Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1100. page

>>8531687
Eh, it doesn't seem too bad. My dad is over 60 and he has trouble remembering things, but he's clearly still smart and can still learn. There's a big difference between mild senility like most experience and Alzheimer's.

>>8531687
I would guess it comes with age.
Say as a species we provide the best offspring naturally in our late teens to late 20s. As children we retarded because we're still learning life skills until we mature in our late teens onwards having those said skills to survive and find mates. We reproduce and our biological purpose is now fullfilled.
We get older and because we;re no longer needed to ensure the human race goes on, nature doesn't bother itself about how we end up dying. Our purpose is spent so no longer need the cognitive ability needed to survive against predators and rivals to breed. We get sluggish in them and hence because retarded again.
That simple. The species gets what it needs out of the individual and then abandons them to go senile and croak.

>>8531723
but a better question is why we have to die anyway if we exclude overpopulation issues?
If I'm not mistaken we only break down and age badly because our cells lose their ability to replicate or mend themselves over time with age. So if science provided a way to ensure those cells always replicated perfectly each time, would we never die of old age?

Neuroscience
For M.D you just need to memorize

General medicine and dental medicine are two of the least intellectually demanding branches of medicine, next to psychiatry, so neuroscience wins by default.

>>8531681
Why are doctors so praised for their shitty title?

>>8531516
>musk does crack
So ?

It's just cocaine

>>8531516
>everything i dislike is degenerate
>t. OP
>>>/pol/

>>8531340
how to spot someone who never had sex in his life: the post

>not making assumptions based on context

>>8531342
This has nothing to do with the fact I am a virgin.

>>8531151
15

NaN

>>8531151
Easy shit 100

>>8531147
If they are the same concentration, then yes.

>>8531147
Practical solution, mix and check pH, adjust pH to 7 with vinegar and sodium bicarbonate

>>8531167
And since it generates so much heat, I don't even have to boil it

>>8531171
But the pasta would taste awful

>>8530728
If anybody knew it wouldn't be a conjecture

>>8530728
By analyzing many similar functions but which are much easier to prove.

Maybe start with the hypothesis that the will eventually reach 1 and then build up from that and then see what we find.

Then after studying all these trivial functions we need to make a theory out of them that allows us to analyze them and then go back to the collatz conjecture.

>>8530728

This is the incompleteness theorem in motion.

Clearly this is more than a conjecture, and I would bet all of my fortune that it is actually true, yet it is so random and nonsensical that it probably isn't in the realm of things that are provable.

>>8530534
>massless particles must propagate at c
Lrn2vacuum fgt pls

>>8530534
c is the speed of a massless particle specifically in vacuum (different then the speed of a massless particle in a non-vacuous medium) you dense twat.

>>8530540
>>8530538
So photons really propagates at speeds lower than c? Why does that happen? I mean microscopically why is the photon deaccelerated?

>>8529490
More like:
>I can deny macroevolution but I'd look way too dumb if also I denied microevolution

There is strong evidence of macro-evolution. For example we use it to describe the blow holes of whales or the wings of bats.

There is also evidence of the eye forming independently 50 some odd times from primitive eye-spots.

Why is everyone dumb?

why does this board have such a hard on for killing and death?

>>8526382
Thinking about death is therapeutic.

By pondering the vast nothingness of death, you can find solace in living an unfulfilling life.

By being smart enough to know how to trade stocks in an automated fashion and sitting around while your autism machine learning checks roll in

>learning meme maths

>knot theory
Can't math use non-sexual words? HOMOmorphism, ANALysis, KNOT theory.

I'm a mentally 12 year old, in the body of a 16 year old who is 27 years old.
Feels bad man.

How do I get into combinatorics. For some reason I don't get it.

>>8534269
[math]4^{x-1} = e^{x-1*ln(4)}[/math]
[math]2^{1+2x} = e^{1+2x*ln(4)}[/math]
Can't this help ?

turn 4 to 2, relate what you get to the other base 2 value, you get a + 3*8*a = 50

( with a = 2^(2x-2) )

which must equal to 2 then x = 3/2

>>8534298
But how do you come up with ln (2) in the fourth step? And why do you multiply it with those things in parentheses? The answer is 3/2 by the way as the other anon pointed out. I also don't get ln50.

"Engineering" that does not belong to the following categories is comedy gold-tier meme:
>Mechanical engineering
>Electrical engineering
>Computer engineering
>Optical engineering
>Acoustic engineering
>Telecom engineering

I don't hate them, really I don't even have a problem with their dicksucking habits

>>8531905
>Nuclear not on the list
Sure thing

>>8534234
>clearly religion offers a better answer
nobody really knows how reality was created dipshit

File: Alighieri.jpg (25KB, 240x317px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 240x317px

>>8534239

Take DMT friends. You'll understand then.

The molecule is a coded message from something significant. Almost everyone from the tribes in the amazon to urban businessmen see the same shit when they take it. That's not a coincidence.

File: Capture.png (191KB, 700x374px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 700x374px

What on earth does this say? I cannot read this writing to save 5 lives and a bucket of fish.

>>8534077
Are you the student or the grader?
Both of them have painful penmanship.

I'm guessing student-kun thought that writing T in standard matrix form is sufficient to prove that it is linear. Which is technically correct, but probably not what sensei-chan had in mind when setting the question, given that that's what (ii)(b) appears to be for.

For full marks student-kun would have to demonstrate that the property in (i) holds for the map T.

t. neither a teacher nor a student

>>8534114
In this case the same person wrote both the solutions and the marks. They're the ideal solutions to past papers. I agree with what you said about showing the the property holds. I don't get why this is a solution. But also don't even know wtf it says. Do you have any idea?