Which is harder and why?
What do math majors even do besides teaching and "may I take your order please"ing?
I know it's a meme but I'm genuinely curious.
>>9033618
Physics is better it has more applications than pure math meme
math is probably the harder one for physics majors
physics is probably the harder one for math majors
>>9033623
>What do math majors even do besides teaching and "may I take your order please"ing?
two big ones are actuarial science and cryptography
daily reminder that the metric system is for lazy assholes who don't want to learn their multiplication tables
yep, just like circumcision is for lazy assholes (ameicans) who don't want to learn basic hygiene
>>9033612
I'M NOT A FUCKING YANKFAG.
also the american imperial system is not the actual imperial system fyi
>>9033609
Or maybe we don't want to waste our time with unit coefficients, as seen with basic force calculations; and stupid fraction measurements, as seen with the inch. When will you Americucks accept that the metric system is the more efficient, and therefore more intelligent option.
>>9032141
Sure thing sir, what have you got?
>I have given an extremely hand wavey description of neural function in the brain
>Therefore... consciousness is solved
>>9032141
what a pseud that guy is
Terrance Deacon is who actually knows whats up
Get in here peons.
say it, get it off your chest.
>Masters student at University of New Hampshire.
>Got my batchelor's at UNH too.
>Not in Ph.D. program elsewhere because rejected all around.
>silver lining appears
>got le epic research internship this summer elsewhere, I finally spread my wings
>get in
>PI gives me a book "Waves in Acoustic Media"
>fuck, this shit is meaningless
>almost seems to contradict itself in places
>me_no_understando.jpg
>the doc gives me vol 2
>vol 2 uses math I have never studied before
>I totally thought I could handle this
I don't feel like I'm experienced enough with syndrome to post in this group
>>9032116
cont.
>like how the fuck do you do research anyway?
>what have I got in store for myself in grad school?
>feel like such a brainlet
>for the love of god, send help
How would undergo the following chemical elimination of an ethylene group from a hydrocarbon?
See pic
that would be R- right?
>>9031941
We're removing the stuff attached to R to just get R remaining (R is generic hydrocarbon)
Simply use an hydrophobic molecule as a ligand to the hydrocarbon.I know ethylene is not water but its structure kinda close.
Why do all organisms more or less follow this rough facial geometry? Two eyes, one nose, and one mouth in more or less the exactly same place. Bears, chimps, rabbits, carnivorous and herbivorous, aquatic, lizard and mammal alike. Why not any other shape?
I WANNA FUCK THA FISH MOUTH
>>9031436
2 eyes = stereo vision and depth perception. Also for prey animals the eyes are often on the sides of the head, allowing for a wider FOV
Not all animal have noses in the same place, and many animals have no "nose" at all.
As for mouths, same as above.
>>9031436
maybe search symmetry in biology in wiki but maybe something to do with the idea of goal-direction, heading, so they have those evaluative senses toward the front parts of the animal (including things like hands and feelers). maybe nose, ears, mouth, eyes developed on head because its efficient i.e. close to the brain?
Hey /sci/, how likely is the chance that there's humanoid aliens beyond this Earth?
I discussed this with a bunch of friends while doing drugs, we agreed on 99 percent
>>9029527
Agree on what? Can you explain your reasoning?
>>9029524
Almost every alien I ever saw on star trek was humanoid therefore 100% yes Q.E.D.
infantile (cartoon) jokes edition
did you read any interesting problems, theorems, proofs, textbooks, or papers recently?
what is the most erotic math you have ever encountered?
what are you studying this summer?
Since none of the previous problems got solved I'm going to repost them:
1. >>9023709 (simple but tedious; linear algebra)
2. >>9023767 (simple but requires an advanced background; category theory)
3. >>9023781 (simple but there's a catch; arithmetic)
And adding two more to the list since the other anon who used to post problems seems to be MIA:
4. Let [math] 3 \leq p < n [/math] be natural numbers.
What is the maximum area of a [math]p[/math]-gon inscribed in a regular [math]n[/math]-gon (of a given area)? (harder than it reads, but tedious after you figure out the key aspects; analytic geometry)
5. Let [math] \mathcal{M} = \left\{ M \in {\mathbb{R}}^{n \times m} \mid MM^T = I_m \right\} [/math]. Prove that [math] \mathcal{M} [/math] is a manifold. What is its dimension? (simple but tedious; differential geometry)
Pick your poison! (Feel free to ask if you need any hints or clarifications on how to swallow it.)
>>9026508
>[math]\mathbb{R}[/math]
No such thing.
>>9026508
is the max area p-gon an (n-1)-gon where you connect two adjacent vertices of the regular n-gon?
