ITT: most /lit/ dictators
Drumpf
>>9564698
> CHRUMPFFE
So...uh...we gonna make a litchan or what?
>making things
gay
>>9563968
/lit/ is too slow and empty to survive on its own
>>9563968
first post worst post
It seems that a lot of academia has a bad reputation here. Or maybe we only hear from the people who want to fume about what happened at school, but never any requisite praise. Putting aside economic utility for a moment, are there any universities worth going to for the sake of learning?
only if your doing STEM
>>9563626
>universities worth going to for the sake of learning
No.
Unless you require facilities and tech for certain STEM fields then there is no reason to go to university for the sake of learning, ever. You go for qualifications and building connections. At most unis provide learning guidelines, if you really want to know a field you'll need to do 90% of your study outside of required work.
Let me put my question differently: I'm in the military and have the G.I. Bill to look forward to once I get out. This means that I can get paid to go to most any undergraduate or graduate school for 36 months (9 months of classes in a standard academic year x 4 years). Would I be stupid not to expend my benefit, or are there better things I could be doing with my time assuming I don't opt for a career that I need a piece of paper for.
I need to perform a monologue for me theatre class. I'd like to do a monologue from either Crime and Punishment or Notes from Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky. Does anyone know of any good monologues from either of those?
you need to be at least 18 years old to post on this site
The 2x2 = 5 bit from Notes from Underground might be good, since the Underground Man is openly engaging in a one-sided dialogue with people, it's more comprehensible as a conversation than a lot of the book.
>>9563304
Senior in high school, just turned 18, etc.
Just got this
What am I in for?
PTSD
bananafish is the best one
a whole lot of boring shit t b h
I'm in the early stages of writing a book on Chris. I believe that Chris is extremely important to autism research and psychology in general because he's so well documented. With the large amount of information we have on him we can accurately analyse how people with autism think. Chris is also special because he is a stunning example of how not to raise an autistic child and how that effects development later in life. Chris' trolls are also very important because they set the stage for one of the longest going accidental social experiments I or anyone has seen. The trolling helps us understand how people with autism cope with harassment and death of loved ones (I'm referring to the Ivy saga). In the book I will be analysing Chris's childhood, his parents, the sagas, Sonichu, and how Chris interacts with other people to completely deconstruct his mental state. I will also try my best to figure out how his penis got bent at a 45 degree angle.
The book will be serious in tone because I'm going to submit it to a publisher once its near completion and they don't look to kindly on literature that makes fun of the mentally handicapped. I'm about half way through Sonichu but I suspect that Chris may finish issue 11 when I'm in the later stages of writing.
unoriginal idea. I've seen this idea on /tv/, /b/ and more over the years and have even literally had this conversation with normies irl.
You will be sued also.
Do you want us to think this is cool or something? Fucking pleb.
i've often read that /lit/ is a chris chan board
>>9562822
I'd read it, OP. I've been thinking of writing a book on Pastor Steven L. Anderson.
Is the KJV actually worth reading through in its entirety?
>>9562456
Not if you plan on reading it front to back on your own
>>9562456
For entertainment, yes. For scholarly study, no.
>>9562481
Which would you recommend then?
Does anyone else use psychedelics to enhance their writing skills? I've written all my published poems whilst on acid and the difference in quality between that and my sober writing is staggering.
i snort peyote before writing my homework
I think you could have three quarters of your brain removed and still successfully publish modern poetry. So what?
I think the post above me is splendidly right. So what?
>/lit/ acts all pretentious and superior, looking down on those who read genre fiction and YA novels
>check a writing critique thread
>it's all garbage
Huh.
>>9562070
>posts image about people not trying
>criticizes people for trying to improve
captcha: STOP
>>9562078
The picture is unrelated.
>>9562070
YA novels and most genre fiction deserve to be shat on. They are virtually nothing more than vapid and disposable time-wasters.
Who else here is tired of how politics inevitably shits on every beautiful and graceful thing this world has to offer?
>>9561791
I'm more tired of people injecting politics where it doesn't belong and injecting different ideas into politics.
Hmm. I've never noticed this before. I dread that fact that I finally did.
>>9561798
This.
>But anon, politics is everything.
Indirectly everything is connected to everything, kys obfuscator.
>book about countless billions being sent to a place of eternal torment, most of which never had any opportunity to be redeemed in the first place.
