Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1912. page

The moon's gravitational pull is much weaker so no.

If they were almost touching, you'd weight about 5/6 of what you weight now, because the moon gravity is 1/6 of earths at its surface.

>>7812608
>Hello, /sci/, I just made my way here from /b/. I'm unsure yet of whether I want to be accepted into your ranks, but I really want you to like me and I hope we can be friends. I should warn you I'm a bit autistic, but little do I know, so does everyone else on this fucking board. Please like me. Sincerely, Austin

Fixed.

>>7812623
Excuse me, but this is math accepted by many mathematicians. This is a place of science, not /b/ trolls.

>>7812627

I said nothing of trolling. Merely a bland and wafer-thin humor crust around a rich, creamy core of insecurity nougat.

>>7812350
>I feel

Dropped. Feelings are discussed on tumblr.

>>7812351
Fuck off

>>7812356
No, for real. Nobody gives a fuck about what you feel. What argument do you have for it not being simply that some of them were immune or were not exposed?

>>7812302
>mi
>ft
discarded

100 mi^2 * 20 ft * 0.4 micrograms / mL

== 632000 kg

I'm in Law School, I forgot how to calculate that and I bought the wrong kind of bleach.

i try to masterbate but i dont have enoug to one and when i cum it isnt whole and my masterbate is fire

>>7811924
1.2 litre water.

When you are to calculate a complex integral.

>>7811831
See
>>7810206

>>7811831
You're integrating over a circle. If your fucking function is discontinuous in the circle, you use the residue theorem. If it is continuous over and in the whole circle, the answer is zero. Fucking open your book for once.

What class is this? Engineering?

I thought physicists weren't autistic.

>>7811093
Who says "electromotive force"?

I thought that hasn't been the case for decades now, it's just "EMF".

>>7811093

Dot is actually more accurate because it's the dot product.

>note that those 3 teams arent billionaires right now rigorously using this technology to advance jack crap

the results are so small, people are waving their hands off as merely normal interference

>>7810433
SPR is actually trying to market it as an alternative to ion drive for satellites

File: dark science.jpg (28KB, 335x513px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 335x513px

>>7810429
"There are other examples of observation conflicting with the 'laws of nature', such as galaxies rotating at speeds different from that predicted by the 'laws of nature'. In this case, rather than modifying the 'laws' to conform to the new observations, the theorists simply revised the universe to confirm to the laws by 'deducing' existence of dark matter and dark energy from the fact that the galaxy rotation would be 'violating a law of nature' unless the universe consisted predominately of dark matter and dark energy with properties and distribution as required to make observations conform to said laws." -- Hoo Nose

Or more direct, why do people believe people who can't comprehend basic language are common, when I never talked to one? Where are they? Is being stupid just believing propaganda and simplistic ideals, which is way more common?

What is stupidity?

>>7804806
>why do people believe people who can't comprehend basic language are common
because everyone pictures themselves better than anyone else, duh

>>7804810
So, "stupid people" are just a stereotype and actually only exist rarely?

Then back to my question, what is general stupidity and how did you encounter it

>>7802513
Depression affects the brain on a neurological level, and can be physiologically diagnosed this way. It is thus incontrovertibly real.

>>7802513
To give you perspective on how shitty depression diagnoses are. I was a whiny bitch on high and cut myself because my gf broke up with me. I went to therapist. Here is the extent of how she made my diagnosis. She pulled up a list of depession symptoms and made me check off the things I was experiencing. I checked like more than 5 or something and she told me to go to a prescription for some medicine. I was fucking diagnosed by what was basically a buzzfeed quiz. I feel like most people diagnosed don't even have depression based on my experience.

>>7802529
My fucking English failed me there.

nice blog faggot

Then why did you take the class?

>>7812684
Mandatory.

>>7812655
...do they not even bother talking about the Cold War in schools any more?

>>7812667
...do they not even bother talking in schools any more?

>>7812655
>They don't shill for nuclear power
>They're bad!

Can you give a concrete example of what your RVs are? Also, I thought you couldn't have your dependent RV be continuous in logistic regression?

>>7812506

Not sure about RV, but the dependent variable is a binary outcome (Not using/Using a car), and apart from covariates, the two independent variables are strength of environmental attitudes (scale treated as continuous) and time since moving home (months). Both are independent predictors, and an interaction effect is significant.

>>7812535
Alright, I'm not sure exactly how to do it, but according to http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/seminars/interaction_sem/interaction_sem.htm, it seems like you can indeed plot interaction against the values of the covariate (plot at roughly 1 third down the page). Apparently you first need to decide exactly in which way you want to model interaction: in their example, they use difference of differences, but they mention using ratio of odds ratios in a table a bit above that. I guess unless you have some kind of insight about which one to use for your particular problem, you should try them all and picking the one that looks best compared to what you're trying to show.

I can't help much more: I'm decent at probability but I haven't done any statistics for almost a decade so I tend to just use cookbooks.

Are you implying that [math]\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y}=\sqrt{x+y}[/math]?

>>7812176
wait why doesn't the latex work

>>7812162
No, you can't break up sums in a radical.

For example, [math]16=\sqrt{256}=\sqrt{64+64+64+64} \neq \sqrt{64}+\sqrt{64}+\sqrt{64}+\sqrt{64}=8*4=32[/math]

>>7811955

Well, consider what the Tarski-Vaught criterion implies.
Problems there?

Here's an elementary thing I like:

Prove that [math](\mathbb{N}, +, \cdot)[/math] is a definable substructure of [math](\mathbb{Z}, +, \cdot)[/math].

>>7811955
Where is this taken from?