Give me the story on crimea
From Greece to Russia, its history seems really interesting, like some fringe territory on the outer rim of an empire.
>Random ancient steppe people like Scythians, Cimmerians and shit
>Greek colonies
>Cimmerian Kingdom
>Roman client
>Byzantine
>Hordes passing through like the Huns, Avars, Cums and shit, even some Goths with a special dialect
>These guys became the Crimean Tatars
>Genoese had some business there (Kaffa)
>Crimean Khanate
>Ottomans
>Russia wins it from Ottomans
>Bolsheviks take over Russia and append Crimea to Ukrainian SSR
>Commies fall and break up
>Degenerate Americans stage a coup in Kiev
>Pro-Russians revolt and call for Russian annexation
>>517653
You forgot to add that it's the last place where Goths as a thing existed [spoiler]Until late 18th century[/spoiler]
>>517653
Found the russian
>Claim your state is called Scotland, because it's inhabited by the Scots, who speak scottish
>Not even 5% of the people can speak scottish
Can someone explain this to me? Scottish language was the dominant language of the native people, before being just swept away by the english with the english language (today called scots dialect)
Are Scottish people aware they're at this point just England with a funny accent?
Pic 1 is a language map of Scotland in the 12th century
Pic 2 is a language map of Scotland in the 21th century
So what do you propose, that we rename it to northern England you fucking idiot?
They save face by calling the local variety Scots and claiming it's a different language.
Why does /his/ hate atheism?
Isn't it just the logical and scientific way to view the world?
Christians shitpost better.
>>516922
Every. Fucking. Day.
>>516922
but anon, atheists don't do the right thing
Why is it "the United States is" instead of "the United States are" in grammar?
I have an American friend that told me that it used to be the second one, but it changed after the Civil War as the US centralized, possibly with political motivation. Is this true?
Painting unrelated
They taught the same in my schoolbooks and I'm Dutch. Before the civil war the states were referred independently, you'd often find letters which said: we the states of New York, Massachussets, New Jersey etc. After the war it was referred as a single entity that was the federal goverment of the USA.
>>516524
Idunno about that, but these two always trigger me:
>THE Ukraine
>The Czech REPUBLIC
>>516524
I don't know about the whole political thing (could be, for all I know), but yeah, in antebellum writing, you normally see "these united States", " the various united States", and other such structures where the states in United States were understood in the plural.
Did the US lose the Vietnam War?
>>515842
Well they certainly didn't win it
>>515842
Answer me, "What was the Vietnam war" and you answer your own question.
Since the aim was to keep the South Vietnamese nation around, then yes.
inb4
>but we withdrew our support before it collapsed :^)
You don't win in vidya because you resign from the match before you're actually defeated by your opponent
Say something nice about the khmer rouge!!!!
>>515651
Their leadership had good french doctorates.
They gave your average semi-educated Westerner something to know about Cambodia aside from Angkor Wat.
They had a good approach to preventing overpopulation. If the same policies were applied to the most population and highest polluting nations, climate change would no longer be an issue!
How do Protestants interpret this (Greek interlinear)?
http://biblehub.com/interlinear/james/2-24.htm
Luther wanted to remove the entire Book of James because of this passage.
>>515609
I'm certainly no protestant, being buddhist, but I just read James 2 in KJV (yeah I know, but I'm used to it as a literary text), and the protestant argument that works are a handmaiden of faith but not necessary for salvation looks pretty stable. One who has faith will necessarily have works, and the works will be the praxis of the faith, but it is by faith alone blah blah.
Was Luther really that incompetent?
>>515632
So atheists can't do good works?
Luther wanted to remove a lot of books from the NT.
>Luther made an attempt to remove the books of Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation from the canon (notably, he perceived them to go against certain Protestant doctrines such as sola gratia and sola fide), but this was not generally accepted among his followers. However, these books are ordered last in the German-language Luther Bible to this day.[5]
>>515645
>So atheists can't do good works?
Neither can heathens or heretics IIRC. Or people you think are outside communion (depending).
What do you think has prevented southamerican republics from being worldwide relevant throughout their whole existence?
>>513213
bad economic policies
very strict hierarchical social castes based on race (european, mestizo, native...)
And in the case of Brazil: slavery and the fact that they ended up ruled by very unstable governments after they god rid of their emperor, which was actually quite an outstanding individual.
