Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 2059. page

It's like finding a baby in woman's vagina without her being fucked. Nope. It's 50/50

>>7738511
>Who is Jesus Christ

>>7738502
That's a 50/50
What version of Minesweeper is that?

It would create an incredibly large number of exotic particles that would could use to warp space and travel faster than light

>>7738404
Lava is made of some relatively heavy elements that wouldn't be able to sustain fusion for long. It'd probably make a pretty big boom.

**THIS POST IS ONLY SUPPORTED ON GENTOO**

E=mc^2 energy and matter are one in the same, which i think you're not understanding from your argument. Other than that, neutron stars are almost completely composed of neutrons (we think) and therefore "very solid" with no full atom structures to create empty space they're extremely dense.

You clearly have no idea what the word "solid" actually describes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid

>>7738146
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid
So being solid is kind of an illusion then. Some atoms are resisting changing their formation, but there is nothing really lay-person-solid there?

File: Dancing Pepe.gif (57KB, 74x98px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 74x98px

Please tell me how to remember Stokes Theorem, the Divergence theorem, Greens theorem and all of Lin Alg please

>>7738025
>Put the limit on the outside, nigga, and that's the side that's gonna be bigga!

my sides

>>7738025
Literally who can't remember Fatou's lemma

It's one of the few intuitively obvious results

Since one's named after the moon of the Earth, why not go for another moon's name?

>Deimos/Phobos for maximal edge
>Callisto
>Titan
>Io
>Atlas

actually just refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_natural_satellites

File: 1442372865145.jpg (9KB, 268x188px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 268x188px

>>7738014

Name him Muhammad

Also,

>Astrology-themed Puppy Name
>Astrology

wew lad

It doesn't.

I have a BS in Pure math, an MS in Applied Math and I'm finishing up an MS in MechE and PhD in Applied Math. My research is in stability/bifurcation theory and control theory. For the MSME, my reaearch is in robotics/control theory.

Shit happens, senpai. You just get the itch.

>>7737816
>bachelors in neuroscience

If you had a PhD in neuro coupled with an engineering degree that would've been ideal for a research career, but if you do your BEng/MEng now you're pretty much only going to have access to same jobs any other Biomed BEng/MEng has.

Honestly I know you said you lost your passion, but if you don't go to grad-school for neuro you've pretty much wasted the last 4 years of your life.

>>7737820
I'm not interested in pursuing research, I would like to create a legacy for myself and future family. Why would I pursue a career I have no passion for when I could change now? I will never be a great neuro scientist, I may be great at innovating bio/mechanical inventions which work with the brain.

I don't think I'd be useful, these guys have already figured fusion power out. My primitive western education might as well be in alchemy.

>>7737751
You can even see in the picture the shitty neighbourhoods surrounding the laboratory. They couldn't even bother to take it from a good angle that only showed the 'progress' they fake by doing this shit.

Other than that, good for them. Hopefully they actually have scientists that can do research that has never been done before. So that when the dictatorship falls in a couple of decades North Korea joins the academic community and we can advance our technology a bit faster.

They probably have a high IQ population. It's sad that they are still political shit.

>>7737751
>You can even see in the picture the shitty neighbourhoods surrounding the laboratory. They couldn't even bother to take it from a good angle that only showed the 'progress' they fake by doing this shit.

By shitty neighbourhoods you mean commie blocks? They don't nessescarily have to be shitty but in general they are, but lets not judge to quickly.

I do not think that the dictatorship will fall in a couple decades. They have big plans when it comes to nuclear energy, and it would be great to replace to coal plants with. I kind of see North Korea like Solaria in Isaac Asimov's novels...We don't really know what stuff is going on there.

>>7737703
NASA is a joke. The real innovation happens though military contracts: R&D

>>7737703
This is some proper quality bait. I'm impressed :p. Only sad thing is that people might actually think this is real.

