can I tell if my growth plates are closed from a jaw x-ray? pic related isn't mine I'm getting an x-ray in couple hours
you will always be a manlet
>>8993678
it's over, you'll never grow a larger set of shoulders or a bigger dick
So is there or has there been written articles on contingency plans or what if's in the case interstellar travel becomes viable? Do we have a set first planet to visit first (besides Mars)? What kind of governmental system do they plan on using? I can't imagine everyone getting to be degenerate as hell in confined spaces.
What about in case aliens attack? Do we have a plan that's grounded in known physics, of what's possible and what's not?
If there have been, can someone give me some links, please?
>>8992612
>> interstellar travel becomes viable
Fat chance of that happening anytime soon buddy.
So:
No.
NOOO.
NOPE.
>>8992626
>Fat chance of that happening anytime soon buddy.
Meh, maybe, maybe not.
The folks at CERN could discover a new fundamental force, or something similar.
Just imagine if we could suddenly manipulate gravity and acceleration as well as we control electromagnetism.
Or what about the Chinese quantum satellite?
They're experimenting with using entangled particles to send encryption keys (so nobody can eves drop on the key without destroying it).
OK, entanglement doesn't apparently involve FTL comms, but what if we develop spin-modulation radio?
Then we suddenly learn that pulsars (or some other source) are carrying data because they're modulated in a way we've never used before ourselves?
And then there's AI, or some other manifestation of exponential growth of technology.
And what if some country has been developing some kind of interstellar drive tech in secret?
All far-fetched of course, but there's got to be a million ways we could suddenly get there.
It's pointless to even think about alien attacks. If that was somehow to happen, which is almost impossibly unlikely, anything that is advanced enough to reach us is also so advanced that they can do anything they want.
It's too early to think about these things, I doubt we will ever manage to leave the solar system.
>tfw fell for the civil engineering meme
>>8992236
Good riddance, gullible idiots shouldn't breed.
On a more serious note, what do you not like about it and why did you choose it?
>>8992248
I really liked it, too bad there are no jobs when your country isn't shitting buildings and infrastructure everywhere for GDP growth (read China)
>>8992264
Easy solution. Move to China.
>only just smart enough to comprehend how dumb I am
Whats the quickest and safest way to kill ones self?
>>8991465
Visit you local ghetto and call someone a nigger
>>8991470
why anon that doesn't sound safe or easy
>>8991465
rolling in thumbtacks
WAT IS THE MEANING OF LYFE /sci/?
please no meme answers
>>8991376
To increase entropy as quickly as possible.
>>8991376
we don't know and it's possible we never will
t. absurdist
2 succ tha BBC
Is B.o.B right?
Is the earth flat?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCA8HofWsxc
If the earth is so flat, explain mountains.
>>8991317
Yes he is.
You happy now?
>>8991320
not really
The government needs to admit the truth.
Why are the uniformitarian evolutionists actively suppressing evidence contrary to their worldview?
http://www.icr.org/geological-strata
http://creation.com/geomorphology-provides-evidence-for-global-flood
https://answersingenesis.org/the-flood/global/worldwide-flood-evidence/
>>8991130
No TerryA.Davis there was no period when the planet was filled with water that got away somehow magically.
1. there was also no period when all animals were sick and inbread
2.all fish didn't die because of the mixing of salty and normal water
3. No animal would survive in an altitude of higher than mountain everest
4. I am pretty sure i am not inbread
5. Who da fuck made the pyramids? 12 people?
6.i beleive the minoans and some chinks are older than the estimated time of creation
BTW About fish:
If the waters got mixed and then seperated and the fish that exist now in normal water cannot live in salt water then that means they definitely evolved in a way that does not allow them to exist in salt water like their ansestors.
Also get a book on evolution it's not that hard to understand you deepshit
>>8991145
>was filled with water that got away somehow magically.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jun/13/earth-may-have-underground-ocean-three-times-that-on-surface
>1. there was also no period when all animals were sick and inbread
>2.all fish didn't die because of the mixing of salty and normal water
>implying their genetic/environmental state was the same now as then
>3. No animal would survive in an altitude of higher than mountain everest
A source for that claim would be nice.
>4. I am pretty sure i am not inbread
As with 1 and 2, our genetics are more degraded now than they were then.
>5. Who da fuck made the pyramids? 12 people?
>not knowing Biblical history
>6.i beleive the minoans and some chinks are older than the estimated time of creation
What methods were used? Ones that would only date over 6,000 years ago I bet.
>If the waters got mixed and then seperated and the fish that exist now in normal water cannot live in salt water then that means they definitely evolved in a way that does not allow them to exist in salt water like their ansestors.
>implying God didn't give them a large amount of variations, and that now they've most of that due to degradation and entropy, a byproduct of the fall
>Also get a book on evolution it's not that hard to understand you deepshit
I did, they convinced me that such things are merely the morbid fantasies of godless humans.
>>8991152
Also, on the topic of races.
So I just read https://www.withouthotair.com/
This seems to be the best overview of the topic.
His conclusion is that even with perfect execution of the optimal strategy it will be very difficult to transition to renewables. Without fusion there is no long term future.
And then there is politics. Politically feasible renewables could get to e.g. 10% of total energy in the UK.
All the world's deserts would need to be covered in photovoltaic cells given realistic yield rates.
We are done for, people. Even ignoring global warming, the non-renewables are going to run out within decades.
> We live in the end times.
I want to believe it's not so. Anyone got anything?
