Which books should I read so I can be snobby in front of people that haven't read them.
None.
You don't really have to read them anyway.
>>8188529
the meme trilogy
>"and but so"
Why are you people memeing this phrase when it's obviously part of a 'chapter' meant to be retarded?
Memes don't need a reason
>>8188510
There's one thing and one thing only that the mods could do to immensely improve the board, instantly, overnight, and that's facilitate more threads about David Foster Wallace. Create them, nurture the ones that exist, guide the discussions, and make sure they stay on track. If we're here to discuss literature, ultimately, we are here to discuss David Foster Wallace. There is no way for a person to grasp the full implications of Infinite Jest and not realize this. We're talking about the smartest man who ever lived. You must realize this. It's not a joke anymore. We're seeing the world degenerate further and further into chaos, and we're standing by and watching it happen. You want to fix this board? You want to fix the world? You want to fix your life? You need only take one step: read Infinite Jest. There is no substitute for hard work, and that's what Wallace requires of you if you are to understand him. If you are to understand not just him, but the world. We're not talking about escapist literature, fan fiction, genre nonsense. We're talking about saving our lives. We're talking about meditating on God. We're talking about communing with the primary presence. This is not an issue to be treated lightly.
>>8188510
It's obviously part of a book that's meant to be retarded.
GET TO THE FUCKING POINT ALREADY
>>8188472
>reading Lolita for a quick wank
>>8188472
>I pray, Vladimir, or Nabokov if you prefer it I venture, move now and steady to the wished point and pin-point it later without so much wordiness.
>>8188472
>reading for plot
Is this a good short story
http://pastebin.com/KuxTiZ94
>>8188397
No: it's edgy and blandly written.
>>8188441
edgy is not actually a criticism
what you mean is that edgy, but badly written and void of value
>>8188445
yes it is you dummy
>one of the most famous authors of all time
>worth only 1.4 million
Jesus christ Hemingway, really?
get the fuck out of here with this furry garbage
>>8188341
hemmingway*
That's not corrected for inflation though.
>Tolstoy
>Dostoyevsky
>Nabakov
Why do Russian authors write using french so much? I speak french fluently so it's not a problem for me but I imagine others get irritated by it
french was a lingua franca in Russia among the nobility and that kinda people. they thought it was prestigious. it's like when english people jack off to latin.
Hatred of their own, inferior barbarian culture.
>>8188297
Noblesse oblige.
La Noblesse russe était éduquée en Français et, tu peux le lire dans "La Guerre et la Paix", certains nobles avaient même un peu de mal avec le russe.
Nabokov, lui-même issu d'une famille d'aristocrates, avait d'ailleurs apprit le français quand il n’était qu'un enfant.
My favorite authors are Thomas Pynchon and David Foster Wallace.
How much does this bother the quasi intellectual charlatans and their contrarian pursuits of high brow academia here?
quite a bit because you didn't mention Joyce, who is part of the sacred meme trilogy, forming a consubstantial holy trinity.
I learned recently about a video-game term that teenagers these days throw around: "overpowered," or "OP" for short. If a character type in a competitive video game is inordinately more powerful than the others, then it is "overpowered"; the game as a result is deemed "unbalanced," and fans will complain on forums that the developers have delivered to them a swift "slap in the face." It's an interesting metaphor. Life, of course, is no game, and it's a truism that it isn't fair. But every once in a while we get a striking reminder of how unevenly Mother Nature distributes her gifts. Take the literary world for instance. By any measure, David Foster Wallace, the author of the acclaimed novel Infinite Jest, was overpowered. If he were a class in a role-playing game, then you wouldn't hear the end of the complaining. When it came to the writing of fiction, Wallace blew his competitors—historical and contemporary both—out of the water. To borrow another term from video gaming, it's fair to say that he "owned" them. When Infinite Jest hit book stores in February 1996, the title's two words were in the mouth of every serious reader in America; every living writer, however, was faced with a different pair of words: "Game Over."
>>8188281
There's one thing and one thing only that the mods could do to immensely improve the board, instantly, overnight, and that's facilitate more threads about David Foster Wallace. Create them, nurture the ones that exist, guide the discussions, and make sure they stay on track. If we're here to discuss literature, ultimately, we are here to discuss David Foster Wallace. There is no way for a person to grasp the full implications of Infinite Jest and not realize this. We're talking about the smartest man who ever lived. You must realize this. It's not a joke anymore. We're seeing the world degenerate further and further into chaos, and we're standing by and watching it happen. You want to fix this board? You want to fix the world? You want to fix your life? You need only take one step: read Infinite Jest. There is no substitute for hard work, and that's what Wallace requires of you if you are to understand him. If you are to understand not just him, but the world. We're not talking about escapist literature, fan fiction, genre nonsense. We're talking about saving our lives. We're talking about meditating on God. We're talking about communing with the primary presence. This is not an issue to be treated lightly.
