What are your favorite military marches or traditional patriotic type songs?
I'm a big fan of When Johnny Come Marching Home
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRJB036ev2Q
British Grenadiers
https://youtu.be/PGrxHO-B2TY
We are marching to the field, boys we're going to the fight/And we bear the glorious stars for the Union and the right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hF9cF3eOQDA
>My philosophy is that I should be king
Really Plato?
>Suppose there was a magical cave and it was really cool outside of it
Why do we take this guy seriously again?
>Knowing that you know nothing means you are smart!
Fuck this guy!
Plato is a faggot but so is OP.
>>865037
5/10 bait, maybe someone will fall for it
>>865039
I think of the two OP is a much bigger faggot.
Why was Britain so irrelevant in wwii despite having all the resources of the largest empire in the world?
All those resources and population yet they still couldn't keep up with German production and man power, it's shocking stuff
Britain itself is a small bunch of islands.
During WWII these islands were blockaded by the Germans making it hard to get all of these resources and men to and from these islands.
Also a large chunk of British overseas territory was attacked and/or taken by opposing forces.
Germany on the other hand was landlocked, and once it had conquered western Europe it was free to move manpower and materials around the continent as it liked.
>>863669
I think you might have over simplified your view on Britain during ww2
>>863669
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_production_during_World_War_II
Britain and it's empire outproduced Germany by close to 2:1 margin.
were Eurasian horse nomads generally scum?
such groups are almost always described as savages by authors from settled groups who interacted with them. chinese and russian sources use 'tartar' and 'mongol' as an insult, Eastern Europeans always describe groups like the Cumanians as thugs who would ride into their territories, trying to steal their stuff, livestock and women. true, horse nomads were always characterised as excellent fighters, but also as lazy (using slaves or subservient groups to do any production), violent, ignorant, disregarding of human life and private property.
their history seems to fit this characterization. nomadic lifestyle generally involved pillaging your settled neighbours. when they created major empires, they just took this mindset to a new level. just read some quotes from Ghengis Khan: his conquests didn't even have any ideolgical basis, he basically said that they are conquering nations, destroying cities and killing millions because they can. and this was one of the more solid nomadic empire. most of them (such as the Hunnic or Timurid empires) just involved an army storming through lands and forcing locals to pay tribute. it's debatable if those even qualify as empires, or just lands raided by a very large and well organized group of brigands.
there is also no known cultural achivement by horse nomads. sure, they cannot be expected to create great buildings, but what about literature or religion? whenever they stayed somewhere for a long time, they quickly adopted local culture (see Ghengis Khan's successors in Persia and China). or look at the Huns: we know pretty much nothign about them, apart from a few artifacts there is no such thing as Hunnic art, we don't even know what there religion was like.
horse nomads really look like the most worthless type of people in history, who only ever managed to destroy or steal other people's stuff while creating nothing.
Literal bandits and marauders and little else. So yeah, scum.
>>862494
> vikings murder, pillage, loot, and rape.
> greatest people ever.
> Mongols murder, pillage, loot, rape, and turn (what was at the time) Eastern Europe into Asia.
> worst people ever.
>>862519
>false dichotomy + strawman: the post
Why are there never any discussions here about one of the best classicists and philosophers of the 20th century?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rioS0H-EHdw
>>856264
Oh shit! I didn't realize there was a Benardete lecture up. Are there any others?
i've never seen a thread abuot classicists here. i want to get into it myself, where do i start?
>>856569
Are you asking where should you start with studying the classics?
hey it's the guy that posted those philosophy notes a little while ago, I also found (incomplete) religion notes, but I'm a bit more apprehensive about posting them since I'm worried about the ensuing shitstorm it might cause. Should I just say fuck it and post them anyway?
>>869102
>philosophy notes a little while ago
Which?
>>869110
he walls of text that a few anons responded to. It is entirely possible you had not seen them at all.
>>869116
Link to the thread?
Tell me about pre-Constantine Christian-Jewish relations. Was there always a sense of YOU KILLED MUH SAVIOR in the Christian community, or was there any solidarity between them seeing as they were both peoples oppressed by the Romans?
