What is beauty to you, /lit/?
Do you ever encounter beauty in your reading?
>What is beauty to you, /lit/?
bussy
>Do you ever encounter beauty in your reading?
no :(
>>7834097
beauty is looking at a girl sleeping on my bed with my cum dried on her face.
So no, I don't encounter it in literature very often. I mostly read to appear intelligent, picking up quotes by famous authors and ancient wise men to drop on people in debate IRL. America's amazing like that, even in the lower echelons of academia people actually think you are intelligent if you can cite shit you've read offhand because nobody reads books here.
something that doesn't make sense in the logical world, not nonsensical but indescribable
yes
How do you rank the Greeks? Who is your Hellenic homeboy?
>>7832890
>that pic
Are we approaching the age when we'll be speaking exclusively through dank maymays?
>>7832890
Fuck that picture has me in tears
>>7832890
>Implying sophists weren't BTFO by Plato
There's nothing to be proud of when what you do becomes a synonym for fallacies and tricks three thousand years later.
I can help you with the german Literature. Eg for reading Kafka, Nietzsche, Freud etc..
pic unrelated.
What is some easy literature for a learner to start off with?
What is the German equivalent of Camus e.g.?
>>7832449
I´d suggest you Poems by Friedrich G-ttlieb Klopstock. Otherwise maybe something by Erich Kästner. We could skype and you just could ask about difficult sentences or stuff like that. I am not a teacher though, so I don´t really know if Klopstockis appropriate.
Are there any good /lit/-esque German literature forums?
has anyone actually read this shit?
literally nothing happens
>>7830398
>literally nothing happens
1. false
2. what's your point?
I swear i've seen this exact thread before
what's your game, op
>reading for plot
Someone on this very board is going to be a famous author in their lifetime.
Make it happen.
>>7830373
:,(
nice to hear
depends how you define "famous author"
If you became a world known author and someone discovered all your 4chan posts, would be you fucked?
>>7830237
Nooooope. They are EBIG
>>7830237
good thing I only shitpost so i can say i was only making fun of the community
hank green
baby shoos never worn
>>7830237
No because they are relatively tame compared to my fiction.
I'm considering acquiring a meditation habit. Which books will help me get started?
>>7825668
Mindfulness in plain english
>>7825672
Found it, thanks. Seems applicable for non-Buddhists as well, right?
>>7825718
Yes. It is made for all people.
What book holds the dearest memories for you /lit/fags? Mine is pic related.
>inb4 underage fag
>>7835474
Proud to be redpilled
probably one of the best children's books tbqh
if we're going to have literal threads about literal children's books, i'd rather it this than artemis fowl or goosebumps. yuck.
The Cay
Any graphic novel suggestion ?
Really ask /co/, but I like most stuff by Warren Ellis, Transmetropolitan by him and Sandman by Neil Gaiman being my favourites.
Maus, fun home
Honest opinion: Are audiobooks superior to print? Can a person retain the same information from hearing the words as they would reading?
I want to hear the pages turn and smell that book smell, you know what I mean
Socrates and those other greek faggots would have preferred audiobooks, reading text is vulgar shit for scribes
Also: does the brain retain information if a person is doing something while listening to an audiobook? What if the person sleeps while listening?
But he shouldn't be divulged nor widely read, and here is why.
I was listening to the fifth chapter of the Gay Science, entitled "We the fearless ones", in which Nietzsche discusses the problem of truth.
https://librivox.org/the-joyful-wisdom-by-friedrich-nietzsche/
He concludes that truth can be just as valuable as falsehood, that both have "equal rights", so to speak. What really matters is what is more useful to life, and this both can be. The will to truth, or the conviction that truth is always better than falsehood, is merely the result of us believing our own lies, called morals. His discussion of epistemology as a moral issue is simply brilliant. But why morality if there's none of it in nature and the world? Why silly, because of the *other* world! Hence religion and philosophies like that of Plato.
