i know the veridct is out, but what's your guess? i'm watching abecedaire, and in letter "j", deleuze talks about nietzsche's "creation of the concept" of the jewish "priest" who declares that the spiritual is all that is of value.
here's a passage from the new stirner translation:
>anyone who lives for a great idea, a good cause, a doctrine, a system, a lofty calling, may not let any worldly desires, any self-seeming interests, arise in himself. here we have the concept of priestliness, or as it can also be called in its pedagogic activity, schoolmasterliness; because ideals act as schoolmasters over us. the clergyman is quite specifically called to live the idea and to work for the idea, the truly good cause..."
the more i read about the two, the harder it is to believe the people who think their thought is just superficially related. apparently there are documented instances of philosopher's inspired by stirner, but who never mentioned him in print (adorno, husserl, etc.) i don't think it's impossible that they just came to the same ideas, but i feel more and more like nietzsche must have read stirner or else been taught his ideas. would love to read a book on the subject.
btw - if it were true, i don't think that would cheapen nietzsche's "project" - his is a lot bigger than stirner's, and has many components that, even if he was following stirner, go a lot further (in certain respects.)
note on the translation - i think in general it's a little clearer but less fun, and the original wasn't unclear. wolfi could have at least left spook in with a note in the introduction that it means something like phantasm. and also, "bats in the belfry" is a an incredibly gay saying
>>9901063
Almost every german philosopher read or heard about him, they just tried not to mention him because nobody wanted to be related to Stirner.
I hope I am remembering this correctly, Safranski mentions that Nietzsche must have read him
Are these books well-written/worth reading? I liked the movie quite a bit, and I'd like some books that capture that cold war paranoia.
Which one(s) should I start with?
>>9901002
I believe that he wrote The Spy who came from the Cold before TTSS, so tru that out, and if you like ot, read that.
TTSS is probably the greatest spy novel of all time, so yes. I've never heard a bad thing about Le Carré as far spy novels are concerned.
>>9901002
They're like the Dadrock of books, so no
>Just bought a bunch of books at GCF Donation Centre
he he he. take that ye poor bastards. Just bought YOUR books
>>9900924
>he bought books from a donation center
>he didn't just steal them
the only way to survive in the world is to acquire as much of it as you can
Has it produced insights into math or language like it was hoped to?
Bertrand Russell may be the worst human being and the shittiest philosopher who ever lived on this planet.
>>9900932
/thread. This should have never been bumped.
>>9900932
Could you elaborate? Not OP, btw, just interested in Russel
Like "Yoohoo" or "humdrum."
Words that are two or more syllables long where every syllable rhymes.
I can't find a word database that is able to detect this.
Wabisabi
Racecar
POW, ami! O? Gad, ami! Go hang a salami, doc! Note; I dissent. A fast never prevents a fatness. I diet on cod. I’m a lasagna hog. I’m a dago! I’m a wop!
>>9900982
Not palindromes dude
>>9900966
thank you sir
>woke up on 1st of January this year
>was sick of my social life and milieu
>told myself I would talk to everyone in real life as if they have the following education as a minimum: high school knowledge, 4 semesters of physics, 5 of maths (including real analysis), 2 semesters each of chemistry and biology basic German and French skills, basic computer science, programming, Linux knowledge; and talking as if they've read and are intimately familiar with the entire works of Shakespeare, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, all major religious books, and at least 25 classic works and 30 philosophers (more flexible on the philosophy)
>i.e. what any reasonably educated 22 year old should know as a minimum, with exceptions for those serving in the military or other worthwhile adventures
>refused to acknowledge anyone's unfamiliarity with these basic topics (knew I was coming across as autistic)
>lost 90 % of my friends within 2 months
>slowly finding new ones and they're the best I've ever had
>women, unlike the men, like me more due to my haughty attitude
Never give up guys.
>>9900894
>woke up on 1st of January this year
first mistake
>>9900894
Do you realize that Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and Shakespeare do not fit your standards?
>>9900894
Your green text pasta needs work.