Who are some writers that just acted retarded and got away with it?
>>8188165
My diary desu
zizek
pynchon
http://www.firstwefeelthenwefall.com/#player
Thoughts on this ladsrivverun is 2nd one thunderword in 4th
pic unrelated
>>8187993
>Finnegan's
>'
>>8188005
prob should jus delete the thread now desu
>>8188005
fpbp
>Nicholas Nickleby is so fucking boring
>read zero books for over a week
>1870+146
>still falling for the Dickens is good meme
Dickens is children's literature, has been treated as such for some time, and ought to be treated this way into perpetuity.
anon you've been stuck on the same book for almost a month
just read something else that you actually enjoy
>>8187975
he wrote some of the best prose in the english language. bleak house is one of the best books ever written. tolstoy thought david copperfield was the best novel ever written.
"The eroticization of the gaze is virtually coextensive with the ideology of the gendered body."
"The eroticization of praxis replays (in parodic form) the fantasy of linguistic transparency."
"The fiction of normative value(s) is virtually coextensive with the engendering of power/knowledge."
"The culture of desire is always already participating in the invention of pedagogical institutions."
http://writing-program.uchicago.edu/toys/randomsentence/write-sentence.htm
I don't know, but he talks like a fucking robot
Continental philosophy in a nutshell. Never forget Sokal.
>putting phenomenological jargon in there
Hey that's not fair. They were AGAINST the poststructuralists.
Lit, I actually want to read a book that I find compelling. Every time I pick something up I feel like I've already experienced the deeper emotions, and I get bored with it. I already experienced so much heavy thoughts and shit, I often feel like the people who are talking to me aren't presenting me any new ideas. The only thing that seems new to me anymore sometimes is the constant stream of useless trivial data that gets added to my memory. The only thing that seems to keep me from getting bored is music, art, and challenging philosophical questions. I've thought to myself multiple times, that if you feel bored, you probably just aren't asking yourself enough questions and don't have many interesting thoughts. I try to avoid that, so please help me find a good book.
also, if you support the idea of god and religion, cis white western culture, or are a sexist racist bitch who supports capitalism, please don't respond. I'm being serious, this board is tainted with you idiots.
>>8187927
My diary t b h
>>8187927
What do you read OP?
You could try uh, making a friend, getting a job, or picking up a new sport.
That, or visit r/iamverysmart.
>>8187927
Ez b8
Before you call me pleb, I just would like to take a minute and have a serious discussion about the importance of reading classical works in a post-modern era.
As a fan contemporary lit, including modernism and post-modernism, I find myself reluctant to read classic works such as those by Homer, Dante, or even Shakespeare for the simple reason that I believe the ideas, ideals, themes and concepts concerning their material is somewhat dated. Now, I'm not completely ignorant to the fact I may learn something or get anything in general of value from these texts, I'm willing to read them if we can discuss said literature.
Dealing with these texts as they were especially relevant to the time in which they were published and/or most popularly read/studied (that is to say they aren't NOT relevant now), it's easy to understand why they are important to literature and literary history. All I'm curious about is why it is still important to read them now, and despite its dated concepts/ideals will I extract anything worthwhile.
I ask these questions seriously, and I hate coming to /lit/ for a serious discussion because I won't get any serious/honest replies but kys and maymays.
>>8187772
Homer and Dante are historical memes
Shakespeare transcends all eras, read him and you'd know that you fucking pleb
because being an instrumentalist is the saddest fucking thing to be.
>>8187772
Because a rich enjoyment of a text isn't just in its reading but also in coming to explain an understanding of it, we've had traditions of literary interpretation for Homer dating back thousands of years while some random post-modern author you pick up will be lucky to have a couple of blogs talking about him.
Well, this might sound strange, but, I'm currently working on an audio play which ends with the main character writing a suicide note.
So, any tips on writing suicide notes? Actually, any kind of advice would help.
watch Krapp's Last Tape, read Last Letters from Montmartre, Psychosis 4:48 and Hamlet and King Lear.
It depends on your character's mental state and circumstance, but if he does it successfully I would avoid conspicuous despair. Make it, tonally, resolute.
There's currently a suicide note in 8ch's suicide board, I would recommend reading those. Pretty bitter though, I don't know if that's the tone you're looking for.
>>8187777
thanks for the fast reply, I forgot to mention that the main character is a war hero.
who chained them in the cave in the first place
>>8187679
They did. They chained themselves in the cave because they sought to minimize their suffering. Even today, when information and discussion is literally available to anybody, people are willfully ignorant or disregard the harsher realities and truths of life.
it's a metaphor
The muse of memes.