Fusion when?
>>9025904
Probably not with that meme-machine you posted. The most surefire way is still ITER. But that shit takes fucking ages because a bajillion countries need to feel like they're contributing something.
If we get Fusion faster than that at all, it's probably because of projects like Tokamak Energy or what MIT has been planning for a while. Projects trying to build much smaller machines using recent tech superconductor tech that ITER didn't have available.
There is no guarantee that this will actually be a really workable solution, though.
Also even if they actually achieve enough net-energy-gain in a smaller machine than ITER, we'd still need a lot of research into the blanket and material technologies to make use of it. IE how to actually extract the energy from the reactor and how to reduce nuclear waste from activated reactor components.
What should I study so that I can work at a place like DEMO when they finally come online, /sci/?
ITER is planned to have finished construction around 2020 and will go online around 2024. If this works and becomes a viable power source, oil, gas and coal will be obsolete.
Can't wait for Muricas metaphorical jaw to drop when they realise that they can't get any money from oil anymore.
Why are there so few /sci/ence threads on this board?
Because of people like you
Because there has been huge spillage of /pol/ and /b/ on this board. Just look at the meta thread that's currently up. Half the people in the they legitimately want off-topic posts to be considered fine and normal for /sci/.
Also this thread is not science/math. Remember to politely sage
>>9035926
The "go back to /pol/" spammers are a worse problem than /pol/ crossposters
Will we ever develop a cure for autism?
>>9035019
That guy did not had autism. He simply had a prolonged case of lack of women.
See, let me explain you the cycle of men
>Man is born
>Man realizes how his penis works
>Man wants to put inside vagoo
Case 1:
>Man is attractive and can get vagoo
>Man get vagoo, become Chad
>Man never evolve and just stay as a typical Chad.
That isn't the case of Chris though, so lets go to case 2.
Case 2:
>Man is not attractive enough to get women
>Man has to get creative
>Man does something amusins. Perhaps learns an instrument, goes into a profitable career, starts a creative endeavor of other kind, etc.
Now there are two cases again
Case 2-1:
>Creative endeavor is popular
>Get bitches
>Put penis in vagoo
Again, this did not happen to Chris. So we must again go deeper
Case 2-2:
>Creative endeavor is a fucking piece of shit (sonichu)
>no women are attracted
>still no vagoo
>get fucking desperate
>nothing you do attracts vagoo
>You start becoming obsessed with women simply because you are now 30 and you have never seen one naked while you know back at your school there were 14 year old guys who got their dicks sucked by 5 girls
>start losing handle in reality
>become agressive
>this doesn't work
>No vagoo for your penis
>Realize your penis is useless, as it will never be inside a vagoo
>Become a vagoo
And that is where we are now. The fact that the motherfucker stresses so much that he wants to hang out with his "girl friends" just means that this is just a convoluted way of getting pussy, which won't work again and then we will see some real Elliot Rodgers shit.
>>9035049
You took way too much time to say "he's not autistic. He's just got a shitty attitude."
You might be autistic.
How do I stop being a brainlet guys? I'm exceptionally bad with numbers.
>>9034518
Study and work hard.
/thread
>>9034521
Is there any way to do this with minimal effort? I really hate doing math and don't want to put any real effort into not being retarded.
>>9034526
reroll irl.
hey /sci/
how do i deal with the fact that im a brainlet?
im unable to construct rational thoughts, im unable to grasp certain things. im an allround failure, is there anything left in life for me to do, without seeing always better and smarter people outclassing me? it is already too late for me to delude myself and become a gardener or something and be happy with it. ive already seen what not brainletism is and now i cant like myself anymore.
Start drinking
sign up for gibsmedats
>>9035139
Get a brain transplant
What is a brainlet?
>>9035085
Anyone with a sub 145 IQ
>>9035109
45*
Anyone with an IQ less than the person using the term.
Women need to be constantly validated and complimented on while men don't? Is there a scientific reasoning to this or is this only because society expects it to be this way? Is there a gene that determines whether someone needs validation?
Im sure there's some Darwinian explanation for why women devote more attention to their looks than men (makeup, clothes shopping, validation of looks etc.)
I would presume it has something to do with the makeup and expensive clothing being a norms for women (not sure why, somebody else can explain this), thus reflecting their poor self image and will to improve, which can often be validated by another mans attraction.
>>9035048
>Women need to be constantly validated and complimented on while men don't?
this is false. Men seek the attention of women, for the sake of attention, of believing to be worty by somebody else's eyes. Women do not need this.
>>9035105
Women had to attract men, not the other way around. Now that women are earning their own money, the men are trying to improve their looks more (Grooming, gym etc). Am I right about this?