Why don't more millennials own guns?
Dont know. I own 5 though
>>34122451
Lots of millennials own guns
You should rephrase your question to, "Why don't more urban/liberal millennials own guns?"
>>34122451
Probably due to expense, it takes some time to be financially stable enough to buy stuff like that. Im one of the youngest members of my gun club and Im turning 30 in a month.
Would a revolver work in space, or somewhere like Mars?
>>34122059
I don't see why not
No. Without the magnetic interfeterence layer or the ionosphere the cylinder would either spin freely and never stop or not spin enough depends on the manufacturer
Yes. The charcoal in gunpowder is an oxidizer, so any gun can fire in space.
Realistically /k/.
Would an Army of Droids akin to the Separatist Droid Army render Human involvement in war obsolete? I mean we still handle Logistics, Tactics, Strategy, and Battle Planning, but would humans no longer need to die to do the droids presence?
>>34121937
We would probably build them to a quality more reminiscent of destroyer droids or Super Battle Droids, but they would be major game changers potentially.
they would be more akin to Terminators for intelligence before we could rely on them in occupation roles. unless they are remote commanded or semi-controlled by a human commander.
That said, B1 battle droids were super cheap by star wars standards, like the cost of an IRL roomba, and if we assume that their exoskeleton is at least Level 3A, the US military may be willing to eat the cost of them being clinically retarded.
>>34121937
Sure, although until you can create actual sentience there would still be roles for humans. Infantry kill bots also wouldnt be humanoid, it would probably be swarms of 2 or 3 designs each optimised for a different roles.
>>34121996
>>34121937
>B1 battle droids were super cheap by star wars standards, like the cost of an IRL roomba
This, and they were shit out in the millions per month until the Republic (proto-Empire) started blasting the factories.
Also, before someone posts the AAT (the separatist hover tank) asking why a Droid tank needs Droids to operate, it's because it's a tank designed for organic operators, it's the Space T-90
What's the best truck gun, why is it the best, and why is it pic related?
Truck gun=small-ish, high ammo capacity, reliable and not a shotgun or a gay ass AR-15
>>34121844
>not a shotgun
Faggot.
Uzi
>>34121844
why do i want this?
Just curious. If so, for what reasons (as long as it isn't something immediatetly apparent that you SHOULDN'T pass it for, obviously)?
Bump
>>34121777
Nice trips OP but no I haven't.
Not sure how much this fits together but I worked at a Gander Mountain for a while and saw a good amount of people fail their background checks. A good chunk came back and it would be for some really stupid shit. The younger/ more ghetto kids would have it for domestic violence or restraining orders.
This big bear weighing 1600 pounds and is 12 foot tall is charging at you, starting from 200m away
you can choose any weapon that is possible for you to carry and shoot while standing, you can't take explosives or stuff of the likes, with your weapon you have 5 bullets to kill that thing before it mauls you to pieces
what do you choose?
>>34121053
What I always carry in the MT ranges, a Mossberg 590 with Brenneke black magic magnum rounds. Want a 338 mag eventually but for now this will do.
>>34121053
.45
>>34121053
.22 will turn its brains to jelly
What kind of losses would the US incur if this was the end goal?
Say the UK has one weeks notice before the attack occurs.
>>34121030
Minimal. Britshits are cucks and the USA can choose to fund all the pakis as they usually do.
>>34121030
>Say the UK has one weeks notice before the attack occurs.
Enough time to get the Vanguards into position and level the Boston-Washington Corridor and with it fifth of the US economy, then.
The UK can't beat the US of course but John Bull can give Uncle Sam a good hard kick in the shins at least.
>annexing the UK
Congrats, now you have a bunch of military aged Muslims as your citizens. And a fuckton of Muslim ghettos to add to your problems. Enjoy non-stop internal stability issues.
I'll start with some fresh OC
>>34121026
is that a silencer? thats illegal I hope that isnt yours
>>34121026
Dat baffle strike tho
>>34121086
While theyve had their shortcomings like with any other weapon created. Theyre still awesome funs to play with. What are yalls memories and experiences with mini's
>>34120904
If they were STANAG compatible i would definitely love them and own one buy now.
but there is literally no excuse for them to continue to keep the proprietary mag configuration.
There are alot of Ruger firearms I love and respect. But the mini-14 triggers my shit every time
This is a mod a fellow did with his john masen flahhider and bayo mount he drilled and tapped it for a different rifle sight post to screw in
how would you rate this gun
>>34120550
Basically an overly heavy CZ-75, which would be fine if it were chambered in 10mm which I have no doubt it could handle fine because of how overbuilt it is.
>>34120550
10/10
greatest ally creates greatest weapons
>>34120555
>not loving the non-existent recoil of a heavy ass 9mm
So I did it. Cancelled my cable and cancelled Netflix. Give me a bunch of /k/ approved jewtube/online video channels to check out.
>>34120035
InRange
Forgotten weapons
C&Rsenal
Hickok45
Nutnfancy
British muzzleloaders
Military arms channel
Iraqveteran8888
Cap and Ball
A bunch more i know I'm forgetting but those are the big ones.
>>34120067
Drop Nutnfancy and MAC from that list and you're good. TFB TV is alright sometimes, but hasn't been the same since Alex left.
lifesizepotato
chris bartocci
So are are gun laws in Washington or Colorado like?
The idea of shooting in nice cold snow and mild summers appeals to me more than the humid shit weather of Louisiana.
>>34119654
>WA
>gun laws
>9th circuit
>Seattle gun laws
>>34119654
>Washington or Colorado
pot head liberal shitholes on the path to Cali/Jew york tier laws
>>34119654
Stay on the east of WA and its all good
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x02g4-XT_VU
this video reminds me of a couple incindents that took place during WWI; first is a case of a Thunderbolt limping back to England when an FW-190 showed up, as I recall the german pilot flew to the "Jug's" side, showed the right heading for England, saluted and broke off.
The second case is of a damaged Finnish B-239 flown by captain Hans "Hasse" Wind limping back to base when a Yak came to his side, the Soviet pilot counted the 18 victory stripes on the vertical stabilizer, saluted and broke off, allowing "Hasse" to return home safely, "Hasse" would later become the second-hightest scoring Finnish fighter ace with 75 confirmed kills.
What other stories do my fellow /k/omrades have of similar encounters?
>>34119302
>that took place during WWI
*that took place during WWII
bump!
>>34119302
The P-47 incident happened to Bob Johnson, the first American to break Rickenbacker's kill score in WWII.
The FW-190 pilot actually unloaded into the P-47, then flew up next to it, seeing it turned into swiss cheese, seeing the rudder nearly destroyed, the engine having taken multiple hits. Looked wide-eyed at the plane that was still flying after taking as much punishment as a heavy bomber.
The german pilot then escorted Johnson back to the English Channel, saluted, and flew off.
Talk me out of buying a Sig p320.
>>34119137
just buy it youre gonna buy it so just buy it
It's a pretty nice weapon.
I have the compact. The full size seems nice but it's too thick to be a carry IMO
Which do you think is the better machine
The pak fa is cheaper, more agile and faster
The f35 is more advanced, has better avionics, better weapons.
The
>>34117738
One is in full production and already in use, and the other never will be. Kind of an apples/oranges comparison.
Why compared two aircraft not intended for the same task?
>>34117738
>The f35 is more advanced, has better avionics
Do you have anything to support that claim?