Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 2080. page

>>7719921
we're doing it
it's called 'software testing'
look it up b i a t c h
rekt

>>7719921
What kind of experimentation? The sort that would be unethical if performed on people?

If it was demonstrably sapient, then no.

>>7719933
>The sort that would be unethical if performed on people?

I'm thinking social sciences. Thousands of AIs in a double blind randomized controlled experiment. On one side, you have a control society, and on the other side you have an experimental society, where you change some policy like taxes or a regulation to look at its effects. Time would be accelerated and we will be able to see its effects in 5, 10, or 20 years.

Then they would be reset.

cocaine

>>7723342
>be me
>snackaroonies
>>>

>>7723342
>various fruit chews
>sriracha cashews
I try to take it easy on the snacking, though. It's easy to get fat.

Back when I took QM, I'd stay up all night and go through a box of donuts before 2 am. Gained 20 lbs that semester.

More & more people making careers in "green" bullshit who will profit from more government mandates.

Liberals becoming even more vocal on their stupid memes

>>7723278
Are you slow? The problem isn't that we don't know about these technologies, it's that most people don't care enough to fund them and actually make them viable on a large scale. That's why scientists are so vocal, because we need to develop these technologies but politicians want to keep most of our budget in fossil fuels and military.

>>7723369
They don't though.
Even at the high level paris talks, all they were talking about was sustaining the Earth rather than fixing it.

We have the tech, but no one cares to use it. They just put plugs in their ears and go "la la la la la the world's gonna explode la la la la la can't fix it"

File: 1447521921760.png (264KB, 647x437px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 647x437px

>>7723073
Smart people are being excluded from reproduction. Women choose to mate with the most brutal and anti-intellectual of all males. Sexual selection favors douchebaggery over intellect. Smart people will go extinct within the next generation. Welcome to idiocracy.

>>7723077

>I'm so smart I still can't find out how to attract a female

>Literally everyone who has had sexual intercourse must fit within a specific portion of the bell curve that is coincidentally just below where i stand

Fucking neckbeards.

>>7723077
So is this a cycle humans go through? We made it too easy for the dumb people?

>>7723024
It literally tells you how in the question...

>>7723035
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheffer_stroke

>>7723035
so... should I simply remove the negation and That's it?

They fucked up the docking procedure and had to do it manually without the autopilot

Shit was tense

File: Mcavoy.gif (476KB, 188x174px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 188x174px

>>7722644
>mfw

It was like Interstellar™

File: APOLLO11.jpg (414KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 800x600px

>>7722642
>bongs are excited because that europe they hate so much sent one of their countrymen on the iss
i am laughing

>>7722495
Mars is the most likely candidate to sustain life.

Because Mars is the next logical step in the human expansion into space. If something were to happen to the Earth, a colony in space should be able to sustain itself indefinitely. It's much much harder to do this on Venus than it is on Mars. Mars has readily available water and other resources and we can live on or under the surface. Venus has none of that, and even if it does, it's not easily accessible.

Venus is too dangerous. Mars is the most habitable planet for humans in the Solar System after Earth.

>>7722484
keep the time measurments we have.

it would be a drag to invent a whole new refference system for people to use

how do we deal with dofferent calendars?

Use GMT for everything.

>>7722407
Practice my friend. Do a lot of problems, and eventually you'll get the hang of it.

>>7722407
Do the work.

Do math as a hobby and try to discover some stuff on your own.

Simple expression is needed.

>>7722261
i think you can use the law of cosines..?

Do you know how to solve it? I need your mind power, dear scientist!

\documentclass[
a4paper,
12pt,
fleqn,
oneside,
titlepage,
%liststotoc, % Verzeichnisse im Inhaltsverzeichnis auffuehren
%bibtotoc, % Literaturverzeichnis im Inhaltsverzeichnis auffuehren
%idxtotoc, % Index im Inhaltsverzeichnis auffuehren
]{scrartcl}


