Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 2063. page

x=1.2872122

>>7734677
x=x

>>7734685
bingo

>>7734007

Try expressing it in a Banach space first, then it should be trivial.

File: qxUmQvx.png (29KB, 3000x1250px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 3000x1250px

>>7734011
This

x^log_x(a) = a

File: nobels-by-region2.jpg (375KB, 1251x657px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1251x657px

>>7733932
Because rankings actually evaluate how concentrated research is. In the US you have a few excellent unis and lots of shit ones while in Europe, virtually all are very good.

Besides, education quality =/= research quality.

>>7733944
>rankings

What rankings are you referring to?

File: 1231947191714.jpg (48KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 184x184px

>>7733944
>comparing dozens of countries to a single one and claiming superiority

Eurocucks everyone.

A = [a,b]

A is a set. It can be an interval, but it really can be any measurable set

>>7733761
Thanks, from now on I will write all of my integrals like that.

>>7732998
Behavioral econ is pretty scientific. Observe people and things. Take samples. Make an inference. Make model to predict behaviour. About as sciency as you can get really.

>>7733013
is it falsifiable?

>>7733013

>actually believes this

>>7732465
>too long before I get jittery and do something else
aka its too hard. either keep at it or do art history

>>7732467
It's not hard most of the time, I just grow interest in other things, I enjoy too many aspects of life, I can't stick with something for 4 years, it's just too much, you might be right but I just can't stick with something. So little time in the world and I just love too much.

How do I keep at it? I get depressed and unable to function if I stick with one thing for too long.

>>7732468
I do the same thing to be honest. I've even gotten pretty good at a few of them, but I keep getting interested in a lot of new stuff.

Ok. So?

>>7732003
I fucking hated Voyager.

>>7732003
Why didn't you do ME you retard? Literally why I didn't do EE it's too abstract for me.

>>7734870

This is a simple combination problem because mushroom/tomato is the same as tomato/mushroom. There are [math]C(50, 50)[/math] ways to choose 50 toppings from 50, there are [math]C(50, 49)[/math] ways to choose 49 toppings from 50, etc.

>>7734874

3x2x1 gives 6 different pizzas with 3 topping choices but in reality the answer is 7 because you can have each topping on it's own too.

>>7734885

With three topping choices you can either choose three toppings or choose two toppings or choose one topping. There are [math]C(3,3)[/math] ways to choose three toppings, [math]C(3,2)[/math] ways to choose two toppings, and [math]C(3,1)[/math] ways to choose one topping. That means there are
[eqn]C(3,3) + C(3,2) + C(3,1) = 7[/eqn]
ways to choose toppings.

Your factorial answer [math]3 \times 2 \times 1[/math] is not correct. It's a combination problem.

Cut your dick off to achieve
>maximum flaccidity
>minimum penis volume
>actual contribution to the human race

>>7734233
If I cut off my dick it would become less flaccid though. I want to know if I'm experiencing the maximum flaccidity.

>>7734236
Cutting off your dick would let all of the blood out.
Flaccidity is determined by the amount of blood not in your penis.
Therefore;
Cut off your penis for maximum flaccidity.
Q.E.D.

>>7734088
How can a glass hold air if it's sometimes surrounded by air?

>>7734092
But it doesn't hold air. It's empty

go away Jaden Smith

Get your nursing degree. Reenlist as an 03/04 in the medical corps.

Bump twicely.

Bioengineering is useless without a masters OP

You just change bounds so you can do dx then dy, or whatever order is easiest, then integrate separately usually. Sometimes you'll change to polar or spherical coordinates. This is a generalization though.

>>7733605
You integrate with respect to the product measure.

>>7733609
Is it harder than normal Riemann integration?

File: 2015-12-20 08.21.01 pm.png (82KB, 229x203px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 229x203px

Everyone single one should contribute his or her part to the evolution and progress of humanity into the interstellar space and other frontiers of the future. In this sense, we should actually think like a swarm and focus our intellect to tackle problems and expand our borders of knowledge. We face the ’tragedy of the commons’: individuals of society are acting independently in their own interest and often contrary to the best interest of our species because they are depleting government budget money into bullshit programs and not spending enough on science.

Much more of the budget should be spent on research, space exploration and much less on military, foreign policy, and welfare bullshit. Nowadays, almost every member of society gets taken care of, no matter how useless the person is. I absolutely hate people who do not live up to their full potential but chose to lead lazy lives. We need to re-introduce Darwinism into society, there is no need to keep all the bottom-feeders of society well-off. Those who are lazy and do not live up to their full potential of contribution to humanity should not be taken care off, there are over 7 billion people on the planet. We should focus on the ones who want to make a difference, not who keep us back as a species.

Finally, to abstract and make it simple: most of the budget is coming from taxes and the majority of tax payers are morons. These morons elect politicians to push-through their moron-ideas, they are unlikely to push funding for science.

If you are in a position like me where you don’t agree how the budget is spent, your only option is to be a science-funding “Robin Hood”, that is for example to run a successful company that extracts money from morons through exploting their love for laziness (like facebook, instagram, buzzfeed, etc.). This money can then be used to contribute to research you find useful, i.e. privately add funds to where you think the government is not funding enough.

It's honestly not a bad idea. It sounds exactly the same as how public bitcoin funds would be used in Facebook or Twitter posts. All you would do is click on the address as you would a link. Micro transactions are done without fee, extremely easily to whatever cause is supported by the people using that address with just a multi-key wallet for explicit unanimous consent.

File: 1381115167891.gif (793KB, 360x203px) Image search: [Google]

793KB, 360x203px

uggh
the amount of fedora in this

>>7733142
Is that... Boxxy?

>>7733160
I guess so

>>7733160
She's far too attractive to be Boxxy and only has 300 layers of makeup as opposed to over 9000.

File: 1448489352171.jpg (36KB, 540x209px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 540x209px

>>7731761
no you are just a puss and its probably not irrational

>>7731761
Your fear is 100% justified. In modern slut culture 100% of women are competing for the attention of less than 20% of males (the so called "Chads"). If you're born a non-Chad, the best you can hope for is to get rich and to find a single mom in her 40's with 3 children from 4 fathers who reluctantly settles for a beta provider whom she more or less openly contempts.

File: 50 shades of grey.jpg (31KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 1024x576px

>>7731768
> 3 children
> 4 fathers
Biology fail.

> born a Chad
Says the fedorafag that doesn't want to do a thing to improve his life.

Get a fucking job. Learn a musical instrument. Lift. Learn how to talk to women. You aren't born a Chad. You make yourself one.

Or don't. I don't give a fuck.