Why was Britain able to defeat the commies in Malaysia while France and The USA couldn't stop them in/ could only contain them in Vietnam or Cuba?
The communists in Malaya were a small identifiable racial minority.
The majority of citizens within the borders supported the communist insurgencies in Cuba & Vietnam, while Malaysian communists were a tiny minority.
>>2871147
>The communists in Malaya were a small identifiable racial minority.
... in a jungle. The Malay Crisis redefined the SAS and jungle warfare in-general. So much so that C Squadron, aka the Rhodies, based almost all of their operations during the Bush War off of their experience there.
The Malay Crisis is vastly misunderstood and overlooked conflict both in it's scope and in the methods used to suppress it. It was game-changing.
No redeeming qualities whatsoever.
The most dangerous kind of man, a stupid one.
Well he was a renowned fighter ace in WW1. Had 22 kills i think.
>>2871073
>The most dangerous kind of man, a stupid one.
Bullshit. Goering was intelligent and very sober by Nazi standards. He definitely stood apart from nuts like Himmler or Goebbels.
While he was obviously an antisemitism, I doubt that the Holocaust would happen with him at the helm.
Goering was fucking harmless you tard, he literally was all like "herpa derpa I can win the Battle of Britain" lost and then ran off to a castle, ate sweets, watched movies and played dress up
Why the fuck are there african-muslims when most arabs treat them like shit and think of them in the same manner as animal's?
>>2870964
Same reason there is African christians
>>2870967
Nice strawman faggot. Christians also ended slavery and gave blacks equal rights and even insane things like interracial marriage.
Islam never had movements centering around even abolishing slavery.
Africa has a rich history with Islam. I know we've been brainwashed into thinking all forms of cultural diffusion, inequality and imperialism is bad but in fact Africa benefited from Islam in a social, spiritual, economic and cultural sense.
>Reading about the exploration and conquest of America
> This explorer was planning to do this but her native lover proposed him a new plan
>The natives were planning and ambush but the native lover warned the explorer about it
>This explorer was going to take this path but her native lover warned him about the dangers
Why did native women hate natives and allied with the Spanish as soon as they appeared? I am reading the Spanish empire by Hugh Thomas and it seems that without the help of the native women the Spaniards would have had a way harder time exploring and conquering the continent
>>2870882
>Hmm...This sexy hunk of European manmeat wants to go beat people up for glory and riches...
>I know! How about I help him beat up other tribes! That'll show those [group x], who my people have been at war with for literally hundreds of years!
>>2870882
they probably looked like gods to them
if god wants your head you give him your head
that's how they reasoned
>>2870890
But for example Nuñez de Balboa was about to get murdered but the chief's daughter (her lover) told him about his plans and with the information the Spaniards managed to beat them.Native girls were betraying their own fathers and brothers in some cases.
Why is ok to see the Rising Sun flag around places and even on some merchandise/souvenir shops but the Swastika?
people are uneducated on japanese atrocities
In Asia it's no problem to show the swastika.
In Europe there is no problem to show the rising sun flag.
In Asia there is a problem showing the rising sun flag.
In Europe there is a problem showing the swastika.
>>2870655
reverse in asia, sucka
Let us say, we are in middle ages. I am the leader of four bandits and we try ambushing a caravan since I do know that they only have two people.
What is the best strategy to use? Assume that the caravan has two horses and both guys are good fighters who can pubstomp me and my bandits one-on-one. I am free to use any weapon, as long as it is not something like King Arthur's Excalibur, the two only can use short swords.
- One crossbow to shoot the horses, brute force afterwards.
- Two crossbows and the other three try to buy time.
- ?
>>2870640
Most people were unarmed so it'd be like taking land from a Polack
>>2870640
Just set up a light machine gun along the path they're taking. Failing that, use grenades.
>>2870640
don't shoot the horses, those things are expensive and you'll need them for carrying away loot.
The best thing you can do is shoot one of the two while they aren't paying attention with a crossbow, preferably twice. The rest of you should have crossbows at ready, and spears for everyone.
What kind of armor are the two guys wearing? If they are in full plate, you're kinda fucked. If they are just in chainmail or gambesons, your crossbows will do well
What does this pose signify?
It means he is a fatass.
Come at me bruv
Sui Dynasty, I'm Tang.
Was Yang Wenli wrong to throw his life away for demcracy? Is human society doomes to an endless ebb and flow of freedom and authoritarian control? Shitposting aside is there really any form of government more conducive to a free and prosperous society than the liberal democratic republics of the modern age? I've been spending a lot of time studying government and brainstorming various legislative reforms for the US and despite the flaws i cant conceive of any philosophy of government better than liberal republicanism. Am i hopelessly biased or is the democratic republic the real red pill?
