Why was this guy hated by everyone? He had the same views as John Paul II and Francis. He was also a better theologian than both of them.
He looks creepy.
The media unjustly blamed him for the sex scandals.
>He had the same views as John Paul II and Francis
No, he criticizes the theology of liberation.
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19840806_theology-liberation_en.html
He was immediately replaced by a liberation theologian jesuit.
>>499393
No, he was directly involved in cover ups during his earlier work.
>atheism
>intelligence resides in the brain
>the brain is a human organ
>DNA/Genetics determines the structure and function of human organs
>DNA/Genetics has nothing to do with intelligence
Either intelligence is a property of the soul, or it is a property of the physical body. If the former, God exists. If the latter, intelligence is determined by DNA.
QED.
The brain is developed in part as a result of DNA, but it's paths and formation are altered as a result of environment, use, habituation, etc. It is clear that the repeated use of aspects of the brain alter it's composition, see neuroplasticity. It is not entirely determined by genetics as a result.
>>499332
> My arm is a property of my physical body
> Out of nowhere, a rock falls and completely crush it
> "Surely this isn't caused by environmental factors but determined by my DNA"
Also, intelligence existing as a property of the soul, taking soul to be a metaphysical consciousness, does not necessitate the existence of God. All it necessitates is a metaphysical reality, the contents of that are unclear aside from a soul.
Why do you need a PhD, or even a Masters, to do historical research or even teach college classes on history?
Why are the standards so high for who gets to become a historian? There are people making lots of money with only bachelors in STEM fields, doing more than just the most entry-level STEM jobs, who remain in the field for life without needing more credentials. Though obviously you need to at least have a Masters to get some of the higher level engineering jobs.
Still, you really only need a Masters to get a high level engineering job, not a PhD.
So why are the standards to become a historian so incredibly high? If the STEM people can let people in the door with just a bachelors, why can't the humanities do the same?
Let people research and teach with a bachelor's, and if they want to teach at an elite university or be a part of the administration end of some archaeological dig or other form of historical research, then they would need a Masters or a PhD.
>>499214
Engineering is a higly technical job and most of its science was actually done in the industry Its an experimental endeavour buitd by people who were trying to achieve practical goals History is a field built by academics who rely on the academia to support and verify their research
STEAM jobs can be trained while in the middle of doing the job. They can be given simple tasks today while in mid-training. You can't do that with history.
>>499214
They're disenfranchising us, anon.
Philosophers suggest that humans can do more than simply exist. Philosophy encourages humans to do something with their life. It encourages action in life. To prove that this is possible, one can easily turn to the great figures of history who risked everything and worked painstakingly hard to make change as they saw fit. Is this not the perfect way to inspire one to make change?
Academia realizes this. They don't want people thinking for themselves when it comes to the world. They don't want people striving for change. As such, academia supports the sciences.
After all, what better way is there to discourage change than to say that humanity is a mere result of a cosmic accident and that humans are simply automatons who act on the impulses caused by chemicals in the brain? Then when one denies this, those who disagree with he/she can just say that such denial is hampering scientific progress and then ask for a peer review. This makes scientists unquestionable beings, who can never be wrong about their dull, literal outlook on life.
The Humanities are being killed so that questioning existence will be discouraged.
why bother calling this board history and "humanities" if all we're allowed to talk about is history and centuries dead philosophers?
who has been the most influential philosopher of the 21st century so far? I want to look into more modern philosophies and ways of thinking.
>>499109
Elliot Hulse is a bretty good philosopher.
His ideas are almost a blend of Transcendentalism, Classical Philosophy,small parts of Eastern Philosophy, and the streets. He also supports strength training for everybody, and runs a strength camp. His YouTube channel is dedicated to lifting advice, life advice, and philosophical speeches.
Beware though, he gets way too into some Eastern rituals.
https://www.youtube.com/user/elliottsaidwhat
>>499163
I was under the impression he was a meathead by the way /fit/ talks about him.
It's kind of too early to tell--we're only in the second decade of the century. Anyway, you don't find many philosophers with the same kind of stature as Kant or Hegel or Heidegger. Philosophy is mostly an academic industry these days, pretty insular and focused on very particular, esoteric 'problems' that are completely opaque and untranslatable for laymen.
If you're interested in current debates in philosophy, just subscribe to our look up any of the numerous publications that are being put out constantly.
The only theories of evolution you tend to hear about are Lamarck's, Haeckel's and Darwin's. Are there any other major theories of evolution? Are any of them remotely viable?
I understand a humanities board is really not the place for this question, but I posted it on /sci/ before and I just got stuff like furry porn in response. So I ask you, hoping your responses will be more informed or thoughtful.
