How did something as complex as inflammatory response develop evolutionarily?
I believe it should be the central idea in the creationist "argument for complexity" rather than the eye, which is straightforward sensory.
>>7810242
You'd only say that because you don't understand the idea of irreducible complexity.
>>7810242
Organism develops mutation that provides basic remediation in cases of cellular trauma --> organism survives and passes on gene with high success. Over a long of time frame, more genetic alterations are selected for in favor of an immune system -- both adaptive and innate.
>>7810289
so you're saying the evolutionary need for a penis happened to evolve at the exact same time as the vagina? gender is the ultimate counter argument to evolution.
checkmate atheists
Virtually every scientist I've known or read about eventually got married and had a family, despite their alleged autism and anti-social behavior.
Why this deception?
>>7810004
>alleged autism and anti-social behavior
[Citation needed]
>>7810004
What deception exactly?
Autism is a mental deficiency. Why would you be surprised that famously smart people AREN'T autistic?
If you only eat soup, do you poop or piss it out?
>>7809964
Yes
>>7809964
You piss it out, but with your butt.
Ensuring feuds liquified in your stomach anyway. So, like everything else, you poop out what you don't absorb and piss out what you do.
I would love to know what books you guys recommend both applications and theory for mathematics majors.
From programming languages to implementations to automata theory.
Pic related
SICP
>>7807540
>>7807540
Why the fuck is it Quadrant , shouldn't it be quadrant 2?
>>7811167
Fuck meant Quadrant 1 first
>>7811167
Post.
>>7810537
>3. So the manifold of F is undifferentiable.
Yeah, okay.
>>7810537
>If a manifold is differentiable then it is smooth
This is wrong.
>>7810560
>>7810553
It's still arguable. Ultimately, it is true that the polynomial equation that is differentiable is smooth, certainly in this particular case.
With reference to post 2, the relations of the manifold referred to in item 3 are similar to my first statement in this post.
More importantly, I do think that the intuitive type of statements in the pattern in the posted Hodge Conjecture proof is fun. However, only as playful activity. Really the proof is appropriate to this forum.
And so on. I thought we just joke on here?
Anyway, I am not going on here any more because the pattern of thinking on here as joking is just nasty and unreasonable - with reference to Christianity and rational interest and other types of valuable items.
Is it possible for magic to be real?
Only if wizards are using magic to make us muggled believe that the idea or magic is completely retarded and impossible
>>7810386
meme magic is real
>>7810386
No, then it wouldn't be magic, which it isn't
So what happened to this faggot? Why is there no news from him?
>>7810285
Just another retard who spent every day of his childhood learning maths at a ridiculous fast rate to please his parents and now that he made it to academia he is just another cog. Another small name in the lists that from time to time comes up with another published paper that will change nothing and no one will read. All for what? He could be have enjoyed his youth a bit more and then become what he is now but it is too late to think about that now. He has to publish another useless paper that literally no one will read or else he will get thrown out from whatever shithole he is currently in.
He's probably done more triple integrals than Newton did at his age. Don't you think he's done enough for science already?
>>7810297
>co-authoring 1 insignificant paper
>done enough for science already
Niga are you serious?
nonlinear functional analysis
what's it good for? can it answer significant questions in science and math?
my prof said learning it would make me emperor tier in the math community. is there any weight to this?
Its useful. Its interesting, and yes it has applications in physics theory and pde theory, as well as geometry and geometric analysis. I'm sure there's more. It won't make you 'emperor tier' at anything, its just another field of math, and one fairly useful to an analyst.
>>7809231
Isn't it the basis of Quantum Mechanics?
>emperor tier in the math community
>something that won't get grants because it's too abstract with no applications
Your Prof is an idiot if he actually told you to do this what your career. He should be telling you to get the fuck out of Pure Maths as soon as possible and get something that gives you some practical skills so you can leave Academia if you can't make it.
Which sadly, with the quality of teaching, projects and supervision. It will happen sooner rather than later for most people.
Wait, is this true?
It is supposedly true for all x, y, n, and m that are real.
>>7809002
This is actually kind of a big deal guys. Try to solve the equation
[math] 2^x + 3^x = 11[/math] without it. You need to use Taylor Series yes?
This equation kind of circumvents that, to an extent.
Some youtube guy from London claims to have made it.
>>7809002
Yes.
Because
[math]
\frac{log(1 + x^{ \frac {m log(y) } { logx } - n })}{log(x)} = log_x(1+log_x (y) - n)
[/math]
so
[math]
x^{n+log_x(1+x^{ m log_x(y) -n}= x^n*(1+\frac{y^m}{x^n}
[/math]
>>7809021
fixed last line:
[math]
x^{n + log_{x} ( 1 + x ^ { m log_{x}(y) - n})}= x ^ n*(1 + \frac{ y^m }{ x^n})
[/math]
Is /sci/ only math and physics?
http://www.strawpoll.me/6632918
Tell us your college major.
Materials Science and Metallurgy
>Not on the list
>>7808215
>http://www.strawpoll.me/6632918
>Computer science not on that list
I mean it probably wouldn't matter either they, they probably wouldn't figure out how to check the right box.
>>7808229
>they couldn't check the right box
And you are probably more or less blind
Good for maths and physics or not?
math no, physics maybe
>>7807881
I've pretty much done that all my uni years. how can this even have a fancy name, it's just common sense
>>7807881
Oh man, I remember this from middle and high school. Some classes actually forced us to take notes in this method.
Complete shit. Just take notes like a normal human being (everything in one section, spaced as you like as long as it's readable, no wasting time underlining or whatever).
What physical phenomenon limits the speed of light ?
>>7806677
>physica;
gralvity
>>7806677
the speed of causality.
>>7806677
Earth, fire, air, and water
Hey guys, I figured out how to calculate a decimal to octal however I stumbled upon an issue.
Once I have a number with no residual value I get zeroes which means I get the wrong idea I guess.
So can you guys explain it to me with a number that has no remainder, let's say 72?
>>7811006
nein
>>7811017
Please i'm fucked at my test tomorrow, it's the only thing I fail to understand
bump, I am curious too
pls explain
Just wondering whether or not I'm correct, it's bugging me:
1/3 + 2x/x-1 = 5/6 - 2/1-x
The answer I got was x=1, can anyone confirm?
>>7810901
yep, seems right.
>>7810927
it's 2x/x-1, the input was wrong, but damn that site is good, lemme try it :O