Regardless of their reputation, the Aztecs controlled and maintained an extremely impressive empire in Central Mexico. Other cultures include Tarascans, Mixtec, Mayans, Tlaxcalans, etc.
Their empire was quite small at only about 300,000 square kilometers (at it's height, Roman Empire was 25 times larger). Regardless, they kicked Rome's ass in a lot of ways.
During the conquest of Tototepec, they mobilized an army of about 400,000 soldiers for a single campaign. By comparison, that was about the same size as the entire Roman army.
They ruled hegemonically, meaning that the regions under their control were relatively autonomous. This kept the cost of administration low and maximized the efficiency of taxation, because the locals felt more comfortable living under the control of their own lord. All tribute was centralized in the Valley of Mexico and the capital, Tenochtitlan, making it one of the most densely populated and richest regions on earth.
>>865111
Still, since no horses were available, the furthest food-tributing region was located only 300 km from Tenochtitlan, which is the distance between Genoa and Venice.
Additionally, the logistics reports suggest that this food was likely sent to the Aztec garrison in Oaxaca instead.
Contributing with pics.
pic related Mixtecs
1. think up of an historical event
2. draw it in paint, gimp etc
3. others guess
>>832507
I don't think anyone guessed this last time...
>>832530
Fourth Crusade?
>>832536
Are you fucking kidding me?
Does the Carthaginian symbol remind you of a fucking Crusade?
Please tell me you're joking...
anybody want to watch the history channel while its actually showing history rather than pawn stars?
theyre showing 2 hours on the dark ages from 12-2 EST. turn it of at 2 though pawn stars is on right after
Sure am. I miss the days before pawn shops and aliens.
>>881976
growing up I would watch the shit out of modern marvels and there'd always be a good documentary on after and its like all I would watch
>>881962
I don't understand why Pawn Stars is viewed as something that doesn't belong on the History Channel
It has historic items and shit
I just want to live in a neolithic tribe full of people I'm related to.
Who else here thinks modern life SUCKS?
>tfw you will never settle your tribe and make the settlement an agricultural center, living on beyond your life, the descendants of your tribe continuing to live on, making empires and kingdoms, and known as an ancient city millennia from your lifetime
return the kid
Return the kid
What are the philosophical virtues of Anarchism?
What are the philosophical arguments against it?
No /pol/ please.
>>881242
don't vote organise to take industry
>>881242
>What are the philosophical virtues of Anarchism?
It assumes that people are basically decent and rational, and treats them accordingly.
>What are the philosophical arguments against it?
It assumes that people are basically decent and rational, but they're not.
The biggest argument I can think of against it is that any functioning social organization a group of anarchists create will be a pseudo-state. It all comes down to a few simple concerns.
1. Large numbers of people living together means some people's wills being denied for the benefit of other wills.
2. A fully voluntary society will be rendered redundant by any population growth whatsofreaking ever.
Even if everyone signs on and says "This is the kind of social organization I want", you'll have people in 100 years saying "I didn't sign shit"
The closest thing to a functioning anarchist society would be a series of communes whose only punishment for serious crime is banishment, and ignoring the massive reasons that would suck, I'm convinced any working arrangement set up in such a manner would be effectively identical to a state.
The question isn't whether the state is desirable, its whether its inevitable.
Why would God, an omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence, omnibenevolence perfect absolute being beyond time, space, matter and becoming create an imperfect, limited, flawed universe bound by time, space, matter and becoming?
How do Christians respond to this question?
>>881127
Because he wanted to #YOLO
boredom
With all kinds of mental gymnastics.
Does /his/ agree with pic related?
>>881115
More than /pol/ does.
People misunderstand logical fallacies often, especially ad hominem, no true scotsman and appeal to nature.
am I to agree with the existence of these fallacies or the unwritten consensus not to commit them
The Spanish Inquisition. Let us discuss.
Purifying the land in the name of God? Or senseless killing for the fuck of it?
The Catholic Church is and always has been an abomination.
>>880493
The Pope does well when he grants remission to souls, not by the power of the keys (which he does not possess), but by way of intercession.
Wasn't their total number of people killed like 5,000 over a 400 year stretch?
Was it autism?
>>880297
Yes
>>880297
No. Not being able to to handle critisism is autistic
>>880297
No, it was constipation.
Why are Catholic cultures more inclined to irreverance (in casual idioms and profanity) than Protestant cultures, yet less inclined towards atheism?
>>880287
What kind of person is inclined to make jokes, banter, etc?
A normal person.
Protestants are basically culturally autistic, hence the uptightness and regimented thinking patterns.
>>880287
>swearing in a casual setting is irreverence
>>880351
This.
What is the best film or TV portrayal of Henry VIII, King of England?
>>880224
He got Henrys baby-like tantrum personality right except Henry was no sexy ladies man.
>>880234
He was considered a sexy ladies man in his youth. Then he had that accident that fucked up his leg and started getting fatter and crazier and having people murdered.
Wolf Hall
>Last emperor of Brazil, by the age of 5 he assumed the throne.
>Educated in the arts, philosophy and fluent in many languages
>Loved by his people and respected by intelectuals such as Darwin, Hugo, Wagner, Pasteur, etc.
>Faced crysis, wars and worked to abolished slavery.
>During his reign, Brazil experienced a growth of proportions never seen before.
Unfortunately, his poor health and morale in his latter years were responsible for the overthrow of monarchy.
I'm British and thus our head of states are relatively powerless, but King George VI was pretty based. He got over his stutter and kept up morale in WW2, picked up the slack from his shitty older brother, and had a good film made about it 70 years later
>>879814
There's alot of great leaders to pick from, but I'll go for one who did actually not lead in Denmark ever. But Rollo became Duke of Normandie( land of the northmen). Given by by the French to stop them from sacking them over and over again. Great Great Grandfather to William of Normandie(The Conqurer). Hence the start of the bloodline that still to this day rule commonwealth as Monarch. As Victoria was know as the Grandmother of Europe and King Chrsitian IX of Denmark father-in-law of Europe this makes virtually every single Royal Ruler of Europe of Danish bloodline
>>879863
But I thought you'll choose Vicky as a brit.
I agree with George VI basedness though, unusual history figure.
Is AlphaGo really a huge breakthrough in artificial intelligence, or does it really just show how AI is impossible?
No.
>>879366
To which question?
>>879313
A computer defeating a 9p (9-dan) is a really big deal.
A 9p defeating AlphaGo is a big deal for the 9p, but us mortals can't really understand how big a deal it is.
None of this has anything to do with whether or not AI is impossible. I'm an intelligence, but I'm only 5k.
I have a question /his/.
What is the name for the nomadic peoples of central asian?
The Huns,Turks,Mongols etc. do they have a common name or are they completely different peoples.The swiss,swdes,germans are referred to as Germanics is there such a name for these types of people?
>>879284
steppe niggers
Steppe peoples. I haven't heard a different or more specific term used.
They were basically a melange of ethnicities which were grouped more by language then anything else.
>>879291
Pretty much.
Most just use the more PC "steppe peoples," though.
Is America an empire?
Yes.
>"""United"""" """States""""
>it's a semantics episode