What is the outlook on employment of a mechanical engineering degree 20 years from now?
jack of all trades master of none
you'll be relegated to being auto mechanics
serious answers please not NEET shitposting
>>7735536
ME will always be a solid discipline
ITT let's talk about degree in physics, research work, discovery forecast, physics ebin meme and related
Im thinking of studying physica as a degree so that i can get into expiremental deaign of qbit processors that use high temperature superconductors and magnetocaloric refridgeration
>>7735442
>degree
I prefer radians but ok.
Got my exams in 3 weeks, kill me
What is wrong with this video and way of thinking?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg0Z--pmPog
Everythiiiing... You have to like math to actually get good at it, just like any sport. Ofcourse you can call yourself not a math person because you sometimes can't understand it. Sometimes you understand just the basics. There are somethings the dude says that is true but overall it's all wrong
It's kind of over simplified. There are a lot of things that effect what makes someone "good" at math. I do think his core point, that anyone can get good at math, is largely correct (barring actual problems with the brain, like being too senile or having particular mental disabilities). I think it does a bad job of actually explaining why some people are bad at math, and others are good. There are a lot of reason that are more complex than just laziness. There are two which matter a lot which come to mind right now:
1) Who's teaching you, especially in the beginning before you can teach yourself effectively. If any of the first math teachers are bad, or encourage bad habits (like memorizing instead of understanding), then you'll have a lot of problems in the future.
2) Some people are able to pick things up more quickly, than others. This comes down to both innate mental ability, and also prior exposure to mathematical things. This again matters most in the beginning, its easier for someone to get lost in the beginning and have no real way of picking up the pieces on their own.
>>7735604
But he is talking in a general sense. Math is segragated for the geniuses and the cold calculative people because that's what we present. Kids want to explore discover be challenged, but we make them do 20 problems in their home then 5/10 problems in their exams and tata math.
/sci/ Can you help me get better at competitive programming? Please advise the required math to get better at it.
>>7735163
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Computer_Science_and_Engineering
Git gud.
>>7735263
> git
xDD nice bro I see what you did there
This thing triggered me pretty hard. You can't just suck up stars and shoot them out at shit.
Anyhow star wars science thread, what in star wars is scientifically plausible, what isn't?
>>7730168
>what in star wars is scientifically plausible
Nothing
Can all the manchildren leave /sci/ please.
>>7730171
>implying the force isn't real
hey /sci/ I have a question for all of you computer science majors out there. do you guys genuinely like computer science or are you just in the program for the job market?
I have to be honest, I don't like it at all. I'm afraid that I'm just so caught up in the STEM stigma that I'm going to bottle neck into a career that I honestly don't enjoy.
You're not gonna make it if you don't enjoy it desu
I like it. I did programming in high school, and went to study computer science in university to get my skills to the next level. I was not disappointed and I love the field. The job market is nice, it's what allowed me to pursue the activity I love, but it was a secondary consideration.
I love compsci but I hate web stuff. I'm seriously considering trying for a CE just to get farther away from things like WordPress.
Sup /sci/, need realitively simple crystals to grow, I've already tried the simple ones, but I'm looking for some more challenging ones I can do at home, I want to try out copper chloride, but no luck so far.
Get a high pressure high temperature chamber, run it for a few hundred years and you'll get some really impressive results.
I fucking hate crystals that humans can't make in a reasonable timeframe.
It's one of the few things you just can't fucking do.
I never knew people made crystals out of different shit as a hobby. I know nothing about this or how it works but it seems fun, can someone point me in the right direction?
>>7737416
It's fun because chemistry, but it's still a pain in the ass.
I'd recommend using Epsom salts (MgS), copper sulfate, or if you want copper chloride, i mixed copper sulfate and some plain salt together in hot water, DO NOT stick anything metal in it, it corrodes stuff really well.
if you want actual crystals of CuCl, then filter out the precipitate of the CuSO and NaCl, and then add water to it, dissolve it all, and then slowly evaporate the water over a few hours, should work
what's the cushiest job a person could get a degree in, where they have a ton of free time to do hobbies while still being on a lucrative salary?
be it engineering or science, applications or research, what tops it all in terms of income, schedule flexibility, and overall proficiency with science & math?
Imagination Engineer.
>>7736363
i said proficiency with math and science not dicks and manbutts.
I know what job you're talking about!