>Yang is my hero
>>2870358
Constitutional Monarchy is probably best, on average, but a strong monarchy with a good ruler is the best form of government possible. The issue is getting a good ruler.
HAIL KAISER REINHARD
>>2870358
Your first and primary mistake is believing that democracy is the same thing as liberty. The United States in its earlier forms was much more free then it is today, and yet it had extremely limited suffrage and only the House was directly elected by the people. The Senate was chosen by State Legislatures, the Supreme Court was appointed, and the States did [and still do] elect the President. And that 'democratic' government was [and to a lesser degree still is] extremely limited by codified institutions.
If anything democracy is a hindrance to liberty, especially if you have universal suffrage. Also all glory to Kaiser Reinhard.
>>2870376
But wouldnt you say that representation in the state or institution which wields authority over an individual is a basic human right of said individual? Though it can be undeniably effective with a ruler of the calibre of Frederick the Great, in any monarchy for each Frederick there arises a dozen Commodus'. On top of that if the monarch does not wield ultimate authority over any parliamentary body that may exist to represent the popular will, then the momarch is but a figure head and the atrophy of the office will eventually become a destabilizing force in the state at large. Once again the issues inherent in centralizing authority to such a degree begin to appear...
DIE KAISER
were the founders of China white?
>>2870175
WE WUZ
WE WUZNT
>>2870175
WE WUZ QINZ
Explain why video games aren't the supreme art form.
Humanities was a mistake.
requires interactivity
you can "read" a book by just flipping pages and not comprehending anything
you can "watch" a movie by leaving it in the background while you're on your phone
you can only play a game by overcoming the challenges it presents you. a good game will constantly challenge you and therefore you will pay close attention to the plot and the themes will transfer to you
the exception to this is the video games that border on the cinematic like metal gear solid. in contrast, a game like ocarina of time doesn't have a cutscene longer than half a minute, so all plot advancement is predicated on user engagement
something i love about video games
>>2870129
That image is pure reductionism
But ayway, I think the reason video games aren't taken seriously is because of the huge time investment they require. "Cultured" art is perceived to somehow improve the person consuming it and really activate their almonds. Video games, on the other hand, require far too much of the consumer's time and in the end they don't usually offer any more insight into life than movies or books.
Plus, video games are a huge collaborative effort and don't usually have the benefit of a singular vision like a book would. Even a movie is a more focused than a video game
That said, I still think video games are the most interesting development in the arts in a long time.
Instead of joining the EU and NATO the former Warsaw Pact (minus the CIS) nations could have joined the non-aligned movement and fostered national sovereignty. What went wrong?
>>2869948
Why would they? Russia fucked them while they were in there, why would they go back to that shithole?
>>2869994
>warsaw pact nations
>in non-aligned movement
Anon, I...
non-aligned movement was a collection of third world left-wing dictatorships. Really not a group you want to be part of.
>Reading Greek history
>Reading Byzantine history
>>2869703
>reading Roman history
>>2869703
>reading Greek philosophy
Is he right?
>>2868378
Daily reminder that Heisenberg most likely never said that.
>>2868388
Phew, for a minute there I was actually going to engage with the thoughts/problems raised with OP's question.
But thank God you were here to post anime.
>>2868388
Do you mean to contest the integrity of truthcontest.com?
2000 years later and I am still salty.
>>2868366
>Huns
>2000 years ago.
Might I presume you graduated from an American institute of higher education?
>>2868376
Not OP but, the Western Empire was controlled mostly by Germanic peoples.
How does one combat African-Americans LARPing as Egyptians?
>>2867889
Blacks, on average, are too stupid to reason with. inb4 "I know one black guy with a triple digit IQ"
>>2867898
Stupid people are dangerous.
Egyptians do not look black, my afro-american friend
>But surely modern Egyptians and ancient Egyptians are different
Only very slightly, genetic research shows that they are mostly the same people
>Even after all these years?
Yes, ancient Egypt had a population approaching 10 million, and invasions would never be more than a few thousand soldiers at a time, who would mostly move on to other places after their conquest was complete. That's nowhere near enough to have a dent in their population. For a comparative example, look at Ireland. Ireland has undergone numerous invasions, and settlements, with the most significant being 1/5th of their total population, and yet 88% of Irish people have little to no non-Irish admixture.
>But modern Egypt's language and religion is completely different!
Culture and religion can change very readily, especially if the ruling class is replaced
>At last I truly see
See, that wasn't hard