>>7737703
I'd literally suck Elon Musk's dick if he'd let me. Honestly, I love the fuck out of the guy no homo

>>7737551
>Philosophy is a quest for objectivity just like science

Science is not a quest for objectivity. Science is phenomenological.

>nd just to be fair, there's a lot of philosophies out there that are actually bullshit,

the problem is there is no clear way to tell what is valuable insight and what is meaningless sophistry. Philosophy lacks a mechanism for self-correction, this is why science pays it no heed. Being right isn't what matters, only being able to PROVE you are right does.

>>7737562
>Science is not a quest for objectivity. Science is phenomenological.

I agree, but do you think scientists know that? I don't think so. As far as i can tell, scientists do not only think science is a quest for objectivity but it is also the only source of objective knowledge.

>>7737568
No scientist thinks that. Philosophers are just full of themselves.

>>7737327
Read Hall and Knight or G. Chrystal

>>7737327
A rigorous book usually follows the Definition, Proposition, Theorem, Discussion structure, yeah.

Also what the fuck is this book you're reading? Why don't you use something more modern for elementary algebra like Khan academy or something? And elements? What the fuck are you doing bro? Please, take a look at a real mathematics curriculum and learn following the syllabi if you're really interested in doing math.

If you already did a chunk of apostol's calculus you're ready for linear algebra, I like Hoffman & Kunze but Axler's good too. If you want rigor you can do analysis, lectures from youtube searching Real Analysis are pretty nice.

>>7737344
I guess it lacks the discussion part then.

>Why don't you use something more modern for elementary algebra like Khan academy or something?
I was told rigour was important. Khan Academy hardly has a rigorous approach to algebra. I already know the subject, but not rigorously.

The elements I just read as a historic thing, not to learn Geometry.

The book itself might be the issue, but I'm having a bit of issue seeing what "counts" as rigour and formality and what does not.

http://www.luf.org/

>>7737257
http://techcrunch.com/2015/12/21/spacex-successfully-lands-a-giant-falcon-9-rocket-for-the-first-time/?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000591

>>7737207
You have any idea how empty hospitals would be with out space exploration?

It'll be my first time doing any tutoring, so emphasis on the "advice". For sure I won't spoonfeed, but I don't have a specific way I'd teach anybody.

>>7737037
Don't really know what to say about Calc, but I can definitely give you some advice about tutoring O Chem. I tutor it actively and did for about two years before. Plus I TA an OChem lab. I'll give you advice wherever I can.

>>7737061
Yeah, anything helps. I basically came out on the top of the class for both parts of the sequence and out of nowhere the professor offers me the position for ochem; I haven't the slightest clue how to teach.

>>7736742

>Could it be that the power of a force is inversely proportional to the range that it must act across?

No.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

>>7736742
>k/(Force of the force when two objects are touching)=(distance where force is half as much as when the two objects are touching)?

No. For instance, that is actually the same distance for gravity and electromagnetism! Both follow an inverse-square law where the force at a distance d is half the force at d/sqrt2.

>>7738995
The only reason it seems like gravity has a longer range than electromagnetism is just that matter in general is composed of equal numbers of positive and negative charges, so large bodies have almost zero net charge*. Gravity, however, attracts everything, so large bodies build up a truly enormous gravitational "charge". This is why gravity dominates the universe, despite seeming so weak.

*the same goes for magnetism: Since every magnetic dipole has a North and South pole right next to one another, over long distances they cancel out.

>>7735972
Suck his dick.

>>7735972
you dont want to be
>say goodbye to your weekends

make sure you have at least one side project, two if youre in your first 2-3 years.
Dont suck at presenting your results at lab meeting ie be prepared and not half asleep.

Because you're being tested on your ability to do something that could be programmed into a programmable calculator, obviously.

>>7735828
What the point?
We don't need that ability anymore.

File: SlideRule.jpg (19KB, 456x347px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 456x347px

slide rule precision was enough to get to the Moon