>Autocratic leader trying to consolidate power
>Establishes a more modern and well trained army
>The old elite military force has a long and honorable history but has become corrupt and unreliable
>Leader manipulates the elite force to rebel
>Burns down their headquarters
>Issues orders for governors across the empire to hunt them down
Was this the Ottoman Order 66?
>>3152797
idk man its just how it goes. A powerful faction for centuries will become entrenched in the fabric of the society. I think the Jannisarys were controlling the court and various successions at times? I mean ffs Egypt was called the Malalukes for a bit which was a military faction exactly like the Janissarys at one point
>>3152797
Pretty much order 66 exactly.
However there's a couple things.
For one, the Janissary uprising was primarily put down by Sipahis. The western-style army the Sultan wanted was only in it's planning phase. Indeed, it's the existance of the plan that caused the Janissaries to rebel. Sipahis and Janissaries hated each other for centuries, with the Janissaries drawing power from their dominance of the court, and Sipahis from being traditional landed aristocracy.
Mahmud II simply used the existing rivalry and the power of the Sipahis to end the Janissaries for good. Then he also abolished the Sipahi system as well in favor of western-style professional cavalry. However, the Sipahis didn't chimp out; the older Sipahis retired to their land while the younger joined the new Cavalry corp as officers.
So in Star Wars terms, it would be as if the Sith was an opposite and equal to the Jedi, and themselves openly playing a key role in Republic Institutions.
Could a kind /his/torian give me a quick rundown on the key players, factions, and chain of events?
Why is Buddhism such a life denying and pessimistic ideology? It's basic premise is pretty sound, but instead of actually suggesting how to live a good or moral life is suggests simply giving up on life and detaching from the world. It's like the official religion of bitter quitters.
>but instead of actually suggesting how to live a good or moral life
It does though through rules, ideals and sayings of Buddha.
I will admit that the supernatural Buddhism has a much stronger case than the secular Buddhism that denies rebirth though.
>>3152770
What about the basic premise is sound? What's your solution?
>>3152770
Buddhism is Gnostic BS. I was raised by hippy parents who practiced it, I feel depressed, empty and nihilistic much of the time. Too many contradictions in its dogma too, like "life is suffering, so show compassion for all other living beings" while simultaneously treating all life as worthless because everything dies and reincarnates anyway. Why should i show compassion when all life is worthless? That doesnt make sense and makes me think the contradiction is there on purpose ie its a mind control trick.
Do you think that if the library of Alexandria were not burned, we would be very advanced in knowledge?
>>3152749
Really?????
Fuck no
>>3152672
>>3152672
Et tu Brute?
>>3152672
Anime becoming shit in about 2014 is pretty up there
Is violence an inherent aspect of being human?
>>3152667
NO; IT IS AN INHERENT ASPECT OF LIFE WITHIN THE KOSMOS.
>>3152667
No it is an action that can be performed by humans. I dont know if it is an "inherent aspect" of being human, would you characterize other free-will actions performed by individuals as an "inherent aspect of being human"?
>>3152667
It's an inherent aspect of being human in a capitalist society
Been away for a while. Who is Max and what is he about?
>>3152611
There needs to be more Max Stirner memes
>>3152661
if you've got them post them
A lot of people around me have been dying as of late and I have consequently learned what a lot of people around me think about what happens after you die. I haven't encountered anyone personally as of yet that beleives you are painfully erased from existence like my materialist online friends believe, or simply surrendered to the void like pick related claimed.
>>3152586
>Do you beleive [SIC] in an afterlife?
IF BY "AFTERLIFE" YOU MEAN IN CONTINUATION OF LIFE BEYOND THE KOSMOS, YES, I DO.
>... simply surrendered to the void like pick [SIC] related [ALBERT EINSTEIN] claimed.
ALBERT EINSTEIN WAS A JEW, A MATERIALIST, AND AN AGENT OF CHAOS; OBVIOUSLY, HE WOULD HAVE BELIEVED, OR CLAIMED TO BELIEVE, THAT AFTER PHYSICAL DEATH THERE IS ONLY THE VOID.
>>3152619
>IF BY "AFTERLIFE" YOU MEAN CONTINUATION...
>>3152586
i believe in the reincarnation of the human.
so as you die and your soul leaves your body, it instantaneously goes to another new born baby.
/his/ ylyl
>>3152545
Well they weren't using it.
