Was it really true that the Brits only good at fighting Aboriginals and spear chuckers ?
>>2836460
>Italy
>Roman Empire
That's a bit of a stretch.
TRIGGERED BRITFAGS INCOMING
>>2836464
Italy was never a great power, so OP probably shouldn't have even included it. Plus you could say that the area Germany conquered in WWII was technically also conquered by Italy.
>>2836460
Never looked at it this way before.
What are the top 10 best Anglo backstabs?
>>2836444
1776. However, it was a completely justified backstab. Fuck the British. Most detestable people on Earth, and I say that as a person with mostly British blood.
>>2836448
fuck off you yank
>>2836453
Nah. ;^) We're top dog now, bitch.
http://nationalunitygovernment.org/content/first-race-out-australia-not-africa-
This article states that humans began in Aboland 400,000 years ago not in East Africa 200,000 years ago.
This explains a hole in human evolution where Australoid humans look and behave more primitive than African niggers despite african niggers being evolutionarily older than them, this means that its the other way around explaining that hole.
I've never encountered an aboriginal. They don't look that bad. I don't know why this website seems to dislike them so much. Based on google images, they look like black cowboys.
The Sentinelese man is a human that looks like a nigger yet behaves more feral than african ones, it could be evidence that the ancestors of negros used to lived in tropical India before migrating south into Africa.
So proto-niggers were once the natives of India, aint that just intriguing?
>>2836198
Back to /pol/ you piece of shit.
Does anyone here have a real, inherited coat of arms recognised by a legitimate heraldic authority?
Please don't post about your family arms from some scam shop.
>>2836160
I'm Scottish, and my last name is Gordon, so I'm assuming this applies
(clan Gordon)
>>2836160
>Does anyone here have a real, inherited coat of arms
No, because coats of arms aren't inherited.
Say what you will about Marxist-Leninism but they had great taste in flags.
>>2835967
>generic tricolours with ugly colour schemes and a hammer an sickle or retardedly overdesigned coat of arms tacked on
>great taste
Fuck off commieboo
>>2835967
>Commies
>having better flags than liberal republicans
Simple and without stupid shields
There flags look like if you disobey them they kill your family
Is this the definitive edition of the New Testament?
>>2834822
Yeah brah.
/tred
>look up this translation
holy shit im dying
>>2834822
>God look eryting he wen make, an he say, “Real, real good, all dat!”
Yes
Will there be anything left for humans once A.I. is created? By that I mean creative work, since scientists are now insisting that robots are going to be able to write music and literature better than any human.
So, assuming that's true, what are we going to do? Or do you think that robots, whether they have A.I. or not, are going to stick to practical tasks?
Well I dunno about you, but the way I see things is that biological intelligences are the universe's stepping stone to artificial ones. robots made of silica and metal are supposed to explore the cosmos not us biodegradable meat cucks.
Baseline humans will will basically be zoo animals, eventually.
>>2834559
>since scientists are now insisting that robots are going to be able to write music and literature better than any human.
Is this what STEMfags actually believe?
Gimme propaganda, photoshoped pics manipulating history
Bright, shiny ambulance was just, luckily available for this pic.
No comments needed on this one
>God is an asshole for allowing evil to exist, he should intervene!
>Ok, says God
>*Wipes out the evil canaanites*
>WHY DID HE DO THAT
What do these people want?
Another flood
>why yes i believe in god
>>2834005
nah, god is an asshole for
>testing humans on an unequal base
>does not take circumstances into consideration
Evil people born into a perfect environment never commiting the atrocities they would've done when living under stress, and good people murdering and stealing because they refuse to choose a miserable death.
even if those cases are extraordinary and rare, they still exist.
And if circumstances are going into consideration for god to choose who can go to heaven, then he must understand that without creating UNMISTAKABLE proof or an environment that allows complete reconstruction of his scripture through going by prove even in case it is lost, there are people who can not truly believe that the bible is supposed to speak the truth
>mfw the Ottoman Empire was real
Feels good
>get wrecked by European Powers in 20th centry
>never really recovered
feels good
I unironically hate every Turk alive
they are the most genocidal, barbaric, low-iq, scum of the Earth
>>2833642
You know what I don't understand?
Why the FUCK were the Ottomans given SO MUCH at the end of WWI?
The Turks have a long history of genociding other cultures (see: Assyrian, Greek, Armenian genocides). Even so, there was a sizable Greek population in Western Anatolia near the end of WWI. The Ottomans tried to genocide them...