Notice that he doesn't say, like the vulgar relativist, that there is no truth. No, truth does exist. It's just that it's not always productive of the most positive results.
(From this point forward, not necessarily Nietzsche's opinions.)
This knowledge, however, this wisdom, that truth is not always preferable to falsehood, should be kept away and hidden from the masses. This is because a plebeian-type mentality will always interpret this in a negative sense conducive to nihilism, providing fertile soil for destructive ideologies such as liberalism and Marxism.
Religion and mythology fulfill this important role of enforcing truth-telling to the masses. What science is to the more clever individual, religion is to the plebeian: namely telling them that truth is the most important thing in the world. But there is still a higher type of person, let’s call him patrician, who asks, with Pilate: what is truth? But this wisdom is not for the lower man. Hence why I think readers of Nietzsche shouldn't advocate too strongly for enlightenment, or if they do, only to the few. The lie of religion has this one utility, to prevent the mass-man from falling prey to destructive nihilism and manipulation by the enemies of the higher man. And since the patrician has fully abandoned the conviction that truth is the most important thing, I think it's perfectly valid for him to utilize mystification as a means of keeping the plebeian from doing harm to himself and others. (Even Voltaire thought so! Hence my issue with atheists quoting him in their advocacy for mass atheism, but I digress.) Secularism is already a sufficient solution to neutralize the more negative effects that religion can have in public life. Laugh at religion all you want, but to your peers; not publicly, not in the marketplace.
LT;DR Nietzsche is cool, just not for plebs.
>>7831786
>he shouldn't be divulged nor widely read
u 100 years late m8
>>7831786
>But he shouldn't be divulged nor widely read, and here is why.
He himself said that only the elite would truly comprehend his message.
So he declared himself to be elitist, that's why the Marx-Engels writings were criticized in some of his works.
>>7831786
>This knowledge, however, this wisdom, that truth is not always preferable to falsehood, should be kept away and hidden from the masses.
While I agree, you did just very clearly outline all of this on a public imageboard... not really following your own words there are you?
Just read The Catcher in the Rye.
I didn't like it, but neither did I hate it. I just got the feeling that Holden was his own times teenage edgelord, typically complaining about everything he could.
I think that it may have been a good book at the time of its writing, but that you can't gain anything from it reading in today.
Thoughts about the book?
>>7831686
It was never a good back.
>>7831686
>. I just got the feeling that Holden was his own times teenage edgelord
That is the point, though.
The book perfectly captures the post-war life of a parentless (not really since his parents are alive, but they are absent nonetheless), misguided, tormented by death kid who can't let go of his childhood.
Read it again.
>>7831692
Contrarian pleb, please go.
>>7831704
Now that you point that out, I can see the point.
Still, none of us, who have been raised in 1st world countries, can really see through Holden's eyes. The book has lived its course, and you cant really gain anything but historical value from it. I really don't understand those people ho say it was the most important book they have ever read.
How is it?
>>7825555
I'm 50 pages in. So far it's been vague and violent. I'm sure it's good. Read it you cock sucking nigger loving jew cunt
its ok but sort of a meme around here
i can get why some people would like it, but the only reason /lit/ posters like it is is because it's SUPER GORY DUUUDE and everyone who has just come from /tv/ or /v/ wants to read something simple they can understand while being entertained by violence
imo suttree is better
>>7825578
What about the border trilogy. I got suttree not to long ago used. The copies beat to shit
post authors that you agree with politically
>inb4 butthurt
>>7821030
i'm not hurt, i'm just very disappointed in you
oi mateys
looking for outdoorsy stuff, man against elements etc m-muh manly things
so far i've read into le wild and thinking about reading krakauers other books, as well as jack london
also is it worth reading about theodore roosevelts life, seems like the sort of rustic and old timey wimey theme i'm looking for
>>7835339
>oi mateys
>m-muh
>le
Kill yourself
>>7835341
>timey wimey
Kill yourself