You're talking about being a millionaire who pays people to make himself more money.
thats a good dejree
Trivial Question to ponder:
When roughly were the majority of the world's current population born?
>>7735311
Between the 50's and 80's.
>>7735311
Is that a bionicle? Shit brings back so many memories
between now and then
Is math an invention or a discovery? Clearly our way of translating math is an invention.
Notice how these kinds of questions add nothing to mathematics?
This is why philosophy of mathematics is a waste of time.
>>7739704
>posting on 4chan
>calling something a waste of time
>it's a platonism thread
sage
Do you think its important to attend classes? I have social anxiety so i go to university only like 3 times a week. Havent seen much difference, since i can study everything with rate that is comfortobale for me, and you can find any information that you need in the internet.
I`m a computer science major, btw.
>>7739234
No. I didn't show up to my calc 3, linear algebra, or mechanics classes at all. Got As in all of them. I really prefer to just read the book and maybe watch some high quality lectures online.
>>7739238
Curious, where are you going to school that your lectures aren't quality enough? And why are you going there in the first place? I know that I obviously have to take initiative if I want to master these subjects but I don't see why I can't expect my professors to bring some quality to the table as well.
Does free will exist?
Pic unrelated
Please be more specific, your question is to ambiguous for me to answer
Depends on how you define free will.
A hard determinist would define it as "you have a choice without a cause", which is a no, because casualty is pretty much what underpins all of existence as we know it.
A soft determine would say that free a free act is one which doesn't rely on any causes outside of the one doing the action. From this definition, free will exists and casualty is preserved.
A libertarian perspective would say that you do and relies on the the braking of casualty and conservation of energy, and what that guy on Sixty Symbols refers to as "quantum physics woo".
>>7739125
If the universe somehow exactly returned to a prior state, would the history of the universe be cyclic?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/research-confirms-a-link-between-intelligence-and-life-expectancy/
"A more surprising discovery is that there is a strong link between mortality and IQ: higher intelligence means, on average, a longer life. This relationship has been extensively documented by Ian Deary and his colleagues at the University of Edinburgh using data from the Scottish Mental Surveys. In 1932, the Scottish government administered an IQ test to nearly all 11-year old children attending school on a single day. More than sixty years later, focusing on the city of Aberdeen, Deary and colleague Lawrence Whalley set out to identify who from the cohort was still alive, at age 76. The results were striking: a 15-point IQ advantage translated into a 21% greater chance of survival. For example, a person with an IQ of 115 was 21% more likely to be alive at age 76 than a person with an IQ of 100 (the average for the general population).
The link between IQ and mortality has now been replicated in upwards of 20 longitudinal studies from around the world, and has given rise to the field of cognitive epidemiology, which focuses on understanding the relationship between cognitive functioning and health. One major finding from this new field is that socioeconomic factors do not completely explain the IQ-mortality relationship. In one study, focusing on the Central Belt region of Scotland, researchers linked IQ scores for over 900 of the participants from the 1932 study to those participants’ responses on a national health survey conducted in the early 1970s. The researchers found that statistically controlling for economic class and a measure of “deprivation” reflecting unemployment, overcrowding, and other adverse living conditions accounted for only about 30% of the IQ-mortality correlation."
Well, /sci/, what do you think?
>>7738961
shocker, smarter people have better jobs, better living conditions, can afford medical care more often and take less physical risks.
Who would have thought.
>>7738979
Essentially this.
>>7738979
This, but the study isn't conclusive. On the otherhand officer workers sit on their ass all day and develop medical issues. Even with great medical care you can only live so long.
Are there any experts on physical attractiveness here?
-Is there a correlation between height and facial attractiveness? I know the girl on the picture, she is tiny yet has a cute face.
-Are brothers and sisters equally attractive? Or do you have to get "lucky" and get your parents best genes?
-Is there different ranges of physical attractiveness? What I mean by this is that someone is that you take 2 handsome man and put them next to each other, same body, they both have attractive faces, but one will always be considered more attractive than the other.
If you compare luke hemsworth to his brothers that will answer a few of your quesrions
>>7738748
For males it is more about how a female body moves more than physical looks at first.
>>7738748
>yet has a cute face
nice 1 m8
ok /sci. let's settle this once and for all. Is pure math or theoretical physics the master race of STEM?
i dont know
why not both?
You're a dumb faggot who by his 3rd year will realize he chose his major to impress anonymous virgin fags on an anime imageboard.