Which is harder to write:
poetry or prose?
>>9181535
Dumb frog poster
poetry is easier
trust me
I write poetry
all the time
>>9181535
Metrical poetry obv
When you get into freeverse it gets more ambiguous
It also depends on the quality of the prose or poetry, it's very easy to write shitty prose or shitty freeverse. It's not as easy to write something that's in meter, even if it is shitty. However, it may be harder to write super beautiful Nabokovian-Updikean prose than it is to write mediocre blank verse.
Basically this >>9181545
saged, idk why I wrote so much for such a dumb thread and self-evident question fuck u
I love this silly idiot.
>>9181357
>tfw you will never suck a warm Deutscher Dichter on the stairs
Those are some BIG legs
"WAIT!!! Dont start the painting yet!!! HILDA!!! damnit!! HILDA QUICK!!!! GEt My FAVORITe Snuggy(tm)! Qucik, Fetch it you DOG!! YOu Scoundrely Bitch!!!"
"Dude... im still working on the background... its gonna be another 7 hours... relax bro.. just be yourself, look natural"
I can't thInk of another board to ask this besides /lit/.
How does one get into, and appreciate, ballet? Where does one start, who does one watch, what does one read?
>>9181340
Youtube 'the nutcracker', also youtube 'swan lake', but before you watch those watch this, starting at: 45:00 (you really should hear the whole thing, its great, famous overture intro too... but unfortunately this video the sound is off with the visual... but its my favorite quality I found all else considered so I deal with it)(its not a ballet... its an opera... but there is lovely ballet scene... just... sacred, beauty and perfection, you will see, it is transcendently comfy, cathartic, peaceful, mellow, calming, pleasantly distracting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NufaurLuCw
well step 1 is being a faggot. Seems you've got that covered.
Is this more difficult than JR? Worth reading?
?
does lit not talk about this book anymore?
Haven't read but I dropped JR for being kind of shitty. It was very hard.
I can't imagine this being harder considering JR is entirely dialogue.
>>9181406
This board has been /lit/ up with The Recs threads for the last week. I'm 75% through it now and it's probably the most difficult book that I've read. It's hilarious; the plot is relatively easy to understand, but I feel like I'm missing a lot.
Read it. It's great.
A theatre near me is showing some movie about spiders and Neil Gaiman is going to be there.
Should I bother going? Tickets are $25.
>>9181332
GAYMAN :DDD
Sure, why not?
Get out of the house and do something interesting.
What does Neil Gagman bring
What early greek authors are the most relevant if I want to understand greek philosophy?
Can I just read Homer, Hesiod and Sophocles and then skip to Plato?
The only reason to read early greek authors is because Philosophy, from its beginning, directly opposes them.
Since there wasn't a real powerful priest caste in ancient Greece, the whole knowledge about physics, history, religion, aesthetics and moral values came from the poets. Philosophy challenges this with the innovative (for that time) idea that truth should be investigated with reason.
Reading the ancient poets will be useful, but you will probably still need footnotes and commentaries to understand all the references, for example, in the Republic.
Another thing: don't just "skip" to Plato. In order to understand Plato you need to study the philosophers that came before him, or else you will not be able to make sense of a lot of what he is saying (just look at all the recurring threads that say Plato was a moron, if you want a preview of what will happen to you). At the very least you should understand:
- where the basic problem on the being comes from (Parmenides + Heraclitus)
- what kind of solutions had been tried before Plato (the pluralists)
- the relativism and the dialectical innovations of the sophists
- Socrates (he was the one that ultimately moved the focus of investigation from nature to man, revolutionized the moral values of his society, pioneered the research on problems of language and invented the modern concept of soul on top of that)
>>9181320
You don't even need to read Homer, Hesoid, or Sophocles (although you should, for their own sake, because they are good). If you want to read Plato, just read Plato. No prerequisites.
>>9181320
A good way to start understanding Greek philosophy, in my opinion, is to listen to the great courses (also known as the teaching Company) lecture series on Ancient Greek civilization and also the series on Socrates and Plato.
The professors are award winning teachers and really help introduce and breakdown for you some of the most vital chunks of info about the subject.
Plus, it will make you very interested into the subject. Highly recommended.
ITT: words you used to pronounce wrong
When I was a kid I never heard the word subpoena spoken, and when I did I didn't think it was spelled like that. As a result, I pronounced it as "sub-po-ena" whenever I read the word.