\usepackage[ngerman]{babel}%babel managt die Spracheinstellungen des Dokuments. Für Deutsch gibt es german und ngerman (new german). Die Unterschiede liegen in der Silbentrennung.
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
%Richtiger Typografischer Setzkasten. Ö ist Ö und nicht "O"+".."
%Unglücklicherweise lässt dieses Package Die Schriftart wie Scheiße aussehen. Kommentiere fontenc sowie lmodern aus und du wirst sehen, was ich meine. Gelöst wird dieses Problem indem man Package lmodern benutzt
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % Umlaute schreiben koennnen ;)
%utf8 ist inzwischen der internationale Standard und sollte meiner Meinung nach bevorzugt werden. Der [Enkodierer] muss allerdings mit dem Editor abgestimmt werden. (Siehe Optionen)
\usepackage{textcomp}% Bestimme Zeichen einsetzen, wie °, ",...
\usepackage{lmodern}% Schriftart Latin Modern. Sieht schön aus. Scheint auch der Standart von inputenc zu sein, allerdings muss man explizit dieses Package benutzen, wenn man gleichzeitig fontenc einsetzt.

>>7722166

%Für den Fall, dass der Nutzer nicht mit den vorgegeben Übersetzungen der Bezeichnungen einverstanden ist, besteht die Möglichkeit diese zu ändern:
%\renewcommand{\<Bezeichner>name}{Neue Bezeichnung}


%
% For alternative styles, see the biblatex manual:
% http://mirrors.ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf
%
% The 'verbose' family of styles produces full citations in footnotes,
% with and a variety of options for ibidem abbreviations.
%
%\usepackage{csquotes}%bin mir nicht sicher, ob ich das brauche

%\usepackage[style=verbose, bibencoding=auto, backend=biber]{biblatex}
%\usepackage[style=authoryear-icomp, backend=biber]{biblatex}
\usepackage[
backend=biber,
style=custom-numeric-comp,
sortlocale=de_DE,
natbib=true,
url=false,
doi=true,
eprint=false
]{biblatex}


%custom-numeric-comp
%Es funktioniert bei mir nicht ohne bibtex. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob biber fehlt, oder es ein anderes Problem gibt.

%Ich benutze nicht numeric comp, sondern einen Style gefunden auf
%http://www.khirevich.com/latex/footnote_citation/
%Befehle
%\notefullcite %Die ist am besten, denn es ergeben sich [6]
%\superfullcite
%\supershortnotecite

% wenn man als Backend bibtex benutzen möchte. Default ist biber \usepackage[style=authortitle-ibid, backend=bibtex]{biblatex}
%zusätzlich habe ich authortitle-dw von.dominik-wassenhoven.de installiert, um genau den Zitationsstil zu bekommen, den mein Prof wollte
%Das war der aus der Vorlage %\usepackage[style=verbose-ibid,backend=bibtex]{biblatex}


% < LITERATURVERZEICHNIS ANGEBEN >
\bibliography{literatur} %old way, bibtex
%\addbibresource{literatur}%biber


%Einbinden von Grafiken, Pdf und sonstigem
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{pdfpages} % PDF-Seiten einbinden
\usepackage{epstopdf} % eps-Bilder

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\begin{document}

>>7722003
>defined
x^0=x^(n-n)=x^n/x^n=1

>>7722054
What is the difference between this and this:

suppose that a = b
then a2 = ab
subtracting b2 from both sides gives us a2 – b2 = ab – b2
factorising gives (a + b)(a-b) = b(a-b)
dividing both sides by a-b gives a+b = b <- Here is the problem, we are not allowed to divide by zero!
But also a+b = b+b = 2b, so 2b = b. Dividing by b gives 2 = 1

We are not allowed to divide by zero because it results in shit, yet we are allowed to exponentiate n-n which also results in shit. What am I missing?

>>7722054
>>7722094
also x doesnt need to be x

5^0 / 3^0 = 1

>>7721989
we can't have that even in theory retard.

now making a shit ton of energy is something else, so nuclear is the way to go. harnessing atomic forces is the best way to obtain energy. we might find new elements work better than what we currently use, but other than that i see no other solution we can exploit

>>7721989
A trillion count array of lightyear long piezoelectric crystals.

>>7721989
kill fat people
use fat as fuel
profit???

File: 1449374313596.gif (301KB, 254x200px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 254x200px

>>7721875
>I used to count my orgasms when it first started happening, but once I regularly began to push the 20+ limit I stopped.

>>7721879
I'm not joking, I had to start jerking off with my left arm because my right side was getting noticeably bigger. Now I just alternate and use it as an upper body workout

>>7721883
so wait

are you still horny after you orgasm?

It's 9. You're retarded just for doubting it.

>>7721385
6/6 is 1 m8

>>7721385
this