Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 2918. page

Celtic Christianity

>>1611012
Isn't that Catholic like how Copts are Orthodox?

>>1610997
The Eastern Orthodox Church.

File: Luther_as_the_Devil's_Bagpipes,_1535.jpg (48KB, 393x525px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 393x525px

>“Christ committed adultery first of all with the woman at the well about whom St. John tells us. Was not everybody about Him saying: ‘Whatever has he been doing with her?’ Secondly, with Mary Magdalene, and thirdly with the woman taken in adultery whom he dismissed so lightly. Thus even Christ, who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died.”
(Table Talk , Weimar edition, vol. 2., no. 1472, April 7 - May 1, 1532; Wiener, p. 33).

>“But Christ took upon Himself all of our sin, and thus He died upon the cross. Therefore he had to become that which we are, namely a sinner, a murderer, evildoer, etc....For insofar as he is a victim for the sins of the whole world, He is not now such a person as is innocent and without sin, is not God’s Son in all glory, but a sinner, abandoned by God for a short time. Psalms 8:6.”
(Detailed Explanation of the Epistle to the Galatians, part 2, fourth argument, Walch edition, vol. 8, p. 2165, nos. 321-324).

>“Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly...No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day”
(Weimar ed. vol. 2, p. 372; Letters I, Luther’s Works, American ed., vol. 48, p. 282).

>“If, in faith, an adultery could be committed, it would be no sin”
(Möhler, Dr. Johann Adam, Symbolik, p. 131; Luther disput. Tom. I, p. 523).

>“When our consciences are assailed by the devil on account of our sins: so one should say, spoke D. M. Luther: holy devil, pray for us: Sancte Satan, ora pro nobis. Have we not sinned against you, kind Sir Devil?”
(Table Talk, Walch ed., vol. 22, chapter 26, p. 1242, no. 41).

>“If someone is being tempted, said Dr. Martin, or is amongst those who are being tempted, let him then beat Moses to death, and throw every stone at him”
(Table Talk, Walch ed., vol. 22, chapter 27, p. 1233).

Wouldn't call it bad when protestant ism mainly replaced Catholicism which is at least as bad.

>>1610676
>responsible for protestantism
So the the corrupt cleric elite isn't at fault? There would have been a Martin Luther sooner or later. There were even people before him who questioned the catholic dogma like Jan Hus or Savonarola. The difference was that Luther was backed by parts of elite like some princes who were intrested in his new theology and wanted to gain more independence from the Kaiser and pope

Bin Laden was trained by the CIA

>>1607780
Lol christians use steel and iron invented by pagan barabarians, the irony.

>>1607780
Bin laden used that gun from a ruskie general he killed or some shit like that.

File: Grisette.jpg (31KB, 302x296px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 302x296px

>>1606372
Well off students in 19th Century France who stayed in dorms made "being open for a fuck" a requirement for hiring maids, called "Grisettes."

>It was customary, for example, for the large numbers of students from the
provinces to take mistresses, thus giving rise to the curious profession of grisette. One
close English observer of student life, while falling over backward not to condone the
condition, ended up conveying a certain admiration for such women. They looked after
their students faithfully and well, even managed the budget, in return for relief from dull
and ill-remunerated employment. While they might, like the ill-fated Fantine in Hugo's
Les Miserables, be left totally in the lurch when the student returned to provincial respon-
sibilities, and while marriage was out of the question, they sometimes received support
for children and perhaps some sort of payoff (being set up with a shop being a favorite-
many of the independent women owners got their start this way) in return for their faith-
ful service.

-"Paris, Capital of Modernity" by David Harvey

>>1606372
yeah it was part of the job, especially if you worked for a bachelor. I read about it somewhere. I'm looking for a source atm.

>>1606393
> They looked after
their students faithfully and well, even managed the budget, in return for relief from dull
and ill-remunerated employment.

That's weirdly touching, though probably not always perfect.

>>1608099
Everything has a correlation with the collapse of rome.

Pretty fucking sure that Rome was a socially unjust place.