Epitome as epee-tome
Pseudo as puh-sway-doh
It was very satisfying to finally recognize the pun in Sudowoodo's name.
>>9181245
imprimatur, segue, caste
>tfw to intelligent for correct pronunciation
Some for me: Askance, askew and omniscient
I finished making an English style guide!
Anon recommended me to read David Foster Wallace's 'Authority and American Usage'.
Inspired in part by that essay, I have tried to aggregate writerly wisdom and assorted grammatical and syntactical rules. It's certainly not perfect, nor complete, but it's a start.
I would love to create an annual edition of 'English Style', updating it with the edits and contributions that anons and others have proposed.
So give it a glace! And send me your opinions!
If you have comments, corrections, ideas, additions, and quotations (with sources), you may e-mail me at: [email protected]
Enjoy:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2c7se6ZnXXla0R6SnNMS2Qybk0/view?usp=sharing
>>9181233
Damned interesting. I'll read it tomorrow and reply again afterwards.
>>9181233
Add irony. to your list People need to know the fucking difference between irony and coincidence.
You can't really put a semi in your colon :/ you really need to be full bone.
Good try I guess
Of his more than 300
>>9181220
The Bet
>>9181220
The kiss
Has a scene from a book ever aroused you?
>>9181167
LOLITA hehehejeheejejjeje xD
>>9181167
Yes. /thread
It sounds edgy as fuck but 120 Days of Sodom. Only time I've ever masturbated to a book.
ITT: the movie was better
>>9181163
Every Stephen King books.
>>9181163
Are you shitting me? The story was so much better than the movie. The story didn't have that shitty plot involving the military or being able to see in the future in order to gain information. It was more about how language naturally affects our perception, whereas the movie turns this device into an illogical plot line.
Any Marxists who don't hate mysticism or the occult?
I feel like want to turn genocidal when it is even mentioned, but are totally cool with supporting mainstream exoteric religions for whatever class war reason they can come up with.
Nick Land. But don't hit on him, silly intellectuals, he's NOT your average Marxist.
Lots of chinks.
Marxism IS mysticism.
Fantasy
Selected:
>https://i.imgur.com/r688cPe.jpg
General:
>https://i.imgur.com/igBYngL.jpg
Flowchart:
>https://i.imgur.com/uykqKJn.jpg
Science Fiction
Selected:
>https://i.imgur.com/A96mTQX.jpg
>https://i.imgur.com/IBs9KE8.jpg
General:
>https://i.imgur.com/r55ODlL.jpg
>https://i.imgur.com/gNTrDmc.jpg
NPR's Top 100 Science Fiction & Fantasy Books:
>https://i.imgur.com/IJxTQBL.jpg
Previous Threads:
>>9168106
>>9156349
>>9141959
>>9132584
>>9114658
>>9099898
female warriors ruin books
>>9180806
Hello /sffg/ I am looking for novels that involve secret military units fighting supernatural shit so far I have found the Joe Ledger series by Jonathan Maberry any other suggestions?
>>9180818
women ruin everything
Would anybody on /lit/ know of any books that go into what it means to be or have a nation?
I don't mean nationalism. I mean I want to know what a nation is at its most basic level without tying it to politics or governance. I want to know what it means to be a "people".
>without tying it to politics or governance
>>9180778
Well I have an inclination to believe that nation is what a people have when the government is stripped away.
If anarchy befell the world then the Chinese would still have reverence for their ancestors, speak Mandarin and adhere to Buddhist/Tao/Confucian thought. Mexicans would still go to church, have fiestas, speak Spanish and make the same dishes. Tribes would know their allegiances and rules regardless of the old laws. The Kurds would fall back in with other Kurds, forgetting the government imposed borders because there si something to being a Kurd beyond civil law and borders. I assume that is where nation lies but I feel like i need to go deeper.
This is just how I see it and I want to test it against the thoughts of people who actually know what they are talking about.
Read any of the Torah (First 5 books of the Bible) or really just the Old Testament, it's all about the Jewish people and how God chose them.
Was this supposed to make me care about whether lobsters suffer or not? It felt very much like some elitist hipster who thinks raising his nose at people who just want to eat lobster with their families should make us think he is "deep".
>>9180410
1. it's about the morality of aesthetics in general
2. and yes you fucking retard it was supposed to make you care about the suffering of the lobster. If you struggle this much with empathy you're obviously reading just to make yourself feel smarter.
>>9180410
Spoken like a true uncultured swine.
>>9180418
>empathy
cute. I bet you read to learn things about yourself.