Complete reliance on agriculture and mining as only pillars of the economy.
Having a US backed coup every time you start doing things right
Did the Nazis stand a chance to win WW2?
>>513182
No. We have this thread a zillion times. Please look in the archives or something.
Yes, if the British joined them. Obviously they didn't though.
>>513182
>Nazis not being/acting like Nazis
>tfw babtized protestant
>tfw I agree with the (Russian-) Orthodox Church on almost everything
>tfw there's no Orthodox church near me and moving isn't an option right now
What do? Should I just convert to Catholicism and enter the Orthodox Church once I am able to move near one? There are some major things I disagree with in Catholicism (the infallibility of the Pope, for example) but it seems like the next best thing.
What are some other major differences (exept for obvious things)?
Orthodox church in Russia is pretty much owned by Putin, and by agreeing with them you agree with Russian policies then why not learn Russian and travel there?
Catholic popes are shills too, most of time.
You think long and hard about it, and stop yourself before you become another Orthodox tripfag
The Orthodox are culturally minor and xenophobic. Think carefully if you really want to get in on that stuff.
Is it ever appropriate to kill someone outside of self defense?
Are people who kill knowledgable of the fact that who they kill are human beings with lives and aspirations?
Why do we still war if the people in charge of doing so are aware of the fact they they are sending people to end people at the risk of death?
>>512773
I'd say that most people don't care,
I personally don't give two shits about any wars or casualties (as long as I can't see them to be fair).
I'd also say most people probably feel that the ends justify the means, and that is all the justification they need.
We all have a great deal of empathy, but some are better at ignoring it then others.
Its not and everybody knows it not so they have to invent justifications when needed
>>512773
>Is it ever appropriate to kill someone outside of self defense?
Sure, if it benefits a stupid woman who got knocked up. And most western society agrees with me.
What does /his/ think of The Man in the High Castle?
I haven't seen any of it, but the jist of it seems to be "plucky American underdogs being oppressed by mean old foreigner Nazis".
It strikes me this is kinda disingenuous, I really don't think America in the 30s/40s/50s would have had to have been forced to accept Nazism if the racism, anti-Communism and anti-Semitic/rich aspects were played up.
Nazis in most, if not all alternate history fiction are cartoonesque, comic book villains devoid of any human qualities who talk about gassing Jews and Hitler saluting every 5 minutes. There's even a trope describing this shit: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ThoseWackyNazis
And note, this is NOT a nazi apologist post. I feel very little sympathy towards them, but they weren't all Lex Luthors on steroids.
I mean, the things the FBI were doing under Hoover, Patton wanting to join up with the remnants of the SS to wipe out the USSR, widespread acceptance of the superiority of the white race, McCarthy.
>>512658
No, I understand. There's a tendency to "other" Hitler and the Nazis as just being "crazy" or "monsters", and I think that's a very dangerous thing to do since it denies the possibility that a human, just like you and I could be capable of what they did.
That said, really whacky Nazis can be fun when they obviously bear no relation to reality, like Iron Sky or Hellsing Ultimate or Wolfenstien.
What made the islamic reforms of wahhabism catch on so well?
>>512296
House of Saud
1916
1918
1940
1953
Take your pick
>>512296
The fall of the Ottomans
Thanks Britain!
ITT : Shitty /His/ Memes
I'll starts
>Soviets singlehandedly won WWII and no one can question their dominance
>Franco-Prussian war does not count as a France vs. Germany war
>Anglos are the cause of all the worlds problems and inferior inbred islanders who never actually fought a war and all of them think they dindu nuffin
>>510923
>History is written by the victor
>If one side has more people than the other it's automatically using human wave tactics
>>510923
>The ancient Egyptians were black
We waz kangs and kweems nigga
>>510923
>Islamic civilization collapsed when Mongols sacked Baghdad
This one is a favorite of Reddit. Its like the Ottoman empire and Mughals never existed
Was Nietzsche familiar with Orthodox theology? Seems like none of his criticisms of Christianity can be applied to Orthodox Christianity
Are you a shitposter or are you just devout and insistent on discussing Orthodoxy exclusively?
Why wouldn't they? It's still slave morality.
>>510547
Nietzsche saw slave morality as stemming from resentment, and master morality as stemming from love of life. So no.