Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 4785. page

If you put them in a sealed barrel of cosmoline they'll probably last until the sun explodes. Then some distant planet in a far solar system will get free guns in the mysterious cylinders raining from the sky.

3-3.5 years

A gun, if properly maintained, could last until the parts wear out. It could last literally forever if it's just being stored. Anything with wood might need that replaced after a couple hundred years though.

Ammo, I'm less sure about. Assuming it's sealed from the outside environment, and there's no moisture, it might last forever. I'm not sure how chemically stable modern powder is.

File: 1446291477954.jpg (20KB, 454x454px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 454x454px

Gums good
Bwm bad

>>28061097
>i rigorously clean them
>i take them to the range and make them go boom
>i occasionally use my nugget bold to stimulate my prostate

Could you be any more vague?

They're pretty cool
They make me smile
10/10 would guns again

Because we're cheap and get a good deal on M16s and M4s.

>tavor
>good
Pick one, kike.

>>28061086
>Why don't we join the 21st century and adopt a bullpup assault rifle?

Show the Pentagon and Congress some combination of metrics that proves that a bullpup rifle far outclasses today's service rifle and that the replacement program is worth the expense.

File: Patrick_hurr.gif (2MB, 425x319px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 425x319px

>>28061086
>and that the replacement program is worth the expense.
>implying the military and congress care if they have to hemorrhage money
how many replacement program prospects have they had just for shits and giggles? and how many times have they tried to get rid of the M9 because it isn't .45

>>28060947
They already have the equivalent of just the frame in development (or testing).

File: 2DF492C500000578-0-image-a-30_1446252124166.jpg (44KB, 634x429px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 634x429px

>>28060947
Would you rather be the highly armored & offensive domination of a tank while also being target #1 or would you rather be a ghost in green.

>>28060947
As walking tanks/line infantry, stupid as they're not much more infallible as regular infantry against heavy weapons

As CQB specialized shock troops, more viable as close quarters allow greater use of its enhanced strength, speed and defenses to quickly overwhelm infantry in a situation where heavy weapons are impractical to use

>>28060877
Ergonomics and Mass Production

>>28060877
Nothing

File: IS-2 Bovington.jpg (321KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 1920x1080px

>>28060877

Things they thought they were good at (such as Heavy Tanks) the Soviets did better.

>century arms
take a guess

>>28060770
>>28060763
so just get a PTR then?

The c308 uses a lot of ptr stuff. Might have to take a gamble.

>>28060739
rocket launchers in my shoulders
mecha looking aesthetic exterior
nipple flashlights

File: 1400880644813.jpg (225KB, 613x827px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 613x827px

>>28060739
>Bionic eyes (fuck myopia)
>Carbon-fiber skeletal reinforcement
>medical nanomachines.

>>28060739
>Enhanced lung capacity
>Enhanced hearing capability with no more EEEEEEE
>Sharper vision with better low light visibility

>>28060722
paper targets dont have a heat singature

>>28060722
I don't hunt, and if I did, I don't think I would need that big of a crutch to shoot a pig.

File: hue.jpg (35KB, 500x271px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 500x271px

>>28060731
>i actually chuckled at this
>mfw nearly 3 days with no sleep
>mfw im becoming delirious and slap happy

>>28060585
if you want aftermarket at all buy a 500/870 or 500/870 knockoff

if you want to buy a beater and leave it stock rias good for that

>>28060585
literally all of your questions have been answered in the multitude of reviews on that very gun.
They're good guns. The action is incredibly smooth. They're pretty much made of all steel, so they're durable as fuck, but also pretty heavy. They're basically a copy of the high standard flite king.

>>28060596
I don't need aftermarket stuff, I just wanted to know what was available. Just incase I come by some extra money.

The one my friend has he had to send back because it wouldn't cycle properly. Only complaint he has with it now is that it hates military surplus ammo.

Which one you buying? I own a PTR SC

>>28060556
Buy one with the paddle release from atlantic firearms, or wait until they're standard on all the models

>>28060541
do you seriously only get like 10 shots in each gun? what the fuck? You're going to be switching guns ever like 1-2 minutes.

top 10 guns & 80 shots probably.
or if you can spend the extra cash, maybe 13 guns & 110 shots.

All of them seem incredibly overpriced though, especially considering nothing is even automatic.

>>28060575
Auto weapons are illegal there plus ammunition is expensive as fuck hence the prices. They can charge that kind of cash because it's mainly stag parties who go along.

I wanted to stay under £100 so I'll probably go for the 10 guns 80 shots and my girlfriend can just do the girls' package.

I think they give you a brief on each gun before you fire it etc. so I think the whole thing lasts a few hours but it's probably my only chance to fire a gun in the near future.

>>28060590
well come over to murrica and you can shoot a hell of a lot more for your money. But the 10 guns 80 shots seems like a decent overall package if you wanted to choose one of them. I'm curious if the dragunov is actually a dragunov, and not just a PSL.

Fake power armour

>>28060491
A vibrating dragon dildo up your ass now fuck off back to /v/.
>>>/v/
Sage

>>28060503
No.

What exactly would it do at that depth? Would it be able to communicate? Would they need to develop new weapons (SLBM etc) that can handle that depth of the weapons we have now work?

Where in the world would you be able to operate at that depth?

>>28060472
depth charges cannot reach them

a depth sta missile can be launched at any depth, size granted

>>28060472
Another question could be "how would we fight them" if deployed by hostile nations.

>>28060431

About tree fiddy

>>28060431
Bout three fiddy

>>28060431
ill give you 200 bucks for all of em

It's a great rifle but in the end you will just find yourself wanting a 10/22.

Just get a 10/22 right off the bat.

File: image.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>28060353
Get a Ruger 10/22, the aftermarket is obscenely large. And yes, a .22 should ideally be your first rifle

>>28060353
more accurate than the 10/22
more reliable than the 10/22
and the mags are even cheaper than the 10/22
hell its even fucking cheaper than the 10/22

buy it.