>>1608099
Not really. Rome was a welfare state for hundreds of years

>>1602252
Just look at him, he's destroying everything the church has stood for a thousand years.

Even Catholics think this Pope is Antichrist.

>>1602275
>catholic church standing for anything but corruption, simony, debauchery, pederasty

File: Cannon_Fire[1].jpg (425KB, 1440x960px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1440x960px

OH SHIT WHAT DO WE DO NOW NIGGA

>>1609456
They had cannons in ancient times and pre 14th century middle ages?

>>1609447
Because of Greece's fucking cultural background.

Warfare has always been dependent on multiple backgrounds based on local realities (culture, wealth, known enemies, geography, etc).

That said, literally everyone figured out shield walls. And the Phalanx itself isnt almighty, as Celts and Macedonians proved.

boring moderate

File: darius.447x0-is-pid1034.jpg (88KB, 447x596px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 447x596px

>>1605946
Whenever I see those Persian style braided beards I can't help but wonder what they looked in real life. Was it just a stylistic adaptation of curly hair or did they literally look like that?

>>1605946
>actual Sargon

based

>Carl Benjamin

autistic neckbeard loser

1922-1936 Italy.

True fascism hasn't been tried yet.

DONALD DRUMPF! XD

File: 11122121.png (182KB, 227x294px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 227x294px

>>1597206
I can't believe my eye.. A barbarian thread.

How well recorded is Aztec history?

>>1597265
There are a few primary sources: Hernan Cortes, Bernal Diaz Del Castillo, and the Anonymous Conqueror were all conquistadors who detailed certain aspects.

Bernandino de Sahagun chronicled the Mexica point of view, and some Codices still exist in museums.

>farmers raiding and killing farmers is unfaaair REEEE VIKINGS A SHIIIIEEET

>>1602288
>killing farmers counts as a battle.
Because it does?

File: kiku.png (191KB, 347x494px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 347x494px

>yfw u learn katanas weren't folded one gorillion times and can't cut through through diamond

>>1609857
Yes.

Really no way going around it.

>>1609857
Yes and yes.

>>1609857
Lmao that Jew cuck got owned. Probably by an Italian too.

it was already in decay, and the thirty years wars was a symptom of its time

>>1609780
30-Years-War was a nail in the coffin.

File: 1461541640700d.jpg (9KB, 107x168px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 107x168px

>>1609780

bymp

>>1609726
I think those are just parade uniforms

File: __waffen_ss_parade_uniforms___by_panterria-d8or1hz.jpg (106KB, 923x865px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 923x865px

>>1610108
oh thanks, you're right

File: London_treaty_1915svg.png (186KB, 732x599px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 732x599px

Truly nobody gained from the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Maybe Montenegro.
It always had a horrible disjointed, overstretched government. Full of political compromise. Serbia would have been much better off with the territory of the London treaty, as it would have more resources, time and effort to put into Bosnia and Macedonia, which were neglected both economically, but also by the administration, laws (Sharia was left in effect for Muslims). The national identities of Bosnian Muslims and Macedonians wouldn't have developed, and by that i mean Macedonians would be assimilated and Bosnia would be a much better place.
Managing Croats internally took up majority of the political effort of the Kingdom. All in all, it was more trouble than it was worth.
Slovenia and Croatia would have been taken by Italy, Austria and Hungary had the state of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs not accepted the Serbian offer.
In fact, it was supposed to be a much better compromise, but pressure from the 3 other countries, defection of Vojvodina to Serbia and the Podgorica assembly, the Carinthia conflict, all made the fledgling state accept Serbia's not so generous offer.

Maybe, just maybe Croatia gained something. Because hadn't there been the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, Croatia would have never gained independence.
Bosnia and Montenegro would have been a part of Serbia in any scenario.
Vojvodina would have been split somehow. Maybe Romania would have more of it. But a big part of it would still go to Serbia.

>>1609498
Thank you for the insight anon.

>>1609498
>>1609561
Serbia always bites more off than they can chew.