Or no now that we saw some Ancient Crete DNA? I must know.
>>3194566
It never was.
>>3194566
White as in European, yes
White as in light skinned, not really
>>3194589
>White as in European, yes
No not really. They existed outside modern European genetic variation.
Using Nazi Swastikas to share Peace in an Ad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1V0hVmi0C40
MISLEADING PROPAGANDA, EITHER, DUE TO IGNORANCE, OR DUE TO PERVERSE MOTIVES; RATHER THAN EDUCATING REGARDING ITS MEANING, AND HOW IT LEGITIMATELY REPRESENTS THE PRINCIPLES BEHIND NATIONAL SOCIALISM, IT MERELY BOLSTERS THE ESTABLISHED AND TRITE ZIONIST NARRATIVE, UNDER A FACADE OF REBELLIOUS KNOWLEDGE.
Is there historical proof that I will get a foreign wife when I invade a country and am winning the war.
Well if you're winning then you can probably just take one.
>>3193414
were the g*rms sick of their ugly women?
I think i might've just found the real reason WW1 broke out
How different would science and cultural advances be if the communist bolsheviks didn't try to destroy everything?
>science
>cultural advances
CYKA
>>3193412
we might have never go to space, as it was literally a personal effort of one guy who carefully packaged his dream as brilliant propaganda piece utilizing technology born from WWII which itself might not even happen without the Russian revolution.
gg no re
>>3193412
This bait is bad.
Is it a (((historical fact))) that the Spartan men were fucking each other when away from women, or is it one big propagated lie?
>>3193394
It is from Plutarch. So take it with several grains of salt
>>3193394
Athenians wrote what they wanted about their arch-nemesis Sparta, and it is basically Athenian records that gives us all those Spartan homo stories.
However the Athenian aristocrats that wrote these stories actually idolized homosex and Sparta, thus wrote a lot about how noble and homosex the Spartans were, and if only Athenians became as homosex, noble and monarchial as the Spartans, the Athenians would win the Peleponnesian war.
In the text "symposium" by Plato a wide array of Athenian aristocrats discuss love and they mainly discuss man-boy love. Heterosexual love is almost forgotten. However the conclusion of the text is that a man that truly loves a boy wouldn't abuse him, so only a "platonic" love is true love, where the man tries to make the boy strong and wise and not his sissy trap.
>muh rightful german clay!!1
>implying conquered land belongs only to the group that inhabited it right before the new settlers
>X objectively belongs to group Y
So if out of africa theory is true then blacks have a legitimate claim on everywhere in the old world, is this correct?
This also applies to the injuns too, they're just as bad as germans
>>3193317
rightful clay is a hypocritical opportunistic argument with no factual weight
people waged war and took land, periodically
if you can't even come out and say, "Yeah so fucking what? Come and take it back!", then you are a spineless cuck who's gonna get eaten by people without such scruples sooner or later
>>3193341
/thread.
All those byzaboos and palesticucks are pathetic
>>3193349
b-b-but muh subversion and dishonerabur tactics
israel was won with dirty trickssssss
Why did the Catholics hate Anabaptist so much in history? Especially when king Henry VIII ruled England, and the acts recorded by John Foxe, a book of martyrs
-Only things I could confer were
>money
>sustaining power of the Catholic church
>political power (appeasing the masses)
>human wickedness
>group think
>and tribalism
>Tfw your countrys history is commonly discussed in this board
How could a country with such a low population have been so relevant?
>>3194366
it just shows what kind of a joke european history is and how eurocentrism is a plague
But it wasn't.
The Swedish """Empire""" was a joke.
>tfw your country is eternal anglo of the middle east
but
>people talk about us even though they don't know anything about us
that's bad nibba
Can anyone recommend me a good translation of Titus Livy's History of Rome? Are the Penguin translations any good? They seem to be commonly available, and are like fifteen bucks each or so.
What say you? Any good ones out there that are preferably not split up into four separate books to be bought individually?
I want to read more about early Rome, so I'm going to get two of Adrian Goldsworthy's books, The Complete Roman Army and The Punic Wars, so I can read both modern and ancient accounts on Rome's early history.
Thanks for the help.
>>3193135
the history of Rome podcast is the most easily accessible source for a general framework to look into the early Roman history, though it IS very condensed You should listen to it to get a general feel and introduction to the topic then look the particular names and events in it to get in depth.
>>3193166
I just found out about it a couple days ago. Going to give it a listen. I just rather read this stuff so I can get as much info as I can [spoiler]So my screenplay/script for a Punic Wars television epic will be as accurate as possible.[/spoiler]
And like you said, it probably condenses stuff a lot. I'd rather have too much info that I can shave the fat off of rather than too little and have nothing to work with.
>>3193191
it does help to look the sources he uses like Livy and Polybius, the later of which is a much better source since he is far more neutral and actually contemporary to the events of the Punic and Macedonian wars, but here, Livy
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/
There are some youtube channels like Historia Civilis and Invicta that make pseudo-documentaries with all the same fluff and give you citations you can go off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOk6ppoQrkw
also if you plan to make a big epic on the punic wars, read Ad Astra.
What can you tell me about this, /his/?
You know it has always bugged me that Bose would name his regiments after Gandhi,Nehru and other Congress apparatchiks.
When they practically disowned him during the war in an effort to suck the Britshitter Dick and Nehru allegedly even got him Gulag'd by Stalin.
Naive Netaji
Ever hear of this guy? Executed by Constantine even though they worked on the edict of milan together (And was co-ruling the roman empire, hint hint about Constantine). Remember Arius? He was far from the first person to believe in a literal interpretation of ''The Son of God'' Hell, the Roman emperor who was known as ``The last true roman was totally non-trinitarian
This is basically an /r/ thread for everything pertaining to the growth of the Christian church from a non-trinitarian point of view.
How magnificent was the German colonization of the East, the Slavic and Baltic no mans land?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_African_origin_of_modern_humans#
>claims humans migrated from East Africa
>clearly shows a map showing humans migrating from West Africa
???
Maybe you could ask about this on their talk page?
>>3192557
What? I can't make an actual account for something, that's absurd!
Why did Spaniards bother conquering Native American cities and mixing with them? It's not like every single square inch of the Americas was occupied. The Spaniards could have simply formed villages in isolated areas.
>>3194151
They unironically believed that they needed to save their souls. Spanish missionaries learned irrelevant languages and traditions from people like the aymara and the mapuches with the exclusive purpose of converting them. The reacher further than the empire itself.
A gentleman came into my work the other day and started telling me about Emanuel Swedenborg and how great he is. Is he worth looking into? Anything worth reading? General thoughts on him?
>>3192404
I mostly know about people who he inspired, less about him.