Is faith the only difference between animals and humans?
Is atheism a religion?
lmao what?
Dumb frogposter
Atheism is pessimism, hedonism, and selfishness.
If when you die there is an afterlife could you willing give up being your individual self?
Simply a thought experiment, that questions how much you need to be you verses letting go, and possibly becoming part of a multi-consciousness that no longer resembles your own individual free will.
Like a droplet of water you dilute into an ocean of consciousness that no longer allows individuality.
Could you let go?
a lot of NDEs "confirm" this is the case, as well as the tibetan book of the dead. if you're able to let go the instant the barrier between your mind and the Mind break down, and not instinctively grasp for corporeality, you will be liberated from death and rebirth.
idk man, I'd like to but I don't think I'd be able to
I don't believe anyone could honestly answer this question.
I don't think I'd be comfortable with that just yet. So if the hindus are right I'm not ready for Moksha and would get reincarnated.
What divides Eastern Europe and Western Europe?
>>394374
communism
currently? communism
before that? influence of imperial russia
in the middle ages? religion, and what one would call "west" reached far beyond its present day boundaries to "central" or eastern european countries today (i.e. bohemia, poland...)
Why did Hinduism revive in India and replace Buddhism? How did it differ from the pre Buddhist Hindism?
What was it about Hinduism that allowed it to survive the arrival of Monotheistic religions? (Islam, Christianity, Sikhism)
>>393999
It was more martially orientated than Jainism and Buddhism
I was just wondering, are there are any Hindu (or any other religion, really) deities who have four arms and are able to transform at will? I had an incredibly vivid dream where I met someone like this and they claimed they were a god and that I could come to them if I was ever in danger. I would love to know if there are any actual deities who fit this description.
>>394588
You are referring to Vishnu. This reminds me of a quote by Dr. Oppenheimer when the first Nuke was dropped.
https://youtu.be/lb13ynu3Iac
Vishnu takes him Multi-armed form and says, "I am become death, the destroyer of worlds"
Why is getting involved in a land war in Asia one of the classic blunders?
Too much land
>>393220
People underestimate how massive the land is and how massive the population of said land is. Also fuckhueg mountains everywhere leading to a random desert in the middle of the continent
>>393476
The Mongols seemed to fare pretty well.
ITT: Historical figures that were actually not such great people, contrary to popular belief. I'll start.
What does "great people" mean?
>>392578
more great than me for sure
Science is based on observation and empirical reasoning. You observe the world around you, you take notes about phenomenon and try to figure out ideas as why it might happen. Then you test your claims, record the results and to see if your ideas hold up: if the results turn out to be positive then your line of thinking probably was on the right track and if they turn out to be negative then you learn that said idea is probably incorrect but at least you know that said line was probably not the case and the data you did collect might be useful down the line. Then (in part to eliminate your own biases) you submit your results to evaluation and retesting to see if you did things correctly or not. If it turns out that you recorded a false positive you admit your mistake and continue to work at the evidence.
Religion is based around Faith. Faith is a conviction that one holds to be true in spite of all evidence (especially when said religion is the One True Faith). Anything in the world which contradicts said conviction is to be either ignored, covered up or dismissed as being a deception of some king.
These two methods of thinking are fundamentally incompatible. Eventually science will question an important tenants of religion as it has been doing for centuries. Science allowed human civilization to work out how to go from a situation where 90% of the population had to be peasant farmers and one in three children died in childbirth to one of unprecedented economic prosperity in a few centuries. Faith does not get you knowledge but it is a remarkably good way of staying wrong forever and never admitting it to anyone, even yourself.
>>391736
Science and faith are not in conflict—unless you want them to be. If someone places faith before truth, then they are stepping out of bounds. But if faith is what one has because something is true, and not the other way around, science becomes the One True Faith. This is another counter-intuitive feature of science: it is thoroughly empirical, built on observation and evidence, yet “empiricism” is not observation and evidence alone, but a view of things that is constructed from observed facts, and the whole enterprise of science requires at least the provisional belief that those constructions are true. On the one hand science requires faith, a faith that certain principles and models and bodies of knowledge are true. On the other hand, this faith is not blind, but based on evidence. It is justified faith.
Scientists build up faith in science’s concepts, principles, and conclusions through repeated practice or testing, and when this faith is challenged, they return again to examine the facts, to see if their faith is justified by them. This is what makes science an empirical enterprise, the fact that it ultimately grounds and justifies its faith by appeal to observable evidence.
