How much would a Roman Denarius worth today in US currency?
Ten asses
Your average low-grade denarius is still worth $20-$50 in US currency. You just can't pay for groceries with it.
Though I recall reading about old Roman bronzes still being actively used as currency out in the villages in 18th century France.
Posted this thread on /pol/ but it didn't gather much success..
Could anyone disprove this video? i have been trying hard to do so but the more I research, the more it makes sense.
Is it true what he says about sovereign currencies, national debt being a hoax, full employment and so on?
I appreciate any help, looking to write my university thesis on the subject, if it proves to be true...
video related:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GtNzqV1fL8
>>1710071
>Posted this thread on /pol/
You have to go back.
>>1710085
/r/equesting /his/ version of this
>>1710085
Relax I'm not a /pol/ack, I assumed that was the best place to discuss it.
Clearly, I was mistaken
I want a serious answer, not only [COLAPSE].
I know the communism is prone to [COLAPSE] but... Why? I know the reasons that made the USSR [COLAPSE], but I don"t understand very well why the other socialist republics do so frequently, for example, I don"t understand why Venezuela is so close to collapse if it is a country with many natural resources (fertile land, the Orinoco basin, many minerals, oil, ecetera). Seriously /his/ Why?
Please, don"t post only [COLAPSE] i like this meme, but i want a serious thread.
I am not good in english but isnt it 'Collapse'?
The socialist bureaucrats often do not know very well how to conduct economic activity and socialist bureaucrats spend too much time on paperwork and too little to economic activi itself.
Honestly, no nation in which they work should collapse financially. Is nonsense be producing wealth and stay without it, is somewhat ironic pose the thesis that in the republics of workers they do not work.
I think Cuba resists the fact that there spend very little time on paperwork, but much to the economic work.
>>1709946
Don"t be bad with op i sometimes confuse words that are very similar in French and English. :^(
buddhist fucking shits you know what time it is?
HAIBUTSU KISHAKU
>>1709914
>not reciting the name of the Amida Buddha and receiving salvation
Native faith fucking shits get out of my country.
Buddhism is the single best thing that ever happened to that shitty little island. They'd be nothing without it.
>>1709914
>You are against Buddhism because it is a foreign religion and want to separate Buddhism from Shinto
>You declare yourself Neo-Confucianist, which clearly is not a foreign religion/philosophy from China.
>WE WUZ SHINTO SHAMANS 'N SHIT
Nice to e-meet you.
I'm Japanese.
I can't speak English well, so I depend on a translation site.
My English may be strange English.
There is much bad rumor about the Japanese military, but I'd like to insist on Japanese innocence about a comfort woman problem this time.
Please see this animation.
https://youtu.be/ggQaYD37Jm4
https://youtu.be/5Is6FbT5leM
https://youtu.be/ssAy5wtEQz4
I insist hard that Japan is innocent‼‼
Nothing wrong with comfort women to begin with. Raping people you defeated is a fun wartime activity.
t. Russian.
>>1709937
No it's barbaric and uncivilised.
t. Britbong
>>1709947
War is inherently barbaric.
Why was this important and why don't Mexicans seem to know what it is?
Well I read the treaty and can't seem to figure out why some Mexicans think US land belongs to them. Are they just really ignorant?
Modern mexicans are the descendants of uneducated dirt poor farmers who probably barely even knew there was a war.
Mexicans are as ignorant as the average american
What stories can /his/ tell me about these men? I remember hearing that these people live some very fascinating lives. One story is that allegedly a chessmaster played for his life in a Russian prison against Stalin/Lenin/Trotsky, though I don't know how reliable that is.
bump before bed
>>1709706
Ehh, most of them have, at most, an interesting anecdote or two, and a lot of them don't make sense if you're not a chessplayer yourself. I mean like, Botvinnik had a row with Averbakh, wouldn't speak to him socially for years, because Averbakh once had a position where he grabbed a queen for an easy endgame and a resignation rather than doing a forced 9 move checkmate, which offended Botvinnik's sense of chess purity.
I know Fischer once claimed that he almost didn't believe Euwe was ever a world champion, because he was "too normal".
I once gave odds to an IM, (and lost) over a misunderstanding. Dunno if that counts.
i heard that the first worldchampion wilhelm steinitz once drunkenly challenged god to play against him with one pawn less because there was no competitor at his time
albert einstein was kinda disappointed that the second world champion emmanuel lasker almost exclusively used his amazing intellect for chess although he was mathematically talented as well
the third worldchampion raul capablanca claimed to calculate 25 moves in advance in the endgame
the fourth champion alexander alekhine seemed to be somewhat of a nazi sympathiser at least he seemed to be welcome as a guest in nazi germany
also he was an alcoholic
the fifth worldchampion max euwe maybe even was too "normal" as bobby fischer claimed because he only won against alekhine because of his alcoholism
alekhine recovered after the slight victory of euwe ( 8:9 ) i think it was and hammered him with a very clear victory in the next world championship about 10:4 i think
the next world champion botvinnik was the only one to regain his title two times i think against smyslov and tal
tal was a heavy drinker and smoker and a player of immense creativity he was called something along the lines of magician of riga
tigran petrosjan was maybe the best defensive player of all time and he was although kind of deaf which granted him an advantage because he was lessed distracted by noise
boris spasski once played a magnificient game against bent larson in the fight of the UDSSR against the rest of the world in which he won in like 17 turns i think using a brilliant rook sacrifice
bobby fischer was the youngest grandmaster at his time i think at age 15 he might have had aspergers and a paranoid personality too
he kind of disliked chess later in his life which was propably due to his mental conditions as well but he claimed the game would be overtheorized to the point of the laughable importance of memorization of opening tactics in particular he thought the game should focus on creativity
>we wuz alexander the great n shiet
Why do macedonians think they're Greek or related to Alexander at all? Where did this wewuzism come from?