>>867782
There wasn't really a clean split and there's evidence that the Christian faction that became the RCC aggressively converted or stamped out pretty much anyone who disagreed with them.
>>867782
Christians and Jews had a long and complicated relationship even back then. For a good portion of early Christianity, you first had to convert to Judaism. For much of Roman history before Constantine, neither religions were 'oppressed'. They were tolerated so long as they paid a special tax to the Empire in loo of emperor worship.
>>867958
There was a clear split after Bar Kokhba
Did he misread Hegel?
What makes you think he read Hegel?
If anything he read Heidegger properly.
>>867602
He went on about thesis and antithesis and shit
>>867607
Hegel didn't do that, tbqh. Not to a noteworthy extent, especially compared to other philosophers.
Has socialism EVER been successful anywhere?
Pic related clearly wasn't
Mondragon Corporation
Kibbutzim
Worker Cooperative Movements
Depends what you mean by "socialism."
Discuss economics. Here's a topic to start off:
>In your country, do you feel the taxes on the rich are too low/high? Do you feel the poor get too many/few benefits? What would be your ideal layout for this?
But feel free to talk and debate anything economics-related.
I'm American, so I think the military budget needs a severe cut. Use that to give some tax relief, welfare, pay the national debt or whatever is needed. That budget is a wasteful goldmine.
>>866193
>In your country, do you feel the taxes on the rich are too low/high?
The whole taxation system and administration is broken as hell, so it doesn't matter.
>Do you feel the poor get too many/few benefits?
Whatever the agenda, shit never gets done. So, doesn't matter again.
>What would be your ideal layout for this?
Non-economic measures, like strengthening law and bureaucracy, transparency accountability, etc. Deliberative and participative action.
Why have the bourgeoisie not yet been overthrown and liquidated.
coolest hats in history thread go go go
>>864874
The roof tile looked better on him imo.
>>864918
pretty hat machine
>Year 12016 HE
>Not being a historical materialist
Why even bother studying history?
This
>being published by verso
>ever
>>864820
I've realized now that 4Chan is essentially the internet version of ancient Greek city-states.
Every state feels some weak sense of vague camaraderie that makes us a "country", but they always fuck around with each other and mock each other.
So help me list these suckers out. I'm convinced that /fit/ is Sparta, and /sci/ is Athens. What does that make /his/?
We're olympus
>>864585
Both comparisons are way of. Closer role to Athens would be /a/.
Byzantium
Now hear me out. We're very new, we've got an interesting topic that should have been given a board earlier (Byzantium was relatively new, and was located in a great place) and we're very much interested in History, while Byzantium was fairly important, from what I hear.
Rome never fell.
It just converted to a different religion.
Discuss.
>rome
>does not control rome
There's no empire anywhere in the area anymore though.
>>864207
There's the EU.
Arguably, if you want to include Anatolia, you could expand the definition to NATO and it's Mediterranean Partnership Program it holds with Israell, Jordan, Morroco, Algeria and Egypt, but this would expand the definition of Roman Empire to North America, which, altogether with the Meditteranean/Europe, is more Atlantic than Mediterranean. No wonder it's called North Atlantic Treaty Organization, so the EU would be a better call, despite not holding ME and NA.
Why was sub-Saharan Africa not developed (historically) as much as their Eastern and Western counterparts? By historically, I mean beyond the past 500 years. Why do we not see or hear of great empires, cities, architecture, or historical figures?
>>863904
>Why was sub-Saharan Africa not developed (historically) as much as their Eastern and Western counterparts?
Tsetse flies, malaria, yellow fever, lack of any staple crops until the southeast asian crop package arrived, regular coastline, no calm rivers, 2nd or 3rd lowest world population density, etc.
>Why do we not see or hear of great empires, cities, architecture, or historical figures?
Because assuming you're not from Africa its history if irrelevant to you
Much like how Americans know fuck-all about siberia, polynesia, and australia
Or sometimes europe for that matter unless they're heritagefags
>>863975
but I'm aware of the greeks, romans, ottomans
>this thread again