You'd have to by an unempathetic solipsistic douchebag to find this anything but the most depressing story imaginable. Even I Have No Mouth was more happy than this because by the end of that book only one person is tormented for eternity by a sadistic overlord.
Nobody is being sent to hell against their will. Hell is merely a term to describe the complete total absence of God, and because God is goodness itself it would be torturous to be completely separated from him. This is why depictions of involve lots of fire, because it would be painful. Anyways it is entirely your choice to be separated from God. God loves you so much that he won't force you to spend eternity with him if you don't want to. You can either be with God or not.
>>9561851
You don't think I've heard this apologetic before? Tell me what makes you so special? You think you're saved because you read a book. Yet you have more luxuries than the rich man in Luke. Have you forsaken everything, even your own kind in the pursuit of a devout life? Have you expunged all manner of sin? I'd be getting pretty worried about my salvation if I were you. On the say of Judgement you might just get a good 'ol "depart from me". All these Christians are self righteous that they are assured of their salvation but it would seem with all the conflicting doctrines somebody would have to be wrong. So why not you?
>its another "i havent read the bible, but heres why its wrong" episode
Why is modern literature so self-concerned?
Every second author is absolutely obsessed with their own identity.
Be that class identity, racial identity, gender identity or whichever new identity they've invented to find something to feel victimized over.
Why does literature no longer explore beyond ourselves? I haven't seen a new, promising novelist or poet in a long time who would rather write about morality, spirituality, nature or the supernatural (for example) than about how it is their god-given right to publicly drench their crotch in menstrual fluids for a few days every month.
Sad state of affairs.
>>9561257
>I haven't seen a new, promising novelist or poet in a long time
That's because instead of reading new authors you shit up /lit/ with poltardian bait threads, bucko.
>>9561257
Modern authors are just a bunch of wussies who can't explain themselves without putting labels. New American liberal movement trend does also adds fuel to the fire.
>>9561257
>morality, spirituality, nature or the supernatural
Because none of these exist in the modern mind.
Who do you think is the greatest stylist in the English language? And post an example!
I have to go with this guy.
"And that learning should take up too much time or leisure: I answer, the most active or busy man that hath been or can be, hath (no question) many vacant times of leisure while he expecteth the tides and returns of business (except he be either tedious and of no despatch, or lightly and unworthily ambitious to meddle in things that may be better done by others), and then the question is but how those spaces and times of leisure shall be filled and spent; whether in pleasure or in studies; as was well answered by Demosthenes to his adversary Æschines, that was a man given to pleasure, and told him “That his orations did smell of the lamp.” “Indeed,” said Demosthenes, “there is a great difference between the things that you and I do by lamp-light.” So as no man need doubt that learning will expel business, but rather it will keep and defend the possession of the mind against idleness and pleasure, which otherwise at unawares may enter to the prejudice of both."
He is endlessly engaging. One of the few authors I never get tired of.
>>9561194
>best stylist in the english language
Joyce. Is it really even a contest?
>>9561209
Heres a good excerpt. Not anywhere near his best, but it's all I could grab easily on my phone.
>A few light taps upon the pane made him turn to the window. It had begun to snow again. He watched sleepily the flakes, silver and dark, falling obliquely against the lamplight. The time had come for him to set out on his journey westward. Yes, the newspapers were right: snow was general all over Ireland. It was falling on every part of the dark central plain, on the treeless hills, falling softly upon the Bog of Allen and, farther westward, softly falling into the dark mutinous Shannon waves. It was falling, too, upon every part of the lonely churchyard on the hill where Michael Furey lay buried. It lay thickly drifted on the crooked crosses and headstones, on the spears of the little gate, on the barren thorns. His soul swooned slowly as he heard the snow falling faintly through the universe and faintly falling, like the descent of their last end, upon all the living and the dead.
>>9561194
>Style
>Prose
please stop. The answer is Bryon.
Enough pussyfooting, I'm ready to read. New Jerusalem or King James? Or maybe another translation? Why?
>>9560934
Always King James.
>>9560943
Why choose a bible based on a King's certain choice of proto-Elizabethan English instead of a scholarly text trying to be as accurate a translation as possible? Sounds like a loaded question but it isn't, I'm honestly asking
>>9560954
Personal choice really, The translation has wording that comes together rather beautifully, though others may not agree.
>reads Foucault once
>reads Foucault twice
>reads Agamben once
>reads Faulkner once