Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1533. page

sry that I ENJOY LIFE rather be a no life reading all these geek shit XD

>>8207229
Amazing insights OP

>>8207830
DUDE WEED LMAO

>>8206884
Is this topic the only thing you come to /sci/ for?

Because there are already studies showing differences in intelligence between races

Also because there aren't many people who will pay them to do so, and academia is not some magical holy grail of objectivity

Because it creates political friction and it's discussion is of no benefit - and really only relevant to Gorilla posting anons with superiority issues and his real life equivalents

....

>>8208169
No

ask a doctor, not some neckbeard

>>8207488
The second law of thermodynamics requires a system to be in thermodynamic equilibrium. Strictly, probably nothing in our world is ever in proper equilibrium. The example you mentioned (bringing two objects together and looking at t=x nanoseconds) is definitely not an equilibrium situation. Also the entropy increase in the second law, is also obviously referring to timescales in which a system reaches equilibrium..

>>8207507
So could I say that is the system is at two points in time at an equilibrium down to planck lenghts, which is even more unlikely but still not impossible, and between those two points my high energy particles travel to the hotter body and vice versa, that the law was violated?

This will obviously never happen on the scale of the universe and within the lifespan of the universe, but just as a thought experiment.

Or is the planck length completely meaningless in that regard and a system can actually never be at equilibrium because even sub planck lengths of difference would mean its not?

It's changed somewhat because of the accelerating expansion of the universe, but yes it is _"_"_possible_"_"_ for entropy to only decrease starting tomorrow

>>>/sqt/

>>8207200
How the fuck am I supposed to filter out stupid shit like this?!

>>8207206
You can't. The best you can do is to no be autistic and get triggered by these threads.

>>8206717
/sci/ is slow, threads normally exist for a day w/o bumping before falling of the end of the board. Also, that's >>8206709 p-low res for a wallpaper.

khanacademy.org

>>8206617
Classical mechanics is just symplectic geometry on a cotangent bundle.
Special relativity is just Riemannian geometry with a metric of signature (1,3).
Babby QM is just projective unitary representations of Lie groups and algebras.

Congratulations, now you're ready to start with Folland's "Quantum Field Theory - A Tourist Guide for Mathematicians".

Youtube

>>8206591
my thoughts are that you're a fag!!!!!! and a retard!!!!!!, go away, do your summer assignments

if you need help with your homework find a tutor or work harder

gtfo

File: image.jpg (75KB, 500x184px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 500x184px

>>8206602
I don't want any homework help, I'm just sick of shitpost of /sci. Think about it, wouldn't it better to have a Math board?

>>8206591

OP, this board is only good for Math.

Hardly anyone on this board seems to understand science or have any significant level of scientific understanding.

This board should just be called 'Formal Logic and Shitposting' (FLS).

>>8206583
dark matter absorbs light
so it means,
the potential energy wich is it absorbed in it,it is the same as it could emits in form of heat

>>8206583
to get close to dark matter you need to travel at light speed in the deep space
so you will become light and get absorbed by it and die

>>8206583
Use a pokeball.

File: image.jpg (194KB, 830x1170px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 830x1170px

Found a weird picture on the Internet

>>8206572
hmmm i wonder what this thread will turn into?

>>8206570

>So are we just going to keep pretending there isn't a MAJOR problem of transitionary forms?

There isn't.

>Since the 1960s, evolutionists have been promising that "tomorrow" we'll find transitionary forms, and they still aren't there.

They haven't.

OP, it's a wonderfully fortunate thing that we have any fossils all.

For a carcass to fossilize it must avoid being consumed or decomposing, before being rapidly buried.

It then must avoid erosion.

It's very rare in nature for this to happen, therefore fossils are actually quite rare despite being seemingly abundant.

However, we do not require a single fossil to confirm evolution; the genetic information of living animals alone provides significant evidence.

>>8206329

I don't think they reject the existence of a disease, but they reject the way in which psychiatric disorders are categorized.

There's a lack of study on the mechanics of the human brain. As soon as we can learn more about the human brain a more found science can be established.

Primary Counter Arguments

1. Intentional Misinformation
- Chemical imbalance is a hypothesis, not a working theory; never tested
- There is no data to support automatic lifelong diagnosis
- Less than 10% diagnosed agree, and most of those are non-delusional based diagnosis
- Genetics can at most account for only 13% diagnosed; prelimiary error % is high in a new science
- FMRIs have not been scientifcally proven to accurately diagnosis psychiatric 'diseases'
- The Disease Model of Behavior has not been proven and has obvious holes in it's reasoning
- Bulverism and Hyperbolic Discounting of Client Research, Testimony and Reasoning
- Overdiagnosis is serious issue tied to demand, control, obediance and personal incredulity