So my question is: Why weren't the Allies more punitive/aggressive against the Ottomans after WWI? Why not give Thrace/Smyrna/Nikaea/Constantinople (western Anatolia) BACK to the Greeks?
This seems like one of the major errors in world history, in my view. Such a decision may have caused Turkey to insert themselves into WWII... but wouldn't that part of the world be a better, safer place if Western Anatolia were under Greek control?
In retrospect... the Ottomans got away with a lot re: Sykes-Picot... and the heirs of the Ottoman Empire (the Turks) continue to get away with horrible things (see: Kurd relations).
So what the heck happened here? Why did this fall apart? Would everything be different had Greece joined the Allies? Why weren't the Greeks capable of stopping the Turkish Independence when everything was in their favor?
>>2833649
>low iq
>takes over the balkans for hundreds of years and creates monopoly on spices and silks
Europoors make me sick
Why's the obsession with this man?
>>2832264
he was actually a trap
Power fantasies for lonely neckbeards
>>2832264
He's literally Hitler.
Do you think it is possible /his/?
As an American, racial issues are among the most controversial topics in our culture and there seems to be a strong push in the mainstream to reach some kind of "solution" to the problems that exist between the races. In particular the tensions between Whites and Blacks tend to dominate any discussion of race in America which is interesting because Latinos are actually our largest minority but because Blacks tend to get more attention because of slavery.
Personally, I'm skeptical of the idea that the different races will live harmoniously and that rather than searching for a "solution" the best course of action is to find the best way to live with the problem. My skepticism originates from the fact that regardless of one's personal feelings about their racial identity or lack thereof, they will inevitably be categorized by others on the basis of their race and this categorization brings with it all the baggage of history. Modern progressive Whites are attempting to "correct" this baggage by engaging in and promoting public ethno-masochism with the hope that it will eventually counteract the legacy of imperialism. This seems misguided because as far as I can tell most Blacks are not impressed by their penitential demonstrations and instead view their shame as something to be exploited. The fact is there exists a very profitable race-baiting industry in the US and you can see it in the popularity of the type of media that gets promoted. I don't see how any sort of healing can take place when there is always someone willing rip open old wounds to make a quick buck.
To me it seems that the only way true reconciliation is possible is through a shared spirituality. An identity grounded first and foremost in one's relationship with God creates the opportunity to lay aside racial grievances since they are ultimately temporal and worldly things that are transcended by the Divine.
Thoughts?
Diversity + proximity = conflict.
Diversity + separation = peace.
It's simple.
>>2832011
But who gets the best land?
Racial tensions are kind of a meme. Seems like everyone is kind of content just keeping everyone else at arm's length. I don't think racial tensions will really come at a boiling point in any meaningful way all else being equal.
What wins Wars?
That's pretty luxurious by mass grave standards. Look at all of that unused real estate.
>>2831755
>What wins Wars?
Logistics
>>2831755
Imposing your political will on the enemy.
How come Latin names sound so cool and masculine?
Titus, Cornellius, Maximus, Marcus, Julius, Antonius......
>>2831595
Because your Saturday Morning Cartoons adopted the naming scheme.
They sound autistic to me.
>>2831595
>How come Latin names sound like old black men living in Harlem?
Can we have a thread about Islam that isn't political in any way?
I just noticed the Teaching Company released a course about Islamic achievements and inventions. Seems highly rated too. Anyone give it a shot? Book recommendations in general are also welcome.
So, correct me if I am wrong, but at some point the Muslim Caliphates ended. Like there were still Empires and such, but no accepted religious head.
Did this prevent Islam from having a reformist movement? It's simplifying a lot to compare the Pope to the caliph, but a lot of the zeal behind protestantism was disillusionment with the papacy. This makes me think that, because there was no one to blame for religious problems like there was with Christianity, an organic reform movement could never arise.
>>2830704
Islam's reformist energies simply had very little to do with politics until the 20th century, because after about the 10th century Islam began to retreat from politics altogether. Comparisons with Christian Reformation don't get very far because of how politics was at the center of the Protestant-Catholic divide, and while much is made of the politics behind the founding of the Sunni-Shia divide it was for the most part fought in judiciary and mystic fields, along with most every divisive issue among Medieval and Early Modern Muslims.
>>2830739
Why would the religious leaders retreat from politics when previously they had been the Supreme Political leaders?
Seperately, why is Islam so fused with politics today?