The idea of an empirically-based faith is hard for many people to grasp, especially if they are used to thinking that “faith” is only a reason for believing something when you don’t have evidence. The term “faith” does have both connotations, meaning “belief” in some cases, but also “reason to believe” in others. Science has no use for that second kind of faith. But it is not true that a scientist “has no faith” in science: he has faith in it, but a faith that is grounded in empirical evidence and reasoning. By confusing the two notions of faith, common sense creates a false dichotomy between faith and empirical justification. Science unites them.
>>391736
Read Kuhn, then Lakatos, then Feyerabend.
>>391736
Religion is based around politics and identity.
>“In his lectures to young communists in Germany during the rise of Hitler and the Nazis, psychologist Wilhelm Reich theorized that the suppression of sexuality was essential to an authoritarian government. Without the imposition of antisexual morality, he believed, people would be free from shame and would trust their own sense of right and wrong… Perhaps if we were raised without shame and guilt about our desires, we might be freer people in more ways than simply the sexual.”
>When the infant physical affectional variable was combined with permitted pre-marital sexuality my prediction of peaceful or violent cultures rose to 100% of the 49 cultures where this information was available. Further, these cultures were matrilineal where 78% of the nine cultures that also had information on extramarital sexuality also permitted extramarital sexuality.
>The ultimate human spiritual-sexual state, however, can only be realized when the human female (whose brain is uniquely designed for the spiritual-sexual state) is completely free to express her sexual love according to her own terms which means multiple sexual relationships without fear of male reproach, control or violence. For this to occur the developing brain of the infant/child must be encoded and programmed with pleasure (affectional bonding) for the neural circuits to develop to make possible the spiritual-sexual state later in life. Unfortunately, just the opposite is happening in most human cultures of today where infant/day care centers, e.g., provide little or no affectional bonding with anyone.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/bulletin/article.html
People should feel shame & guilt about wanting to engage in behaviors that spread disease, ruin their sexual organs, and reduce their capacity for pair-bonding
It's that time of day again.
Certainly better than in modern day Zimbabwe, that's for sure.
>>397017
Grandfather was around during Rhodesia, said it was shit if you weren't white and Mugabe was just a fuck up.
>>397025
>Certainly better than in modern day Zimbabwe, that's for sure.
Bullshit. Bullshit thinking. Bullshit evidence. Bullshit argument. Supply your moral or political perspective which says what "better" is for a person or people, and then supply evidence to support your claim.
Be bold, be right, actually make a fucking argument you horrible cunt.
Ben Franklin in Video Games:
>Bumbling, absent minded, timidly overly polite, "jolly"
Ben Franklin in Television:
>Steely, restrained, reserved, tactful, arrogant
Which was it? Or was it both?
>>397030
He was a party animal who loved French babes, and he was also quite intelligent and politically as well as socially aware.
Not even Murrifat by the way.
>>397030
>Trusting the depiction of Asscreed, a game by Frog faggots which has misrepresented every period since the first game
>>397030
What games are you playing?
Why is he treated as a saint by Americans?
>>397000
Because Americans refuse to do research.
If they did, they would find he:
>gave weapons to Iran
>armed literal terrorists in South America
>armed literal terrorists in Afghanistan
>legalized abortion as governor of California
>signed the automatic weapons ban bill into acton
Quite anti-American of him.
>>397016
This desu
the Eternal Californian strikes again.
>>397000
Because we're engineered to be actually retarded.
Why? Why were my Irish ancestors so backwards and messed up?
They were seem as barely human by the rest if Europe at the time. What went wrong?
>>396947
>What went wrong?
Designated drinking streets
Also Celtic kuck blood
Look at Germany ;_;
>>396952
What does that mean?
Archaeologists claim carbon dating of ancient weapons found in Kessel proves Roman emperor led massacre of Germanic tribes on Dutch soil
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/11/julius-caesar-battlefield-unearthed-southern-netherlands-dutch-archaeologists
So wheres my reparations Italy?
>>396881
>emperor
based Caesar still delivering after thousands of years
Who were the greatest Trolls in history?
You could argue Socrates, but Diogenes probably trumps him, and then we have fellows like Luther and potentially you could even argue Jesus himself if you really wanted to take the religious route.
Kierkegaard
>>396392
Al Sharpton.
Cicero
What say you of Uncle Ho, /his/?
>>396108
He's a monster who persecuted political enemies as harshly as Stalin or Mao, but on a much smaller scale so it's not one of history's "great atrocities"
People call him a hero because he bloodied America's nose, but during the time between the Vietnam War and the division between North and South Vietnam, free travel was permitted between the two states and millions fled North Vietnam for good fucking reason.
>>396127
Go back to gangbanging in Southern California, Nguyen.
>>396137
I actually live in Arizona topkek