Serbian brainwashing
Serbian brainwashing after WWII. It was an attempt to destroy everything Bulgarian in the region.
>>1709588
They are about as related to Alexander the great as modern Greeks are.
Why was bloodletting such a popular medical procedure?
I was reading about Queen Victoria and her father was basically killed by English doctors who insisted on an extreme regiment of bloodletting for a minor ailment. His niece, Princess Charlotte, also died in childbirth because the doctors insisted on bloodletting during her delivery. Surely they must have observed positive effects occasionally or why else would medical professionals continue to recommend bloodletting if all it did was kill their patients? These were the most esteemed doctors in all of England too, the cream of the medical community at the time.
>>1709501
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humorism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humorism#Medicine
Superstition is a powerful force
>>1709501
Those bloodletting """"doctors"""" are one of the world's biggest trolls. They are the modern equivalent of a self-certified doctor telling you that shooting yourself will gradually make you bullet proof.
What's the funniest part is that these """"doctors"""" could kill anyone they wanted with bloodletting without even being questioned about their practices.
Why do Calvinists believe in Satan? Doesn't their version of God already take care of that tempting people to sin stuff?
>>1709402
Lucifer/ Satan is an established character in Christian scripture. His power and role in people's lives varies from in every denomination.
>>1709402
>Cucklic wonders why
Look, we tried to reboot Jew-free (see Meister Eckhart), but like your overlords always do, you papists threatened to burn it all to the ground if we did. So here we are, limping along years later, and like a spurned woman, you blame all the consequences of your fickle behavior on us. Such is life.
>>1709499
nigger wat
Redpill me on flanged maces
>>1709370
A symbol of authority rarely used on an actual battlefield. The medieval equivalent of a $50,000 double-barrel shotgun that somebody buys just to hang on a wall.
>>1709370
>get flanged mace to terrify filthy peasants
>get called to arms
>fighted armoured knights
>flanges get stuck in armour
>now armed with but a shitty arming sword
>die to superior warhammer
>>1709396
>warhammer
More like poorhammer am I right macebros
What's up with the American lack of assault/shock in battle?
Whenever I look over civil war battles, all I see are hour long gunfights, and I've heard that's what happened in Iraq and Vietnam too.
Americans for the most part are fellows worshippers in the Anglo-Saxon Cult of the Rifle. Leaveshock for the lesser countries.
>>1709363
>ITT: Anon reveals that he didn't know battles could last longer than 1 hour
>>1709376
Any more info on the cult of the rifle?
>Freedom of worship is meant to protect nearly every odd form of belief, but it does not allow believers to impose their faith on others. Yet historically, even those who were agnostic, argues Ivan Krastev, chairman of the Center for Liberal Strategies, came from religious backgrounds and asked religious questions. “But today, agnostics come from secular households,” he said, with little conception of what religious belief means or entails.
>Charles Moore, a British author who has written deeply about religion and about his own conversion to Catholicism, thinks there is a confusion in liberal democracy between keeping religion out of politics, preferred by many religious people, and “pretending that religion doesn’t matter and doesn’t exist.”
>In his view, “secularists have greatly underestimated what happens to a culture if you take God out of it.” Liberal societies require “a lot of shared values in order to be free,” Mr. Moore said, to hold together in the swirl of diversity.
>Without a belief in God, he said, “it’s more likely that your ultimate belief will become meaningless.” Further, “you don’t know what religious people are talking about, you don’t understand the springs of their behavior — the importance of scripture or the symbolism of blasphemy.”
>Worse, he said, is a growing ahistoricism. “If a secular person is taught that these things are merely private matters, they won’t understand how they affect world history.”
Non-believers of /his/, what attempts have you made to understand religious belief?
>>1709115
I attempt to understand religious belief every time I try to understand myself, as until recently I was a believer
>Without a belief in God, he said, “it’s more likely that your ultimate belief will become meaningless.”
This is not a reason to believe in God. I find the concept of objective morality unsatisfactory anyways. It being objective solely because God mandated it only makes it seem more arbitrary. I prefer a more down to earth approach: Will I benefit more from a lawless society that does not allow murder, stealing and rape or from a society that restricts me from doing these acts, but also protects me from these acts and punishes those who do them, discouraging it and making it less likely to happen to me? Do I benefit more from restricting people's ability to say political opinions I disagree with or with speech being protected, so that there is no chance my speech will be restricted and it is easier to have an open discussion of issues? In both cases, I'd say the latter. If this doesn't satisfy you, in America we already hold up the founding fathers ideas with religious reverence that is drilled into us in public schools which drives these shared values into us without the need for a God. Besides, christian God certainly isn't for freedom of religion, which I'm sure is among the "shared values" Moore is talking about. In Kings you'll see repeatedly that the Kings who are viewed with praise all actively suppressed the worship of other gods
>>1709200
*the Christian God
I went to a Catholic Highschool and studied various religions there and outside of school. I was always surrounded by religious people throughout my life, especially when I went to University.
Am I operating my brain, or is my brain operating me?
>>1708634
You operate your brain, to control the own mind is called intellect, using the force to operate. The brain controls you if you let it, reacting instead of being proactive, not being conscious and aware
That is one handsome gorilla. I want to have sex with it.
>>1708634
Got a big surprise for you, karl. You are your brain. There is no separation as far as anyone can know.
What is the comfiest time and place in history?
british landed gentry
1300 Venice
Now's the best time it's ever been to be alive