2.) Issues with Fallacies in the Diagnostic/Stigma Process
- Appeal to Stone
- Bulverism
- Argument from Report/Assertion
- Argument Circular Reporting
- Argument from Ignorance/Silence
- False Dilemma
- False Attribution Error
- Cluster Illusion
- Hyperbolic Discounting
- Appeal to Probability [False Occam's Razor]
- Hasty Generalization
- Poisoning the Well
- Shifting the Burden of Proof
- Personal Incredulity [False Occam's Razor]
- False Equivocation
- False Equivocation of Correlation and Causation
- Appeal to Motive
- Reductio ad Aburdem
- Appeal to Availability Heuristic
- Psychologists Fallacy
- Appeal to Commonality
- Appeal to Common Cause
- Ignoring/Ignorance of Common Cause
- Biased Sampling
- Circular Reasoning
- Begging the Question
- Conflation
- Cherry Picking
- Loaded Questions/Demands/Assertions
- Affirming the Consequent
- Denying the Antecedent

3.) Issues with Authoritive Psychological Effects of Diagnosticians
- Mindguard
- Cultural Hegemony
- Moral Panic
- In-group Narcissism/Out-group Bullying/Suspicion
- Expectation Bias
- Dunning Kruger Effect
- Margaret Mitchell Effect
- Escalation of Commitment
- Baseless Over-confidence
- Confabulation
- Scapegoating
- Victim Blaming
- Blame Shifting
- Fantasy Intuition + Machiavellianism
- Rejection of Counter-Evidence [Boomerang/Backlash Effect]
- Catch 22
- Procedural Pressure/Intertia
- Egocetric Determinism
- Time/Responce Pressure
- Appeal to Doxa [False Occam's Razor]
- Social Inference

4.) Issues with the Chemical Imbalance Hypothesis
- Chemical Reactions are reactions, not Primers [Primary causes/initiators]
- A lack of Aspirin isn't the Initial Cause of a Headache; Aspirin Deficiency is not a disease
- Sedatives and Stimulants do not Correct, they Damage and Distract
- There has been zero proof or even proposed tests for the Chemical Imbalance Hypothesis
- Double Blind Diagnosis suggest "Suspicion Backtracking"; not "Specific Pathological Disease"
- Overdiagnosis isn't being challenged, contested or tested [double blind]

5.) Issues with False Support by Clients
- Depedant Clients; Appeal to Fear; Learned Helplessness
- Self-defeating; Learned Helplessness
- Histrionic
- False Equivocation; Dangerous Existential Claims; Hyperbole
- Appeal to Doxa/Authority/Narrative [Shifting Responsibility]

>>8206277
Drink a lot of vinegar, ~ 1 quart. Your tongue is hooked up to your gastic tract, this is why blood sugar rises in response to artificial sweeteners. If you give it something the opposite of sweet, your blood sugar will go down.

File: 1466431773622.jpg (236KB, 960x724px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 960x724px

>>8206277
Can I ask why you would want to induce hypoglycemia?

>>8206293
>>8206277
there are people who have died drinking this much vinegar, ignore this poster's comment he's a troll

{ your vision is not upside down , all your senses are upside down }

>>8206201
Is your vision upside down in zero gravity?

They are. You sense of balance would say you were upside down because gravity would be pulling on your inner ear and your flesh the wrong way.
As for hearing, if you were weightless and blind, the phase difference in your ears would always tell you the direction regardless, but if you had an alarm clock on a shelf and a cat meowing on the floor, the cat would seem to be on the shelf, and the alarm on the floor.
Our senses work together to make a picture in our heads, but for adults, the picture comes first, and the senses just update it. Being upside down doesn't take away your ability to orient that picture with your senses.

>Does /sci/ realize that it is the dumb kid in school who would complain about learning something because they didn't know "when they would use it in real life"?

Actually, that's what the smart kids said.

The dumb kids were always the collectivists that worshiped authoritarian groupthink and could never grasp why empiricism outranked conjecture.

Popper won numerous awards and is universally considered to be a genius by philosophers and scientists alike.

If you state empiricism isn't the only thing we have, then you have to provide proof that something is better.

Chances are you're an anti-science liberal arts douche; some radicalist that decided to come here to scream against facts because they don't fit your egotistical worldview.

Fuck you and your ego.
Proof for everyone else is all that matters.
It's always been that way and always will be.
Always.
:D

>>8206140
Who you idiot?
You didn't link and there is more than one post in the thread.
If anyone here is not too bright, it has already been scientifically proven to be you.

File: 1466273830954.gif (2MB, 343x203px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 343x203px

>>8206144
You alright man? I deleted my post

You don't sound too bright.

Online courses are AIDS.

>>8205979
how so? do u disregard the possibility of learning something useful from an online course?

>>8205975
>signed up for robotics
>forgot about it
>signed up for theoretical xenobiology
>forgot about it
Just don't forget, anon. Good luck.