedly has almost 0% body fat.
My guess is they are fake, to reduce bullying when growing up.
>>8959702
boobs are glands not fat ya virgin
>>8959716
She has fake tits.
Loma Linda is a well known medical school and they are a creationist school
Inventor of the MRI scanner is a creationist
what gives?
>>8959676
why are*
god I fucked
Is it better than GEB?
Well /sci/, what do you think about this problem?
Looks like something Patrick would write...
.. in his ice cream.
>>8959500
meaningless...
>>8959500
Whats so great about dumb old physics anyway
http://www.strawpoll.me/13123114
>>8959478
Terence Tao is a mathematician.
Edward Witten is a bullshitter "string theorist".
He doesn't even know what he is doing and the supreme autism Kontsevich humiliated him by proving his conjecture.
>>8959488
This.
Witten has what Ashkenazi girls crave. BJB (big Jewish brain)