ITT: underrated thinkers
/r/ the "fucking Normans get off my island" with Pepe superimposed over Hastings
>>530788
this isn't /r/
>>530788
Don't let him stab you else you'll turn into a girl!
>>530798
>polite requests cannot be made on a board dedicated to such material
It isn't the thread focus. The thread focus is memes.
What is the /his/ view of Napoleon?
As a British person I think he shouldn't have been denied free travel within the British isles (As he was when he was captured, due to worries about his cause gaining popular cause among the peasants and such), because given what he believed in I feel he should have conquered the British isles.
The world would be a better place had we not won the Napoleonic wars desu.
The thought of a Napoleonic Europe honestly gets me rock fucking solid
>>530696
Same desu
The defeat of Napoleon was a victory for reaction and Conservatiism, it set back the whole of the 19th century in terms of social progress and civil liberties.
>>530695
Greatest man in the last millennium. No one better since.
Reminder that the yanks let the Jap Unit 731 got away with medical experimentation warcrimes while the Krauts got hanged in Nuremberg
Also, if you're bored, watch this incredibly underrated movie (Men Behind the Sun): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqnftyYWW4E
>>530651
fucking japs, they raped don king too, did you know that?
>>530651
Krauts got hanged but all the Kraut scientists got swooped up in Operation Paperclip.
The same thing happened here, the American military granted all the physicians immunity in exchange for all of their research and findings.
Who knows how much of Unit 731's research has permeated the medical sciences of today.
>>530651
*get
>Geyser or some shit in a lake explodes
>Releases a shitload of CO2
>1,700 people suffocate
>doesn't even get it's own fucking wikipedia article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Nyos#1986_disaster
Because novody cares about impoverished blacks?
wikipedia is atrocious for like 90% of human history
>>530463
If it bothers you that much, write one up. That's literally the point of wikipedia.
>Thousands of people dying from a natural disaster in the third-world deserves its own wikipedia article
Kek
Are the gods representations of platonic forms?
>>530121
Isn't everything in existence the representation of some form according to Plato?
>>530121
Nah.
They're real.
>>530142
I don't understand. Are you saying you believe in the gods but not the forms or the forms but not the gods?
Was there any chance of the Gallic Empire and/or Palmyrene Empire surviving? Also would their survival ensure the collapse of Rome or would it still be able to recover from the Crisis of the Third Century?
>>530106
neither of them existed though.. Palmyran empire on your map was lands controlled by Ptolemaic Egypt and Seleucid. Gauls were never a united empire .. is this meant to be hypothetical?
>>530272
What kind of fucking pleb knows what Ptolemaic Egypt is yet has never heard of the Crisis of the Third Century?
>>530282
A fucking BARBARIAN, that's who!
What went right?
Unbelievable luck in natural resources
>>530087
American support and western technology
Kicking in ottoman shit.
Western "friends" British then american
Are things like good, evil, morals and ethics ultimately subjective and thus pointless?
If so, why bother having any phil/his/ophical threads anymore?
Why follow any morals?
If not, how can you prove it?
Why would we care?
>inb4 tip*
They are contingent, not subjective, though they ultimately refer to subjective desires about the way the world ought to be.
Even if they were subjective you could still discuss them.
>>530027
> subjective
Yes
> pointless
Doesn't follow
>If so, why bother having any phil/his/ophical threads anymore?
Other people having different ideas is part of subjectivity
>Why follow any morals?
Even if you don't believe in them, people who do will wallop you
There's no such thing as evil. Nobody wants to be evil, we just do the best we can. But since we have conflicting opinions, it turns out its easier to disqualify the opposing party as evil.
Lets talk about Chomsky and his work in Linguistics, specifically his views on recursion and Everett's claims about Piraha lacking it. Is this true? Or are Chomsky's claims about Everett being a charlatan more true?
yeah
Regardless of what people say and regardless of my views Chomsky is a genius of our time
>>530011
lel thanks for your opinion
/his/ memes you hear people spout who don't know any better.
>War
>Death
>Famine
>and...
>Pestilence
>Not Conquest
How did this start?
> Hey /his/ I've a question about cultural marxism
> Let me tell you about the jews
>Holy
>Roman
>Empire
>>529960
>You needed 5 shermans to take on one panzer, and most of them would die trying!
are there any decent films dealing with germanic tribes, from 3rd century BCE to 5th century CE or so
>>529907
your mom
>>529907
Not that I'm aware of.
>>529907
>all those tribes
>just randomly slap on Odoacer, Syagrius and Nepos
Religion is an anthropological constant throughout human history. In addition, the occult, spirituality, and other forms of divination have been present in almost every human society.
If the idea of God were to have an evolutionary basis, why isn't their a consistent global monoculture of religion that would have developed independently in various parts of the world? Why are the religions of more "archaic" societies based on animism and many deities while more organized ones tend to be monotheistic? What explains the trend from simple to complex and changing religious practices?
Atheists please keep the fedora out of this; this is an anthropological discussion, not an existence, non-existence of otherworldy things ones.
>>529897
This is the most pretentious thing I have read all day. Please kill yourself.
wtf did I just read
i just noticed that as time passes the most powerful entity in history moves to the west
Interesting observation but any kind of pan-Asian union is impossible. East asians nations detest each other and India/Pakistan/Bangladesh will never unite/work together (mostly Pak and India).
>>529868
This makes no sense
>>529868
If he was nationalistic and liberal
Why did he created an empire with Catalans, Dutch Germans and Italians?
Germans from Lorraine don't apply since they are French wannabes
Also it's wrong to find Napoleon good looking in his young pictures?
>>529614
France's survival depended on the spread on Enlightenment ideas. France's chances of pulling off the Revolutionary Wars again would not be so good. As such, France needed to expand to gain more fighters and resources.
>>529614
>Also it's wrong to find Napoleon good looking in his young pictures?
You'd be wrong if you didn't.
>>529614
Feel free to tear me to shreds if this is wrong, but I remember him saying he would give Poland a national Identity and tried to do the same by unifying Germany