>>499080
Evolution is a lie.
>>499080
the only problem with homo is that homos cannot reproduce, also shit dicking and disease
If war-chanting, religious hymnals and spiritual praises, and love songs...can have an effect on one's conscious or actions...why is it so hard to believe that hip-hop, gangster rap, rock music, and other forms of violent music, can drive a culture to commit crime? For example: the high crime rate of urban, black Detroit
In the same vein....if books, theaters, and philosophy can impact someone's conscious, why is it so hard to believe that violent video games or glorified action movies can negatively effect a player's or watchers apathy? For example, the Columbine shooters played DOOM almost religiously.
Discuss.
>>498859
Iirc fps such as call of duty fall into catharsis, relieving your feelings of anger and rage in a harmless environment and make you feel better about yourself, much like Greek tragedies.
Rap was a political voice for young impoverished blacks when it began, and as their lives involved encounters with crime it was naturally a part of the subject matter.
>>498859
AIN'T NOTHIN TO IT
The rest is empty with no brain but the clever nerd
The best emcee with no chain ya ever heard
How did the Finnish Empire collapse?
>>498685
The fucking what?
>>498701
The Finnish Empire
I think OP made it quite clear
>>498685
They beat each other to death with Nokia phones while drunk fighting over who got to fuck the prize reindeer.
Mosley
Loser
I enjoyed reading the greater Britain
good thread
how does this happen?
or are the numbers just inaccurate?
japan had 5 carriers with up to date aircraft
>>498453
>hey guys lets begin a war for a region that can only be reached and supplied by sea
>we have only one worthy ship, lets risk it in some irrelevant naval battle
>we have a badass ironclad and are against some shitty wooden schooner
>hmm, these waters seem really shallow and the enemy ship tries to get as close to the coast as possible, so obviously LETS RAM IT
Peru truly deserved the rape they received during the Pacific War.
alright atheists, riddle me this
if morality doesn't come from god, where does it come from?
from angus :DDD
Convenience.
>>498257
If it came from God it would mean that moral is subjective. Go away you silly relativist.
Thoughts? They are buzzfeed but with pop history and history relating to current events.
They enjoyed being compared to Buzzfeed and openly admit to being biased. Have used "right side of history"
They've had a couple of pretty interesting articles tho. Facebook comments cringey as hell.
>>498100
Never heard, but it sounds like I'll never have anything to do with them ever.
Is it another Cracked tier crap?
>HOLY FUCKING SHIT DID YOU KNOW THIS KING HAD A 9 INCH DICK
>>498135
Maybe. Cracked usually lies in their history articles.
Which nations were kindest to the Jews and gave them most rights? Cyrus the Great in ancient Persia, India gave Jews the right to vote, possibly Czechnya.
In Poland they could become nobility among other things.
>>498032
>Czechnya
I have le tricky hook stuck in my mouth
I'm bleeding
help
>>498043
Did what is now the Czech Republic have a fairly robust and healthy Jewish culture?
How do I find/give purpose to my life?
What philosophers talk in detail about this topic? I want to read more about it, what helped you?
>>498024
>What philosophers talk in detail about this topic?
The existentialists
>>498024
you posted that picture for a personal imaginative reason
>>498024
Please, go to /lit
Why was Hitler so bent on controlling all of Europe? Why did he think the Axis alliance would be able win the war? He already rebuilt Germany and tore the Versailles to shreds , couldn't he have focused on Germany?
All of Europe? He just wanted to beat France really badly and create lebensraum in the Soviet states. But things changed and got out of hand when Poland rejected him.
>>497980
He was convinced of two very important things.
One. The fact that the current borders of Germany were insufficient. The German people needed more land to live in and cultivate. He believed that a lack of arable land led to poverty and degeneracy for many Germans: if a man cannot even grow his own food, how can he be a proper citizen?
Two. He believed that communism, socialism and every ideology left-leaning was a pure manifestation of Jewish evilness. The USSR embodied this Jewish corruption and the only way for Germany and Nazism to know success was by exterminating all Jews and all Jewish creations, most prominently the USSR.
Nazi ideology depended on a war in the east. It was unavoidable without massive doctrinal changes.
>>497980
Pure autism and him being a shitty leader, both politically and militarily. Theres a reason a bunch of generals tried to assassinate him and his poster boy Rommel didnt like him at all.
He would have done ok for himselfand probably gone down in history as a arguably good leader if he didnt throw a shitfit about some irrelevant port in Poland.
Where to start with Rumi?
nowhere because he isn't good except for one (1) single rubai.
>>497843
Why is he painted like an Orthodox icon?
>>497850
no idea senpai