Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1915. page

Won't it be easier to get to mars if we build a base on the moon first?

File: feelraiser.jpg (99KB, 666x636px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 666x636px

>>7810674
>Don't you want to be the first person to fuck a hot chick on the moon?
>tfw no qt gf to make love with on the moon.

Feels really bad man.

MOON OLYMPICS

think about it

Please respond.

No.

it's based on some theory of mind, though

>>7810080
rotational momentum

>>7810080
>infinite speed
No such thing and not in terms of "that can't be" (we're talking about a 2d shape taking up 3d volume by rotation, being impossible in a real world sense isn't a factor) but because it doesn't make sense. Infinite isn't a quantity.

At an arbitrarily large speed?

One is a solid body and the other is a rotating 2D shape.

As for what differences this makes, think in terms of stuff like density and mass.

>>7810080
The difference is that one would be perfectly safe to touch, while the other would make your finger permanently invisible.

underrated thread

Okay, then go smoke all the bullshit you want dude. No one cares.

>>7809134
>tobacco allergy
And have you checked how common such an allergy is? Hmmmmm? Hmmmmmmmmmmm???

Congrats, you are practically a shoe in for a sales position at Best Buy™ with those credentials

>>7808829
I work for a recruiting company, but my job let's me know about many other people's jobs while unfortunately barely advancing at my own.

A major in math and knowledge of computers is quite flexible. I don't think you'll ever be stuck for work, but if you're determined to find a special niche, whether it be research or in a job, you'll have to carefully select your first entry level position or your next degree in education.

Math means you're a bright cookie, true or not. You just need to find out what you'd like to specialize in, which is hard, because how can you know before getting to the position? Well anyways, you have three years out of college until you start finding difficulty in specializing and getting entry positions.

May I ask what you'd like to do?

>>7808854
i'd like to try graphics programming to develop 3DCG applications that improve rendering times, verlet integration for cloth and hair, and so on. anything CGi oriented is what i'd like to do for the CS minor side.

on the math side, i like nonlinear PDEs and nonlinear functional analysis, and would like to contribute in those areas research-wise.

i just can't decide which hence my major/minor plan.

>>7808621
>>>/adv/

>>7808621
It's a TERRIBLE, HORRIBLE idea to self study analysis from Rudin.

First study calculus from something like stewart + mit ocw lectures. Then read a book on proofs like "How to prove it, a structured approach". Then you can start with analysis. Terence Tao's Analysis I and II are amazing books that guide you through the process of understanding formal math as well as giving you a construction of the number sets and a nice description of naive set theory which is amazing to have early on.

do NOT fall for the rudin meme. it's an amazing and concise reference book but it is notoriously terrible for self study

>>7808628
>It's a TERRIBLE, HORRIBLE idea to self study analysis from Rudin.
do NOT fall for the rudin meme
/thread

>>7808066
Oh, I have to integrate it from 0 to infinity.

>>7808069
I would do it for integers and try to prove the series is cauchy, maybe try that

>>7808076
I'll try that, thanks

Anyone has some advice?

Just give me an advice

Please

File: Hnk Grn.png (498KB, 656x814px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 656x814px

>>7808450
Entirely possible

>>7808450
>Multiverse Hypothesis

FTFY

>>7808450
It's probably wrong, but I like it anyways.

Nevermind senpai. Cant be done

>>7811589
Whats a top tier job?
If youre talking about money earning then the finance sector/entrepreneur is the only way to go. Every thing else will only make you a salary.

If youre talking about difficulty then thats more research science type stuff, breaking new ground and having to invent new ways of thinking.

Otherwise i dont really understand what you mean by top tier. Wow-ing other people? Be special forces or a fighter pilot.
Working with nature? Be a ranger or photographer

Theres no real answer here is there op

If it's established that "Each of them succeeds" prior to them actually trying, then 100% for both.

50%
they do or they dont

>>7811587
>>7811604
>Each of them succeeds with a 1% probability.

There is a 1/100 chance for each of them, that they succeed.

I will help you if you tell me where to get cube food.

>>7811502
http://www.bonappetit.com/entertaining-style/trends-news/article/food-cubes-art

I'm looking for a way to get from

[eqn]\mu\frac{\partial^2X}{\partial t^2}+EI\frac{\partial^4X}{\partial x^4}=0[/eqn]

to

[eqn]L^4\frac{\partial^2K}{\partial t^2}+T^2\frac{\partial^4K}{\partial x^4}=0[/eqn]

where X is displacement, and K curvature. Also do you know how to add non-linear terms to that eqaution?

>>7811458
Person B, hands down.
A person is no good if they cannot work with others.
I interviewed engineers at Berkeley for Boeing, and I turned down a guy with a 3.98 in EECS because he was such a pain to interview/speak with.

>>7811458
>>7811440

Great, but what were the mortality rates really like from the disease? You autists act like there is an outsized chance that you will even catch one of these diseases.

File: 1444784309393.jpg (99KB, 441x408px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 441x408px

>>7811464
Maybe you are just a shitty interviewer and judge of character

>>7811282

Well, I've taken around 1000 hours to complete this drawing because I have the most broken English you can imagine.

Basically, there are 9 balls. I want to know the probability of taking the 3-Ball and the 6-Ball.

They are mixed in the bag, and you can take two of them at random. It does not matter if you take them one by one or both at the same time.

Well the drawing says what I think is right, but I am not completely sure. Anyways, 2/9 would be the best probability you have, right?

Can somebody help me with this?

>>7811282

yes your right. now get off from board before you introduce more broking english. and also do not say goodbye please or thank you. i think mine english got more brokenst just from reading OP

>>7811300
Why are you so mean?

I only wanted to know about the ball's problem, i do not really care if my english is shit or if your english goes "brokenst", people can understand me, at least the first guy, who made fun of me

I thought this would be a fast thing to solve, you know, make a drawing, explain the problem, show a solution and wait for someone to tell me if I am right or not