Who do you consider to be underrated?
I'm going to throw out the ancient Israelites. They get none of the credit given to the Greeks.
Sure, they didn't conquer as much, but they did pull off some great victories. The conquest of Canaan during early antiquity. Judah fighting off the Assyrians.
Later revolting against and beating the Seleucids. Multiple revolts against Rome, the last of which took a massive response to put down.
They were good at punching above their weight class, fought like total fanatics (although this also prohibited assimilating conquered people's and growing) and had cool hats.
Also, the Wampanoag and Naragansett.
Literally decimated the fighting aged population of New England, almost destroying it, while fighting with shit weapons. Armed forces were roughly the same size, so it was a good fight even if it ended up destroying them.
Pre-Kobanî ISIS takes my vote, by all account ferocious fighters who actively sought death.
After the US started to support the incompetent Kurds it all fell apart, and now their ranks are watered down by inexperienced cowards from the West.
>>1187054
Kind of not a fair comparison as the Hebrews have a living God fighting for them.
Coming from a non US citizen - why is FDR regarded as one of the worst presidents of the USA in /his/? As far as I've read, the modern society considers FDR to be one of the GOATs
>>1181631
>why is FDR regarded as one of the worst presidents of the USA in /his/?
Who the fuck says this? It isn't 2008 and Ron Paul isn't reddit's hero anymore.
>>1181631
He basically just golfed his last term and did jack shit. Oh, wait, that's Obama.
GOP butthurt mostly.
They have to explain away the fact that Washington consensus neoliberal policies resulted in a stagnating middle class, but Keynesian policies made the US into a hyperpower.
Could an Islamic "reformation" on the same scale of the Protestan Reformation occur without a widely accepted Caliphate?
Islamic reformation already occured, it's called Wahhabism / Salafism.
>>1178753
Isn't that kind of happening now?
>>1178753
>ISIS
>Wahhabism
>Shia
Wew
How would the world have been different if the old monarchies Europe and China etc. remained in place throughout the 20th Century?
much different
much, much different
>>1188084
Better? or worse?
Much better
lets discuss hedonism
What's to discuss? You either agree pleasure is a good or you don't.
>>1187694
Splitting (also called black and white thinking or all-or-nothing thinking) is the failure in a person's thinking to bring together the dichotomy of both positive and negative qualities of the self and others into a cohesive, realistic whole. It is a common defense mechanism used by many people.[1] The individual tends to think in extremes (i.e., an individual's actions and motivations are all good or all bad with no middle ground).
>>1187717
Oops. I mean this:
Many individuals with developmental disability think in "concrete" or "black and white" terms. This may particularly apply to those with autism or who are affected by fetal exposure to alcohol. “Black and white” thinkers like rules. They like rules that are always the same way.
They don't handle "gray areas."
/His/ red-pill me on the Holy Spirit
>Been reading the Bible, intensely, and recently finished the Nag Hammadi
>Jesus, and prominent figures in the Bible were in 'the Spirit' when talking with God, the Father
>Does not mention the Holy Spirit as a ghost, instead as the Holy Oil
>Holy Spirit is the Holy Spirit
>In the Nag Hammadi, Jesus almost gives the recipe for the Holy Spirit, tells us to figure out the rest ourselves
Anyone else go this deep into the Holy Spirit? Some other interesting things I found out, the holy oil (water) we use today is totally fake. True baptism is when we brew the Holy Oil and 'drown' in it. Like our lungs fill up with it and we somehow breathe under water with it. Then you enter the 'Spirit'.
>>1187010
meant to say,
>Holy Spirit is the Holy Oil
Also I brewed a small batch of what I thought it was, had some very interesting aspects, though it says in the Nag Hammadi not to disclose the recipe for everyone must find it themselves.
My only concern is doing is on a full scale and drowning in it to become baptized. I love God, and the Holy Spirit, but this will be something I have never done and my balls cringe thinking about it. If anyone else believes this give me some encouragement.
>>1187010
>>/x/
>>1187026
>>/b/
Celts seemed to have substantial territory, and done influence on the classical cultures of the Mediterranean. Why is it that they never seemed to make anything much beyond that era? I understand that Gaul was well on its way to being a nation of city-states, did Rome simply kill Celtic civilisation in its infancy? What made them never have their time like Slavs, Germanics, and Italics?
Celtic civilization died in the cradle
>>1186798
Stabbed to death by the eternal Latin
>>1186779
>did Rome simply kill Celtic civilisation in its infancy?
Pretty much
>What made them never have their time like Slavs, Germanics, and Italics?
They kind of did, just "their time" was so early that it's basically irrelevant by now.
What foods would Jesus have eaten?
Bread and fish
Figs and olives.
For 40 days, nothing apparently.
What was the silliest thing about the Holy Roman Empire, /his/? I imagine this gigantic clump of city-states, duchies and whatever else must have attracted some snide comments from contemporaneous figures of its era.
There is literally nothing silly about the Holy Roman Empire.
>>1186634
What made them holy, roman, or an empire?
>Your typical Voltaire poster
Good history books?
>>1186630
Mein Kampf
http://pastebin.com/u/jonstond2
Stalingrad by Antony Beevor was probably one of the more entertaining history books I've read.
What exactly made feudalism obsolete from a practical point of view?
Also, are there any countries that still had/have a (neo-)feudal system post-industrialization?
Plague
Suddenly the serfs had the merchants and nobles by the balls
automation
most communist countries ironically enough
>>1186436
When you think about it, the plague was kind of a reset button.
What is /his/'a opinion on this book?
>>1186073
/his/'s, my bad.
Bullshit pseudohistory with a dash of futurist speculation to boot.
The guy should stick to medieval military history.
>>1186073
I thought his treatment of prehistoric culture was great.
Lost interest as he started to go off on tangents about legal theory 'n' modern applications of anthropology 'n' shit.
Can a depression be healed by nihilism? And how does one reach that state?
>>1185978
On the contrary. I find niihilism depression-inducing.
>Can a depression be healed by nihilism?
Absolutely not.
>>1185978
Nihilism can't, but probably absurdism can.
Imagine if Germany stopped existing after 1918...
Imagine where the world could've been by now...
launching colony ships
Hundreds of millions more white people alive today. Dozens of ancient European cities would be intact. More monarchies and aristocratic families would survive. The world would be tremendously better.
>>1185932
Not to mention that half of Europe wouldn't be under the thumb of the soviets for half a century.
>early modern philosophers were all atheistic but had to include god in their system to appease the plebs
>>1185795
Most people -believers included- treat religion as a background thing really.
>>1185795
>atheistic
>ic
Atheism with autism!?
>>1185817
same thing tbqh