What are the best Homer translations/editions? I'd like to start reading the Iliad and The Odyssey
>>9900746
mine. I'm not letting you read it though :^)
Face it lads, this is the closest we have in our modern day to the cafe societies of the past. This is where intellects gather to discuss and nitpick one another's thoughts and ideas. Don't feel bad for coming on /lit/. Of course, use it in moderation, but it's truly one of the most sacred corners of the internet. Rejoice, lads!
>>9900734
is it the redditors/summer fags that are making all these gay threads about /lit/ being an important place for literature? who is doing it?
>>9900734
Whatever you say, cuck
>>9900734
>sacred corners of the internet
>consists mostly of /pol/-lite and shitposting about books people haven't actually taken the time to read
I've learned more in high school lit, and I'm American. The actual sacred corners of the internet are invite-only and none of us matter enough to be invited. Think slack channels for journalists, private critique groups, publishing industry forums. /lit/ pales in comparison, and is only worth coming to if you've got a superiority complex to feed.
Bugs.. was this board's peak and it'll only be downhill from there.
I was raised on the Dewey Decimal Classification, but got used to the Library of Congress at University. Something about the DDC that feels juvenile, while I've heard good critiques of LCC, such as overlapping categories (such as B and P) and the nonsense of starting the system with A (starting with Collections).
Anyway, what library classification do you think is best?
For the lazy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_classification
>>9900654
My university library uses UDC and I'm never looking back.
>>9900715
Oh shit! That looks very interesting. What university do you attend?
JORDAN
O
R
D
A
NJk he's shit
>>9900538
How so?
Not a fanboy but I think he has some interesting ideas on how you should live your life
If nothing else you can watch and go "huh that's neat"
I'd say that puts him above 99% youtubers
Decolonizing Dialetics - Prof. Ciccariello-Maher, Prof. Drexel University
Is it good?
How does it compare to the movies?
>>9900486
I mean, you could just read it.
http://www.goldenageofscifi.info/ebook/Who_Goes_There.pdf
Usually books are better, only exception to me being Heart of Darkness
>>9900519
For me, it's the opposite. Film is much better at atmosphere and emotion, which is what most stories focus on.
The absolute state of bookshelf tour videos on youtube. Is it really only teenage girls with YA or faggots with HP collections.
>>9900464
It's because only idiots have bookshelves nowadays. If I bought all the books I'd downloaded I'd have a 6000 USD+ debt and nowhere to store them
>>9900464
>The absolute state of bookshelf tour videos on youtube.
implying it was ever in a better state to begin with. this has always been bottom of the barrel pleb crap and always will be.
>>9900468
I have eight bookshelves in my house.
I have been learning French on and off for about a year now and i'm getting quite good at reading it, but I have a very poor understanding of the actual groundwork of French grammar and conjugation since I have exclusively used Duolingo (which I have completed).
Also general language learning thread I guess.
Can you read french works with duolingo alone?
try French for Reading by Sandberg
>>9900288
No, not enough vocabulary. It's a start. Follow up with an actual grammar book, anki and reading as much ss you can and you can be reading with medium dictionary use in a year. Faster if you get actual speaking practice and such
Best complete Shakespeare hardback edition? Is it the one by Oxford University Press?
>>9900193
Bloom hates Oxford edits for what it's worth.
The norton edition is good. It translates archaic words on the margins of the same line rather than at the bottom of the page, so you don't have to keep darting around when you're reading
>$90.
b-but Oxford is 20
The only reason I read physical books instead of on laptop is because of worry about my sight. And ereaders cause the same harm to the eyes as the normal tablet screen?
Come on, this "Shitndle" money-making trend needs to end. At least the literate guys shouldn't be stupid enough to fall for it.
I don't think so. I just use the first nook that came out
Always has worked well for me
>>9900165
I spend very many hours in front of both computer and tablet, and my eyes suffer no harm. If you do suffer, try installing a blue light filter software it could help. Ereaders should be easy for eyes by default.
>>9900165
I tried to read this book, forgot what its called I know the author is the same as from 1984. Anyways
Read it, didn't understand jack shit of what they were saying. realised it was filmed watched the movie then realised that I still didnt understand what they were saying and that this is part of the book. Really enjoyed though and owyea A clockwork orange.
Though I don't really get the title. Never bothered reading the book again.
Did really like the idea of this book/movie and certainly some elements will be seen back in our possibly near future. Owyea.. George Orwell.