>>8991037
There are non renewables for a long time and then there's the magical beautiful nuclear energy. Eventually the retarded liberals will stop being so mad about it.
If thorium reactors come then all the better, if not we still have traditional ones.
>>8991050
As I understand it the issue leftists have with nuclear reactors is that you can expect to have a problem every couple of decades where shit goes wrong and the consequences are catastrophic for the local area.
>>8991050
> There are non renewables for a long time
Not really. Given population growth and economic growth especially in the developed world this is not the case.
> magical beautiful nuclear energy
Without breeder reactors this is also a very limited resource. Breeder reactors mean inevitable nuclear war.
> thorium
Also in limited supply, worse than Uranium 235.
Can anyone do better than this?
As the author of the book - physics professor - points out, we need numbers and facts not hand-waving arguments and adjectives.
Does /sci/ fear death and what potentially comes after it?
>>8991006
I don't fear it, but I certainly don't want it. As for what potentially comes after it, nothing.
The only reason I don't want to die is because there is so much left in this world for me to learn.
>>8991006
As much as i like living, i feel that dying would be quite comforting.
Hey /sci/ give me ideas for stupidly simple inventions and ideas you thought of but have lacked the business knowledge to pursue.
Real guns that look like toy guns
Suicide rope that glows in the dark
dyson spheres
Do you guys think meditation was pushed by an anti-science crew?
You can do a simple google image search for 'meditation' and conclude the target audience is female. As a man used to firing neurons to figure out if a statement is true or not, you can easily feel how meditation numbs the mind if you give it a shot, destroying your brain's ability in the long term to separate reality from non-reality, which is a perfect slave mentality.
It's very reasonable to expect productivity to be very low for meditators. Meditators can't work on their own. Every single meditation community is amazingly brain dead. In philosophical terms meditation is like the reverse of Plato's/Socrates Allegory of the Cave, it is a man going from enlightening to darkness and reversing himself into a dark silent creature observing meaningless uninteresting shadows in a cave wall until his death.
I really wish I'm wrong about this, and that a meditator here on /sci/ will use his gained brain powers to fully and exhaustively convince me I'm wrong along with explaining how meditation increased his general productivity.
>>8990429
You are talking out of your ass. Mindfullness meditation seems very useful. I wish I had the patience to actually do it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_on_meditation
https://www.coursera.org/learn/mindfulness
https://www.coursera.org/learn/science-of-meditation
>>8990429
introspection is NEVER a bad thing. whatever your methods of achieving such are your own, but who am i to criticize one over another?
I want to make a small prototype of a star generator. My question, is there some sort of catalogue or resource about stars and their properties so I can get min/max/avg values of known stars. I am interested in size, temperature, density, chemical composition etc. No, this isn't my homework.
>>8989739
Even more important OP, Magnetic or inertial containment?
>>8989747
I don't need it very detailed for now.
>>8989747
Well, we don't wan't a molten neighborhood when you'll try that thing.
> in 1880s was 1 in 70
>1920s 1 in 50
>1970s 1 in 10
>2000s 1 in 2
by 2020 the rate will be close to 80%
has society ever been unprepared as it is now on a known epidemic threat?
the most urgent issue is being ignored and side-lined by manufactured political hysteria: climate change and such
>inb4 elderly disease or improved diagnostic
childhood rates are rising a lot faster than that.
For example, rates have gone up 60 percent in the UK in just 16 years. Similar statistics are present in Germany.
This is perhaps the most striking evidence that cancer rates are actually rising due to environmental factors and not just increased life expectancy.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/09/03/modern-life-is-killing-our-children-cancer-rate-in-young-people/
>>8989579
heart is more likely to stop beating than cancer killing you post 80.
Cancer is a 30-80 year old disease
Something is definitely fucky
>>8989579
it is 1 in 2 people. meaning 50% of the population
http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/risk/lifetime-risk
http://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/study-says-nearly-1-in-2-canadians-to-develop-cancer-in-their-lifetime-1.3468455
>>8989584
>Citing blogs on sci
Reminder that billion has 12 zeroes
>>8989542
This vexes me
>>8989542
1,000,000,000
Wait
>>8989542
Shut up krautfag
As I understand it, cancer and aging are basically gene transcription errors.
One is a deviation from the genetic blueprint, and the other is the slow fading of the blueprint until the body can no longer be healed or re-grown according to plan.
At least, that's my crude understanding of the two. I'm open to correction.
With that in mind, is it possible to not just prevent these things, but reverse them?
For example, you see identical twins with slightly different facial abnormalities. They have the same genetic plan, but in both cases the plan played out differently due to a kind of youthful aging, gene transcription errors that are made early on and cause no real harm. You also see benign forms of cancer or unwanted cell growth such as moles or birth marks.
If it's possible to reduce the risk of cancer and slow the aging process, is it also possible to have the genetic blueprint play out flawlessly, with near-complete facial symmetry and full development of the body?
>>8989527
Let me answer your question with another; where would you even begin to change things? There are so many types of cancer and so many potential oncogenes (cancer risk genes) that decreasing susceptibility to one type might lead to increased risk of another, or other lethal health conditions.
>>8989535
add multiple expressions for tumor suppression proteins like elephants have. about half of cancers progress due to the gene for trp-53 becoming corrupted.
telomerase (enzyme for lengthening telomeres) is also overexpressed in cancer cells but strongly related to aging; hence the immortal HeLa cell line ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HeLa ).
a start would be genetically engineering elephants to overexpress telomerase, since to begin with they have several copies of tumor suppression genes.
>>8989544
and no i dont proofread my posts.