>>3152545
>tfw your brother goes on vacation to murder Saracens for fun leaving you to run the country in his stead and the people hate you because you try to fix the budget deficit and side with a terrorist archer against you and then your brother gets kidnapped by the French and has be saved by his mother but the people still love your brother more than you and you go down in history as England's worst king while the manchild who left his country to rot goes down in history as the greatest and the terrorist who supported him becomes a folk hero
>>3152477
England's greatest King is Alfred though, and it's not even close.
>>3152487
this, who the fuck thinks richard is england's greatest king
>>3152477
england has only ever had one king called "great" and that's >>3152487
richard I was the one to persecute robin hood btw, also he died like a cuck.
he's remembered because he at least tried to crusade.
john is only hated because he signed the (((magna carta)))
edward I was everything richard I was but better, yet he's constantly slandered.
Is he right, /his/?
>>3152462
Absolutely. I don't see how this can be denied.
Yes, but coming from Kim Il-Sung it is like telling someone they need to take a shower then pissing on them.
>>3152472
Nonsense. The Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung, liberator of Korea believed that only armed struggle against imperialism is the only way to achieve independence. Kim Il Sung single-handedly defeated the Japanese imperialists and liberated Korea not by drinking tea and having biscuits but leading the revolutionary army against the Japanese imperialists.
It was also thanks to armed struggle that President Kim Il Sung defeated the U.S. imperialists in the Great Fatherland Liberation Army thus bringing end of the myth of "American supremacy".
Why have outlaws, thieves, pirates, etc had such a large impact on popular culture? What exactly does the average person see in a masked bandit, or something like Robin Hood? Is it all romanticism? Is the antihero trope inherently one that belongs to folk tales?
>>3152431
They are many examples of chaotic characters who become popular for standing against authoritarianism and tyranny.
They often appeared as heroes in the eyes of poor and oppressed.
It is easier for most people to empathize with rogues and scoundrels than rulers or kings
He was great
overrated boy-fucking pansy.
>tfw frederick fled three times in the same battle against the austrians during the seven years war
>>3152428
Frederick II was not that great, though he thought of himself as such.
If the SA had held onto power and Strasserist Nazism had emerged, would WW2 have still happened?
>>3152427
I dont think strasser had the same warmongering ideals that Hitler did, but I do think the war would have happened anyway from eventual aggression from Stalin.
>>3152440
>ADOLF HITLER.
>WARMONGER.
?
>>3152427
Yes. The British Empire has had to destroy Germany as an economic and imperial competitor since the late 19th century.
What the fuck was up with the 1980s? Was it the peak of commercialism?
>>3152370
Consumer spending got a new, huge breath of life after the economic and social malaise of the 70s.
Before the 70s, it seemed like everything in America could work out forever. We were the top dog, we had an enemy to hate, we were getting richer and richer.
Then the 70s hit, the Hippies were finished, Nixon fucked around, the oil shock hit, Americans who had spent a lifetime in a great economy suddenly realized they'd have to tighten their belts, and America's greed caught up with it. They chose not to tighten their belts. They instead elected Ron Reagan in 1980.
Instead of becoming fiscally responsible, Reagan reduced tax rates and threw money everywhere in hopes of stimulating the economy. Fed interest rates soared. He cut the fat/slashed discretionary programs while increasing the defense budget and declining to reform health care spending (America's largest set of entitlement programs by far). But the economy was better than Carter, and that's what America wanted and had asked for.
As for commercialism, it became more refined, but it had already begun decades earlier. It's just that those with creative influence (writers, filmmakers, journalists) saw in their moment a time of intense commercialism that appeared to be killing culture, whereas before it was understood that the commercial was almost universally beneficial with a few bad eggs, rather than universally dangerous with a few good eggs.
>>3152421
>saw in their moment a time of intense commercialism that appeared to be killing culture, whereas before it was understood that the commercial was almost universally beneficial with a few bad eggs, rather than universally dangerous with a few good eggs.
this is what They Live is all about
This is not a knock on them. I'm just thinking if you were awkward, introverted, and not really good with people you'd probably join the Church right?
>Celibate, wears the same thing every day
>Spend each day doing repetitive, detail-oriented work
>Recite obscure Biblical facts from memory
>>3152350
Strict NoFap
>>3152350
I don't know how that would supersede field work
There's no life like the monk life.